1,027
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

3D laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective single-surgeon learning curve in the first 200 cases with oncologic and functional results

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 242-248 | Received 28 Oct 2020, Accepted 01 Mar 2021, Published online: 01 Apr 2021

References

  • Riikonen J, Kaipia A, Petas A, et al. Initiation of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies in Finland: impact on centralization and quality of care. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(3):149–154.
  • Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Barret E, et al. Innovative technique laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and oncological assessment. Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):14–20.
  • Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):648–658.
  • Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(8):1051–1060.
  • Basiri A, de la Rosette J, Tabatabaei S, et al. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? World J Urol. 2018;36(4):609–621.
  • Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study. J Urol. 2010;184(6):2291–2296.
  • Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, et al. Technical evolution of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 450 cases. J Endourol. 2003;17(3):143–154.
  • Stolzenburg J, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: The University of Leipzig experience of 2000 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2319–2326.
  • Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, et al. Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2014;114(4):617–629.
  • Jourdan IC, Dutson E, Garcia A, et al. Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2004;91(7):879–885.
  • Bove P, Iacovelli V, Celestino F, et al. 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study. BMC Urol. 2015;15(1):12.
  • Andras I, Crisan N, Gavrilita M, et al. Every setback is a setup for a comeback: 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after robotic radical prostatectomy. J Buon. 2017;22(1):87.
  • D`Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Original contributions biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280(11):969–974.
  • Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, et al. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702. 04
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–196.
  • Martin GS. Scoring instructions for the expanded prostate cancer index composite. University of Michigan; 2002. https://medicine.umich.edu/sites/default/files/content/downloads/Scoring%20Instructions%20for%20the%20EPIC%2026.pdf
  • Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50(6):854–857.
  • Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heillbron tecnique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2101–2108.
  • Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):2299–2306.
  • Nilsson AE, Carlsson S, Laven BA, et al. Karolinska prostatectomy: a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(6):453–458.
  • Forsmark A, Gehrman J, Angenete E, et al. Health economic analysis of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for prostate cancer within the prospective multicentre LAPPRO trial. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):816–824.
  • Sánchez-Margallo FM, Durán Rey D, Serrano Pascual Á, et al. Comparative study of the influence of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional urological laparoscopy on surgeons’ surgical performance and ergonomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(2):123–137.
  • Dirie NI, Wang Q, Wang S. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopic systems in urology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2018;32(9):781–790.
  • Benelli A, Varca V, Simonato A, et al. Pentafecta rates of three-dimensional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our experience after 150 cases. Urologia. 2017;84(2):93–97.
  • Bertolo R, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Current status of three-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: an ESUT systematic review and cumulative analysis. J Endourol. 2018;32(11):121–1027.
  • Handmer M, Chabert C, Cohen R, et al. The Australian laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(1–2):100–103.
  • O'Malley PJ, Van Appledorn S, Bouchier-Hayes DM, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in Australia: initial experience. World J Urol. 2006;24(2):165–170.
  • Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431–452.
  • Carlsson S, Jäderling F, Wallerstedt A, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy for very-low-risk prostate cancer: results from the prospective LAPPRO trial. BJU Int. 2016;118(2):205–212.
  • Baunacke M, Schmidt M, Thomas C, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after robotic vs. retropubic radical prostatectomy in routine care: a 6-year follow-up of a large German health services research study. World J Urol. 2020; 38(7):1701–1709.
  • Koehler N, Gansera L, Stolzenburg J, et al. Early continence in patients with localized prostate cancer. A comparison between open retropubic (RRPE) and endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE). Urol Oncol. 2012;30(6):798–803.