Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Volume 55, 2021 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
1,181
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Stockholm Spinal Cord Uro Study: 3. Urodynamic characteristics in a regional prevalence group of persons with spinal cord injury and indications for improved follow-up

Elisabeth Farrellya Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department NVS, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden;b Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Lena Lindboc Aleris Rehab Station, Stockholm, SwedenView further author information
&
Åke Seigera Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department NVS, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden;c Aleris Rehab Station, Stockholm, SwedenView further author information
Pages 412-418 | Received 05 Mar 2021, Accepted 09 Jul 2021, Published online: 19 Jul 2021

References

  • Farrelly E, Lindbo L, Wijkström H, et al. The Stockholm Spinal Cord Uro Study: 1. Basic characteristics and problem inventory. Scand J Urol. 2019;53(6):403–410.
  • Farrelly E, Lindbo L, Wijkström H, et al. The Stockholm Spinal Cord Uro Study: 2. Urinary tract infections in a regional prevalence group: frequency, symptoms and treatment strategies. Scand J Urol. 2020;54(2):155–161.
  • Stillman MD, Barber J, Burns S, et al. Complications of spinal cord injury over the first year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(9):1800–1805.
  • New PW. Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39(6):665–670.
  • Przydacz M, Chlosta P, Corcos J. Recommendations for urological follow-up of patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(6):1005–1016.
  • Kreydin E, Welk B, Chung D, et al. Surveillance and management of urologic complications after spinal cord injury. World J Urol. 2018;36(10):1545–1553.
  • McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, et al. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981;126(2):205–209.
  • Musco S, Padilla-Fernández B, Del Popolo G, et al. Value of urodynamic findings in predicting upper urinary tract damage in neuro-urological patients: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1522–1540.
  • Gerridzen RG, Thijssen AM, Dehoux E. Risk factors for upper tract deterioration in chronic spinal cord injury patients. J Urol. 1992;147(2):416–418.
  • Shin JC, Lee Y, Yang H, et al. Clinical significance of urodynamic study parameters in maintenance of renal function in spinal cord injury patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014;38(3):353–359.
  • Weld KJ, Graney MJ, Dmochowski RR. Differences in bladder compliance with time and associations of bladder management with compliance in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000;163(4):1228–1233.
  • Nseyo U, Santiago-Lastra Y. Long-term complications of the neurogenic bladder. Urol Clin North Am. 2017;44(3):355–366.
  • Linsenmeyer TA, Bagaria SP, Gendron B. The impact of urodynamic parameters on the upper tracts of spinal cord injured men who void reflexly. J Spinal Cord Med. 1998;21(1):15–20.
  • Elmelund M, Klarskov N, Bagi P, et al. Renal deterioration after spinal cord injury is associated with length of detrusor contractions during cystometry – a study with a median of 41 years follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(6):1607–1615.
  • García Leoni ME, Esclarín De Ruz A. Management of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(8):780–785.
  • Eldahan KC, Rabchevsky AG. Autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury: Systemic pathophysiology and methods of management. Auton Neurosci. 2018;209:59–70.
  • Levi R, Ertzgaard P. Quality indicators in spinal cord injury care: a Swedish collaborative project. The Swedish Spinal Cord Injury Council 1998. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1998;38:1–80.
  • Biering-Sørensen F, DeVivo MJ, Charlifue S, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(8):759–764.
  • Rosier P, Schaefer W, Lose G, et al. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1243–1260.
  • Gajewski J, Schurch B, Hamid R, et al. An International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (ANLUTD). Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(3):1152–1161.
  • Bonniaud V, Bryant D, Parratte B, et al. Development and validation of the short form of a urinary quality of life questionnaire: SF-Qualiveen. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2592–2598.
  • Kocher NJ, Damaser MS, Gill BC. Advances in ambulatory urodynamics. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21(10):41.
  • Schurch B, Iacovelli V, Averbeck MA, et al. Urodynamics in patients with spinal cord injury: a clinical review and best practice paper by a working group of the International Continence Society Urodynamics Committee. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(2):581–591.
  • Koschorke M, Leitner L, Sadri H, et al. Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections for refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence: do we need urodynamic investigation for outcome assessment? BJU Int. 2017;120(6):848–854.
  • Gasparini A, Evans M, Coresh J, et al. Prevalence and recognition of chronic kidney disease in Stockholm healthcare. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(12):2086–2094.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.