Surgeon volume and patient-reported urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Population-based register study in Sweden

References

• Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(5):436–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1250–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):405–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):559–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trieu D, Ju IE, Chang SB, et al. Surgeon case volume and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(4):521–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardas M, Grivas N, Debray TPA, et al. Patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for urinary incontinence After radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(3):674–689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godtman RA, Persson E, Cazzaniga W, et al. Association of surgeon and hospital volume with short-term outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: nationwide, population-based study. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomic K, Sandin F, Wigertz A, et al. Evaluation of data quality in the national prostate cancer register of Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(1):101–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazzaniga W, Godtman RA, Carlsson S, et al. Population-based, nationwide registration of prostatectomies in Sweden. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120(4):803–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Hemelrijck M, Wigertz A, Sandin F, et al. Cohort profile: the national prostate cancer register of Sweden and prostate cancer data base Sweden 2.0. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(4):956–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The national prostate cancer register of Sweden, NPCR. 2021. Available from: https://statistik.incanet.se/npcr/
   Google Scholar
• The confederation of Regional Cancer Centres (RCC). National prostate cancer guidelines (In Swedish). Version 6.1 [cited 22-09-2021]. 2021. Available from: https://kunskapsbanken.cancercentrum.se/globalassets/cancerdiagnoser/prostatacancer/vardprogram/nationellt-vardprogram-prostatacancer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren S. Flexible imputation of missing data. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Imputation of nonresponse in surveys. New York (NY): Wiley; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ. Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med. 2005;24(8):1185–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nossiter J, Morris M, Cowling TE, et al. Hospital volume and outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a national population-based study using patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00443-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry MG, Skolarus TA, Nossiter J, et al. Urinary incontinence and use of incontinence surgery after radical prostatectomy: a national study using patient-reported outcomes. BJU Int. 2021;130:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collette ERP, Klaver SO, Lissenberg-Witte BI, et al. Patient reported outcome measures concerning urinary incontinence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy: development and validation of an online prediction model using clinical parameters, lower urinary tract symptoms and surgical experience. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(4):593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam RK, Herschorn S, Loblaw DA, et al. Population based study of long-term rates of surgery for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(2):502–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG. Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):777–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivas N, Zachos I, Georgiadis G, et al. Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review. World J Urol. 2021;40:929–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossati N, Di Trapani E, Gandaglia G, et al. Assessing the impact of surgeon experience on urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of four high-volume surgeons. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):872–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JE, Egger S, Bohm M, et al. Superior biochemical recurrence and long-term quality-of-life outcomes are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy After a long learning Curve-Updated analysis of a prospective single-surgeon cohort of 2206 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2018;73(5):664–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg M, Sjoberg DD, Carlsson SV, et al. Surgeon heterogeneity significantly affects functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the swedish LAPPRO trial. BJU Int. 2021;127(3):361–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction After robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68(2):216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michl U, Tennstedt P, Feldmeier L, et al. Nerve-sparing surgery technique, not the preservation of the neurovascular bundles, leads to improved long-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):584–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar