https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-7176
References
- Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, et al. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J. urol. 2012;187(4):1392–1398.
- Navaratnam A, Abdul-Muhsin H, Humphreys M. Updates in urologic robot assisted surgery. F1000Res. 2018;7:1948.
- Bingmer K, Ofshteyn A, Stein SL, et al. Decline of open surgical experience for general surgery residents. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):967–972.
- Cumpanas AA, Bardan R, Ferician OC, et al. Does previous open surgical experience have any influence on robotic surgery simulation exercises? Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12(4):366–371.
- McClelland TJ, Ford K, Dagash H, et al. Low-fidelity paediatric surgical simulation: description of models in low-resource settings. World J Surg. 2019;43(5):1193–1197.
- Egle JP, Malladi SV, Gopinath N, et al. Simulation training improves resident performance in hand-sewn vascular and bowel anastomoses. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(2):291–296.
- Ruurda JP, Broeders IA, Pulles B, et al. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(8):1249–1252.
- Hamad MA, Mentges B, Buess G. Laparoscopic sutured anastomosis of the bowel. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(11):1840–1844.
- Mashaud LB, Arain NA, Hogg DC, et al. Development, validation, and implementation of a cost-effective intermediate-level proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum for surgery residents. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(2):193–199.
- Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 1998;175(6):482–487.
- Sundelin MO, Silva JDC, Daele AV, et al. Urology simulation boot camp: a perspective from non-UK delegates. Actas Urol Esp. 2021;45(1):49–56.
- Moit H, Dwyer A, De Sutter M, et al. A standardized robotic training curriculum in a General Surgery Program. JSLS. 2019;23(4):e2019.00045.
- Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann. Surg. 2002;236(4):458–463. discussion 463–4.
- Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, et al. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg. 2007;193(3):349–355. Mardiscussion 355.
- Dawe SR, Pena GN, Windsor JA, et al. Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training. Br J Surg. 2014;101(9):1063–1076.
- Harbin AC, Nadhan KS, Mooney JH, et al. Prior video game utilization is associated with improved performance on a robotic skills simulator. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(3):317–324.
- Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Proctor T, et al. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(4):1656–1667.
- Paschold M, Schröder M, Kauff DW, et al. Virtual reality laparoscopy: which potential trainee starts with a higher proficiency level? Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2011;6(5):653–662.
- Fanning J, Fenton B, Johnson C, et al. Comparison of teenaged video gamers vs PGY-I residents in obstetrics and gynecology on a laparoscopic simulator. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(2):169–172.
- Ali A, Subhi Y, Ringsted C, et al. Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(11):3065–3073.
- Aeschlimann KA, Mann FA, Middleton JR, et al. Comparison of enterotomy leak pressure among fresh, cooled, and frozen-thawed porcine jejunal segments. Am J Vet Res. 2018;79(5):576–580.