Intraoperative complications in kidney tumor surgery: critical grading for the European Association of Urology intraoperative adverse incident classification

References

• Biyani CS, Pecanka J, Roupret M, et al. Intraoperative adverse incident classification (EAUiaiC) by the European Association of Urology ad hoc complications guidelines panel. Eur Urol. 2020;77(5):601–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satava RM, Fried MP. A methodology for objective assessment of errors: an example using an endoscopic sinus surgery simulator. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002;35(6):1289–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazaryan AM, Rosok BI, Edwin B. Morbidity assessment in surgery: refinement proposal based on a concept of perioperative adverse events. ISRN Surg. 2013;2013:625093.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaafarani HM, Mavros MN, Hwabejire J, et al. Derivation and validation of a novel severity classification for intraoperative adverse events. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(6):1120–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Clavien PA, et al. Definition and classification of intraoperative complications (CLASSIC): delphi study and pilot evaluation. World J Surg. 2015;39(7):1663–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandaglia G, Bravi CA, Dell’Oglio P, et al. The impact of implementation of the european association of urology guidelines panel recommendations on reporting and grading complications on perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;74(1):4–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Biyani CS, et al. Validation of the Clavien–Dindo grading system in urology by the European Association of Urology guidelines ad hoc panel. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(4):608–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cacciamani GE, Tafuri A, Iwata A, et al. Quality assessment of intraoperative adverse event reporting during 29 227 robotic partial nephrectomies: a systematic review and cumulative analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(6):780–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frydman V, Pinar U, Abdessater M, et al. Long-term outcomes after penile prosthesis placement for the management of erectile dysfunction: a single-centre experience. Basic Clin Androl. 2021;31(1):4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Pello S, Verma N, Kuusk T, et al. Impact of body mass index on upper urinary tract and renal robot‐assisted surgery: a single high‐volume centre Experience. J Robotic Surg. 2022;16(3):611–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparwasser P, Epple S, Thomas A, et al. First completely robot-assisted retroperitoneal nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff: a step-by-step technique. World J Urol. 2022;40(4):1019–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson Comorbidity Index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL, et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the Renal Nephrometry Score. Eur Urol. 2011;60(2):241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves RJ, Zincke H. Surgical treatment of renal cancer with vena cava extension. Br J Urol. 1987;59(5):390–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erkkilä K, Veitonmaki T, Ettala O, et al. Does every Clavien-Dindo complication matter? A national multi-center study in kidney cancer surgery. Scand J Urol. 2021;55(6):441–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson BL, Fowler S, Williams ST, British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) – Section of Oncology. Perioperative outcomes of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the UK in 2012. BJU Int. 2015;116(6):905–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the international study group of liver surgery (ISGLS). HPB. 2011;13(8):528–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Wexner SD, Safar B, et al. Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome? Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2454–2458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel E, Campi R, Larcher A, Young Academic Urologists Renal Cell Carcinoma Working Group, et al. Rates and predictors of perioperative complications in cytoreductive nephrectomy: Analysis of the registry for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(4):523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozek-Langenecker SA, Afshari A, Albaladejo P, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(6):270–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM, et al. Complications of 2,775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol. 2007;177(2):580–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardas M, Stewart F, Scrimgeour D, et al. Systematic review of surgical management of nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma with vena caval thrombus. Eur Urol. 2016;70(2):265–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcaniolo D, Manfredi C, Cindolo L, et al. Impact of perioperative blood transfusions on the outcomes of patients undergoing kidney cancer surgery: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):e72–e79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodoussipour S, Ahmadi N, Hartman N, et al. Factors influencing intraoperative conversion from planned orthotopic to non-orthotopic urinary diversion during radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2019;37(9):1851–1855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winoker JS, Paulucci DJ, Anastos H, et al. Predicting complications following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the ACS NSQIP® Universal Surgical Risk Calculator. J Urol. 2017;198(4):803–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciamani GE, Gill T, Medina L, et al. Impact of host factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2018;200(4):716–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstenson A, Bergman M, Scherman-Plogell AH, et al. Tumour characteristics and surgical treatment of renal cell carcinoma in Sweden 2005-2010: a population-based study from the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register. Scandinavian J Urol. 2014;48(3):231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais J, Bertolo R, Garisto J, et al. Variability in partial nephrectomy outcomes: does your surgeon matter? Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):628–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciamani GE, Sholklapper T, Dell’Oglio P, et al. The intraoperative complications assessment and reporting with universal standards (ICARUS) global surgical collaboration project: development of criteria for reporting adverse events during surgical procedures and evaluating their impact on the postoperative course. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.018.
   Google Scholar