717
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial Comment

Register-based research. Accurate data and analysis, crucial for correct conclusions. Comment on “Incidence, mortality, and relative survival of patients with cancer of the bladder and upper urothelial tract in the Nordic countries between 1990 and 2019”

Pages 22-23 | Received 20 Nov 2022, Accepted 25 Nov 2022, Published online: 08 Dec 2022

References

  • Karttunen E, Hervonen P, Hosseini A, et al. Incidence, mortality, and relative survival of patients with cancer of the bladder and upper urothelial tract in the Nordic countries between 1990 and 2019. Scand J. Urol. 2022:2022:1–7.
  • Roupret M, Babjuk M, Comperat E, et al. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2017 update. Eur Urol. 2018;73(1):111–122.
  • Green DA, Rink M, Xylinas E, et al. Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper tract: disparate twins. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1214–1221.
  • Sfakianos JP, Cha EK, Iyer G, et al. Genomic characterization of upper tract urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015;68(6):970–977.
  • Hassler MR, Bray F, Catto JWF, et al. Molecular characterization of upper tract urothelial Carcinoma in the era of next-generation sequencing: a systematic review of the current literature. Eur Urol. 2020;78(2):209–220.
  • Fujii Y, Sato Y, Suzuki H, et al. Molecular classification and diagnostics of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(6):793–809.e8.
  • Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, et al. European association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive BladderCancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2022;81(1):75–94.
  • Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, et al. European association of urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic Bladder cancer: summary of the 2020 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):82–104.
  • Holmäng S, Johansson SL. Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: comparison between the WHO/ISUP 1998 consensus classification and WHO 1999 classification system. Urology. 2005;66(2):274–278.
  • Liedberg F, Lauss M, Patschan O, et al. The importance of being grade 3: WHO 1999 versus WHO 2004 pathologic grading. Eur Urol. 2012;62(4):620–623.
  • van Rhijn BWG, Hentschel AE, Bründl J, et al. Prognostic value of the WHO1973 and WHO2004/2016 classification systems for grade in primary Ta/T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter european association of urology non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer guidelines panel study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):182–191.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.