53
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Interpretation of composite endpoints in urology: an analysis of citation quality

, , , , , & show all
Pages 206-212 | Received 06 Dec 2021, Accepted 23 Mar 2022, Published online: 11 Apr 2022

References

  • Palileo-Villanueva LM, Dans AL. Composite endpoints. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2020;128:P157–P158.
  • Mccoy CE. Understanding the use of composite endpoints in clinical trials. West. J. Emerg. Med. 2018;19(4):631–634.
  • Cannon CP. Clinical perspectives on the use of composite endpoints. Control Clin. Trials. 1997;18(6):517–529.
  • Ferreira-González I, Permanyer-Miralda G, Busse JW, et al. Methodologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited, but still identify major concerns. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2007;60(7):651–657.
  • Chi GYH. Some issues with composite endpoints in clinical trials. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2005;19:609–619.
  • Lavallée LT, Dahm P, Breau RH. Evidence-based urology in practice: composite endpoints. BJU Int. 2010;106(5):610–612.
  • Bowater RJ, Lilford RJ. Clinical effectiveness in cardiovascular trials in relation to the importance to the patient of the end-points measured. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2011;17:547–553.
  • Mottet N, Bastian P, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG: guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur. Assoc. Urol. 2020;79:1–182.
  • Witjes JA, Bruins M, Cathomas R, et al. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer 2020. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2020 Ed. 2020. Available from: http://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-invasive-and-metastatic/. LK – Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer Uroweb%7C. http://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-invasive-and-metastatic/%7C. FG – 0.
  • Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Bensalah K, et al. EAU guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU annual congress Amsterdam 2020. Eur. Urol. 2020;67:913–924.
  • Gravas S, Cornu J, Gacci M, et al. EAU guidelines on non-neurogenic male LUTS incl. BPO. Eur. Urol. 2020;67(6):1099–1109.
  • Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 2016;69(3):475–482.
  • EAU: EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health. Eur. Assoc. Urol. 2020;79:232.
  • Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, et al. Guidelines on bladder cancer (TaT1 and CIS). Eur. Urol. 2012;31:1–36.
  • Smith MR, Saad F, Coleman R, et al. Denosumab and bone metastasis-free survival in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: results of a global phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;379:39–46.
  • Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2525–2536.
  • Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Glen H, et al. Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(15):1473–1482.
  • McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;349(25):2387–2398.
  • Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J. Urol. 2005; 174:595–599.
  • Sønksen J, Barber NJ, Speakman MJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, multinational study of prostatic urethral lift versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 12-month results from the BPH6 study. Eur. Urol. 2015; 68:643–652.
  • Madan RA, Gulley JL. Prostate cancer: intermediate efficacy end points to assess modern therapies. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(12):686–687.
  • Lee GT, Kang DI, Ha YS, et al. Prostate cancer bone metastases acquire resistance to androgen deprivation via WNT5A-mediated BMP-6 induction. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110(6):1634–1644.
  • Bauchner H, Golub RM, Fontanarosa PB. Reporting and interpretation of randomized clinical trials. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2019;322:732–735.
  • Ferreira-González I, Busse JW, Heels-Ansdell D, et al. Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br. Med. J. 2007;334:786–788.
  • Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J, et al. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2003;289:2554–2559.
  • Cordoba G, Schwartz L, Woloshin S, et al. Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:381.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.