1,011
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Standardized care pathways for patients with suspected urinary bladder cancer: the Swedish experience

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 227-232 | Received 27 Oct 2021, Accepted 23 Mar 2022, Published online: 07 Apr 2022

References

  • Babjuk MB, Compérat E. EAU guidelines on non muscle invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2020:8–14.
  • Jahnson S, Hosseini Aliabad A, Holmang S, et al. Swedish National Registry of Urinary Bladder Cancer: no difference in relative survival over time despite more aggressive treatment. Scand J Urol. 2016;50(1):14–20.
  • Svenska nationella kvalitetsregistret för Urinblåse- och urinvägscancer (SNRUBC). 2021. Available from: https://statistik.incanet.se/Urinblasecancer/.
  • Shapley M, Mansell G, Jordan JL, et al. Positive predictive values of >/=5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(578):e366–e377.
  • Hansen RP, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, et al. Time intervals from first symptom to treatment of cancer: a cohort study of 2,212 newly diagnosed cancer patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:284.
  • Wallace DMA, Bryan RT, Dunn JA, et al. Delay and survival in bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2002;89(9):868–878.
  • Dobruch J, Daneshmand S, Fisch M, et al. Gender and bladder cancer: a collaborative review of etiology, biology, and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016;69(2):300–310.
  • Bourgade V, Drouin SJ, Yates DR, et al. Impact of the length of time between diagnosis and surgical removal of urologic neoplasms on survival. World J Urol. 2014;32(2):475–479.
  • Gore JL, Lai J, Setodji CM, et al. Mortality increases when radical cystectomy is delayed more than 12 weeks: results from a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis. Cancer. 2009;115(5):988–996.
  • Russell B, Liedberg F, Khan MS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of delay in radical cystectomy and the effect on survival in bladder cancer patients. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(2):239–249.
  • Blick C, Bailey D, Haldar N, et al. The impact of the two-week wait rule on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in a single UK institution. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(1):46–50.
  • Nilbert M, Blackberg M, Ceberg J, et al. Diagnostic pathway efficacy for urinary tract cancer: population-based outcome of standardized evaluation for macroscopic haematuria. Scand J Urol. 2018;52(4):237–243.
  • Malmström PU, Gårdmark T, Sherif A, et al. Incidence, survival and mortality trends of bladder cancer in Sweden 1997–2016. Scand J Urol. 2019;53(4):193–199.
  • Brierley J, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. Hoboken (NJ): JJohn Wiley and sons; 2017.
  • Busch C, Algaba F. The WHO/ISUP 1998 and WHO 1999 systems for malignancy grading of bladder cancer. Scientific foundation and translation to one another and previous systems. Virchows Arch. 2002;441(2):105–108.
  • McCombie SP, Bangash HK, Kuan M, et al. Delays in the diagnosis and initial treatment of bladder cancer in Western Australia. BJU Int. 2017;120:28–34.
  • Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56–72.
  • Harshman LC, Tripathi A, Kaag M, et al. Contemporary patterns of multidisciplinary care in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16(3):213–218.
  • Zhou Y, Walter FM, Singh H, et al. Prolonged diagnostic intervals as marker of missed diagnostic opportunities in bladder and kidney cancer patients with alarm features: a longitudinal linked data study. Cancers. 2021;13(1):156.
  • Chawla A, Westrich K, Dai A, et al. US care pathways: continued focus on oncology and outstanding challenges. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(6):280–287.
  • Waisbrod S, Natsos A, Wettstein MS, et al. Assessment of diagnostic yield of cystoscopy and computed tomographic urography for urinary tract cancers in patients evaluated for microhematuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e218409.
  • Linder BJ, Bass EJ, Mostafid H, et al. Guideline of guidelines: asymptomatic microscopic haematuria. BJU Int. 2018;121(2):176–183.
  • Malmstrom PU, Skaaheim Haug E, Bostrom PJ, et al. Progress towards a Nordic standard for the investigation of hematuria: 2019. Scand J Urol. 2019;53(1):1–6.
  • Hughes-Hallett A, Browne D, Mensah E, et al. Assessing the impact of mass media public health campaigns. Be clear on cancer ‘blood in pee’: a case in point. BJU Int. 2016;117(4):570–575.
  • Koo MM, Swann R, McPhail S, et al. Presenting symptoms of cancer and stage at diagnosis: evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(1):73–79.