1,122
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

No self-evident interpretation of a randomized study

Pages 12-13 | Received 06 Dec 2021, Accepted 07 Dec 2021, Published online: 08 Jan 2022

References

  • Schmidt Andersen C, Thoft Jensen B, Nielsen Holck E, et al. Prospective versus retrospective recordings of comorbidities and complications in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy – a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Urol. 2021:1–6.
  • Greenland S, Morgenstern H. Confounding in health research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:189–212.
  • Rothman KJ. Six persistent research misconceptions. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(7):1060–1064.
  • Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(8):560–562.
  • Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(4):337–350.
  • Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311(7003):485.
  • Kaisa E, Veitonmäki T, Ettala O, et al. Does every Clavien-Dindo complication matter? A national multi-center study in kidney cancer surgery. Scand J Urol. 2021;55(6):441–447.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.