Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Urology Volume 56, 2022 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
79
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transition from open to robotically assisted approach on radical prostatectomies in Iceland. A nationwide, population-based study

Hilda Hrönn Gudmundsdottira Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland;b Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, IcelandCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9186-4266View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Arni Johnsenb Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, IcelandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1984-6749View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Jon Örn Fridrikssona Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland;c Department of Surgery, Akureyri Hospital, Akureyri, IcelandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-5769View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Rafn Hilmarssona Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, IcelandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-588XView further author information
ORCID Icon,
Eirikur Orri Gudmundssona Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, IcelandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-374XView further author information
ORCID Icon,
Sigurdur Gudjonssona Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, IcelandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-595XView further author information
ORCID Icon &
Eirikur Jonssona Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, IcelandView further author information
 show all
Pages 53-58 | Received 21 Jan 2021, Accepted 29 Oct 2021, Published online: 22 Nov 2021

References

  • Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2087–2093.
  • Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 2002;60(5):864–868.
  • Alemozaffar M, Sanda M, Yecies D, et al. Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the health professionals follow-up study. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):432–438.
  • Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):408–410.
  • Abbou C, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol. 2001;165(6 Pt 1):1964–1966.
  • Chang SL, Kibel AS, Brooks JD, et al. The impact of robotic surgery on the surgical management of prostate cancer in the USA. BJU Int. 2015;115(6):929–936.
  • Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M. Minimally invasive surgery: National trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(7):2253–2257.
  • Duffey B, Varda B, Konety B. Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(3):229–236.
  • Yaxley J, Coughlin G, Chambers S, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016;388(10049):1057–1066.
  • Pompe RS, Beyer B, Haese A, et al. Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems. BJU Int. 2018;122(5):801–807.
  • European Association of Urology [Internet]. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU – ESTRO – ESUR – SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer; [cited 2019 Feb 1]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/. 
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.
  • The Icelandic Cancer Society [Internet]. Reykjavik: treatment for prostate cancer [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.krabb.is/krabbameinsskra/upplysingar-um-krabbamein/krabbamein-a-o/blodruhalskirtill/.
  • Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1037–1063.
  • Basiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, et al. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? World J Urol. 2018;36(4):609–621.
  • Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):382–404.
  • Chung SD, Kelle JJ, Huang CY, et al. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt C):966–971.
  • Song W, Park JH, Jeon HG, et al. Comparison of oncologic outcomes and complications according to surgical approach to radical prostatectomy: special focus on the perineal approach. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(4):645–652.
  • Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology. 2010;75(5):1092–1097.
  • Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, et al. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? BJU Int. 2008;102(10):1413–1418.
  • Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology. 2005;66(6):1245–1250.
  • Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, et al. Positive surgical margins in Robotic-Assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2006;49(5):866–872.
  • Chuang A-Y, Epstein JI. Positive surgical margins in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ-confined disease at radical prostatectomy: Histologic features and pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(8):1201–1206.
  • Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol. 2010;183(3):990–996.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.