Multicentric comparative analysis of Retzius versus Retzius sparing robotic assisted simple prostatectomy in the management of large prostate glands

References

• Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M, et al. EAU guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) 2020. European Association of Urology guidelines. 2020 edition. Volume presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology Guidelines Office; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons JK, Dahm P, Kohler TS, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline amendment 2020. J Urol. 2020;204(4):799–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokin I, Sundaram V, Singla N, et al. Robot-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands: a propensity score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1164–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(2):513–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordan Y, Canda AE, Köseoğlu E, et al. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review. JCM. 2020;9(6):1798.
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Qazi H, et al. Extraperitoneal approach for robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy. Urology. 2014; Nov84(5):1099–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68(1):86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie S, Abreu AL, Chopra S, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Concilio B, Silvestri T, Justich M, et al. A novel technique for robotic simple prostatectomy: an evolution of retzius-sparing technique. Urology. 2018;115:185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int. 2012 109(3):426–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo O, Vidal-Mora I, Rodriguez-Carlin A, et al. Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results. Prostate Int. 2016;4(2):61–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clavijo R, Carmona O, De Andrade R, et al. Robot-assisted intrafascial simple prostatectomy: novel technique. J Endourol. 2013;27(3):328–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias-Machado M, Pazeto CL, Faria EF, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with tunnel-shaped trigonization (RASP-TST) – a novel technique. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45(4):858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciamani G, Medina L, Ashrafi A, et al. Transvesical robot-assisted simple prostatectomy with 360° circumferential reconstruction: step-by-step technique . BJU Int. 2018;122(2):344–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Urethral-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: an innovative technique to preserve ejaculatory function overcoming the limitation of the standard Millin approach. Eur Urol. 2021;80(2):222–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschovas MC, Timoteo F, Lins L, et al. Robotic surgery techniques to approach benign prostatic hyperplasia disease: a comprehensive literature review and the state of art. Asian J Urol. 2021;8(1):81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom KJ, Folkvaljon Y, Loeb S, et al. Small bowel obstruction and abdominal pain after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(3):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbin AC, Kaplan JR, Desai AS. Posterior approach to robotic simple prostatectomy. Videourology. 2016;30(1).
   Google Scholar
• Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, et al. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33(4):563–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abi Chebel J, Sarkis J, El Helou E, et al. Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy in the era of laser enucleation for high-volume prostates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol. 2021;19(2):123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Shen P, He Q, et al. Different lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti M, Phillips J. Prostatectomy for benign prostate disease: open, laparoscopic and robotic techniques. Can J Urol. 2015;22(Suppl 1):60–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robles J, Pais V, Miller N. Mind the gaps: Adoption and underutilization of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the United States from 2008 to 2014. J Endourol. 2020;34(7):770–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince R, Hampton LJ, Vartolomei MD, et al. Robotic assisted simple prostatectomy: recent advances. Curr Opin Urol. 2018;28(3):309–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar