Supporting Rural Livelihoods and Ecosystem Services Conservation in the Pico Duarte Coffee Region of the Dominican Republic

REFERENCES

• Bacon, C. M. 2005. Confronting the coffee crisis: Can fair trade, organic and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua. World Development 33:497–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, C. M., V. E. Méndez, S. R. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. A. Fox, eds. 2008. Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analysing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27:2012–2044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A. J., and S. P. J. Batterbury. 2001. Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: Political ecologies of globalization. Ecumene 8:369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, L. E., T. A. Gavin, N. T. Uphoff, and D. R. Lee. 2007. Scientific assessment of ecoagriculture systems. In Farming with nature: the science and practice of ecoagriculture, eds. S. J. Scherr and J. A. McNeely, 20–45. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, L. E., J. A. Milder, T. A. Gavin, and I. Mukherjee. 2006. Understanding ecoagriculture: A framework for measuring landscape performance. Ecoagriculture Discussion Paper no. 2. EcoAgriculture Partners, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, D., ed. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: What contribution can we make? London: Department for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., and G. Conway. 1992. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (Discussion Paper 296). Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, R. K. 2010. Estimates: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2.5, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut. from ://purl.oclc.org/estimates (accessed November 15, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe. 2002. Centroamerica. El impacto de la caidea de los precios del café (LC/MEX/L.517). Mexico, DF: CEPAL.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., N. Kosoy, and M. Martínez Tuna. 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: Case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 17:365–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., R. D’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s environmental services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, G. C., S. Alexander, P. R. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P. A. Matson, et al. 1997. Ecosystem services: Benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Ecological Society of America 2.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E., and J. Farley. 2004. Ecological economics: Principles and application. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, R. 1992. Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Groningen, the Natherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, F. 1998. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies 35:1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, F. 2000. Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galtier, F., and I. Batista. 2008. Estudio de la cadena de comercializacion del café en la Republica Dominicana. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Instituto Dominicano de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales.
   Google Scholar
• Galtier F., G. Belletti, and A. Marescotti. 2008. Are geographical indications a way to “decommodify” the coffee market? 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), Wageningen UR, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Galtier, F., P. del Rosario, J. Camilo, U. Santos, J. Romero, H. Jiménez, et al. 2007. Caracterización socioeconómica de las empresas cafetaleras en la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Instituto Dominicano de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales.
   Google Scholar
• Geisler, C., R. Warne, and A. Barton. 1997. The wandering commons: a conservation conundrum in the Dominican Republic. Agriculture and Human Values 14:325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Giovannucci, D. 2003. The state of sustainable coffee: A study of twelve major markets. Cali, Columbia: CINECAFE.
   Google Scholar
• Hairiah, K., H. Sulistyani, D. Suprayogo, Widianto, P. Purnomosidhi, R. H. Widodo, and M. Van Noordwijk. 2006. Litter layer residence time in forest and coffee agroforestry systems in Sumberjaya, West Lampung. Forest Ecology and Management 224(1):45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heindrichs, T. 2008. Pagos por servicios ambientales en PROCARYN. Programa Gestión de Recursos Naturales Cooperación Técnica Alemana. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Dominicano de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales. 2006. Diagnóstico y Plan de la Caficultura Dominicana. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: CODOCAFE.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, S., C. M. Bacon, S. M. Philpott, R. Rice, V. E. Méndez and P. Laderach. 2011. A review of ecosystem services and farmer livelihoods in shade cofffee agroecosystems. In Integrating agriculture, conservation, and ecotourism: Examples from the field, eds. B. W. Campbell and S. Lopez Ortiz, vol. 1, 141–208 (Issues in Agroecology Series). New York: Springer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, S., and N. Cuéllar. 2011. Compensation for ecosystem services: Directions, potentials and pitfalls for rural communities ( Policy Brief). Salvadoran Research Program on Development and Environment (PRISMA), San Salvador, El Salvador.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, L. M., Horn, S. P., and Orvis, K. H. 2006. A 4000-year record of fire and forest history from Valle de Bao, Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 231:279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latta, S., C. Rimmer, A. Keith, J. Wiley, H. Raffaele, K. McFarland, et al. 2008. Birds of the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latta, S. C. 2005. Complementtary areas for conserving avian diversity on Hispaniola. Animal conservation 8:69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B. B., I. Perfecto, and J. Vandermeer. 2008. Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerabilities for crops. Bioscience 58:847–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., T. Dietz, S. R. Carpenter, M. Alberti, C. Folke, E. Moran, et al. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, R. 2001. Rural poverty in Dominican Republic: Market failures, government failures and new policies. In Dominican Republic poverty assessment: Poverty in a High-growth economy (1986–2000), Vol. II. (Report No. 21306-DR). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Torres, M. E. 2006. Organic coffee: Sustainable development by Mayan Farmers. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E. 2008. Farmer livelihoods and biodiversity conservation in a coffee landscape of El Salvador. In Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair Trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America, eds. C. M. Bacon, V. E. Mendez, S. R. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. A. Fox, 207–236. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, M. Olson, K. S. Morris, and A. K. Shattuck. 2010. Agrobiodiversity and shade coffee smallholder livelihoods: A review and synthesis of ten years of research in Central America. Professional Geographer 62:357–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, M. Olson, S. Petchers, D. Herrador, C. Carranza, et al. 2010. Effects of fair trade and organic certifications on small-scale coffee farmer households in Central America and Mexico. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:23–251.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., S. Castro-Tanzi, K. Goodall, K. S. Morris, C. M. Bacon, P. Läderach, et al. 2012. Livelihood and environmental tradeoffs of climate mitigation in smallholder coffee agroforestry systems. In Climate change mitigation and agriculture, eds. E. K. Wollenberg, A. Nihart, M. Grieg-Gran, and M. L. Tapio-Biström, 370–381. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., S. R. Gliessman, and G. S. Gilbert. 2007. Tree biodiversity in farmer cooperatives of a she coffee landscape in western El Salvador. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119:145–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., E. N. Shapiro, and G. S. Gilbert. 2009. Cooperative management and its effects on shade tree diversity, soil properties and ecosystem services of coffee plantations in western El Salvador. Agroforestry Systems 76:111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milder, J. C., L. E. Buck, F. A. DeClerck, and S. J. Scherr. 2011. Landscape approaches to achieving food production, conservation, and the Millennium Development Goals. In Integrating Ecology and Poverty Reduction, eds. F. A. DeClerck, J. C. Ingram, and C. Rumbaitis del Rio, ch. 2.1.4. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milder, J. C., S. J. Scherr, and C. Bracer. 2010. Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and Society 15, Article no. 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moguel, P., and P. M. Toledo. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems in Mexico. Conservation Biology 13:11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oficina Nacional de Planificación. 2005. Mapa de la Pobreza en la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: ONAPLAN.
   Google Scholar
• Oficina Nacional de Estadistica de la Republica Dominicana. 2012. Censo 2012 de Población y Vivienda. Nacional de Estadistica http://www.one.gob.do/Oficina (accessed July 21, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Parks in Peril Program. 1997. Initial site work plan. Madres de Las Aguas Conservation Area. Cordillera Central, Dominican Republic. United States Agency for International Development and the Nature Conservancy, USAID–Washington, DC/TNC–Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., R. A. Rice, R. Greenberg, and M. E. van der Voort. 1996. Shade coffee: A disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 46:598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2008. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: A new paradigm. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1134:173–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer, A. Mas, and L. Soto-Pinto. 2005. Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecological Economics 5:435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., J. H. Vandermeer, and A. L. Wright. 2009. Nature’s matrix: linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Petchers, S., and H. Harris. 2008. The roots of the coffee crisis. In Confronting the coffee crisis: Fair Trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America, eds. C. M. Bacon, V. E. Méndez, S. R. Gliessman, D. Goodman, and J. A. Fox, 43–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, S. M., W. J. Arendt, I. Ambrecht, P. Bichier, T. V. Dietsch, C. Gordon. 2008. Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: Review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conservation Biology 22:1093–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott, S. M., P. Bichier, R. Rice, and R. Greenberg. 2007. Field testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs. Conservation Biology 21:975–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philpott S. M., B. B. Lin, S. Jha, and S. J. Brines. 2008. A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 128:12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponette-González, A. G., Marín-Spiotta, E., Brauman, K. A., Farley, K. A., Weathers, K. C., and Young, K. R. 2014. Hydrologic connectivity in the high-elevation tropics: Heterogeneous responses to land change. BioScience 64(2):92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Program on Forests. 2009. Poverty Forest Linkages Toolkit. Washington, DC: Program on Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Programa Salvadoreño de Investigación sobre Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente. 2003. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities. San Salvador: PRISMA.
   Google Scholar
• Quintero, M., S. Wunder, and R. D. Estrada. 2009. For services rendered? Modeling hydrology and livelihoods in Andean payments for environmental services schemes. Forest Ecology and Management 256:1871–1880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapidel, B., F. DeClerck, J.-F. Le Coq, and J. Beer, eds. 2011. Ecosystem services from agriculture and agroforestry. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, T. 1997. Using evidence of household income diversification to inform study of the rural nonfarm labor market in Africa. World Development 16:735–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M., A. J. Dougill. and T. R. Baker. 2008. Participatory indicator development: What can ecologists and local communities learn from each other? Ecological Applications 18:253–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2004. Political ecology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, J., B. Campbell, L. Petheram, M. Aldrich, M. Ruiz Perez, D. Endamana, et al. 2007. Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:2677–2694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, S. J., and J. A. McNeely. 2008. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’ landscapes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363:477–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, P., and P. Alwang. 2003. Analyses of data from survey of coffee and cocoa producers in the Dominican Republic. Draft paper prepared for the Commodity Risk Management Group (CRMG), Agriculture and Rural Development Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, D., and S. Wunder. 2009. Paying for watershed services in Latin America: A review of current initiatives. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28:497–524.
   Google Scholar
• Suyanto, S., N. Khususiyah, and B. Leimona. 2007. Poverty and environmental services: case study in Way Besai watershed, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Ecology and Society 12(2):13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., and Chang, A. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 105:9457–9464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. E., A. Yunez-Naude, N. Jesurun-Clements, J. De los Santos, M. Filipski, and J. Paulino. 2008. Posibles efectos de la liberalizacion comercial en los hogares rurales, a partir de un modelo desagregado para la economia rural, con enfasis en la probreza, el genero y la migracion. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, V. M., and P. Moguel. 2012. Coffee and sustainability: The multiple values of traditional shaded coffee. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36:353–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Agency for International Development. 2013. Dominican Republic climate change vulnerability assessment report. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Washington, DC. http://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1862/Dominican%20Republic%20Climate%20Change%20Vulnerability%20Assessment%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandermeer, J., and I. Perfecto. 2007. The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation. Conservation Biology 21:274–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Noordwijk, M., and B. Leimona 2010. Principles for fairness and efficiency in enhancing environmental services in Asia: Payments, compensation, or co-investment? Ecology and Society 15(4):17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet, N. 2010. Participatory vulnerability assessment in the context of conservation and development projects: a case study of local communities in Southwest Cameroon. Ecology and Society 15, Article no. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Varangis, P., P. Siegel, D. Giovannucci, and B. Lewin. 2003. Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America: Impacts and strategies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M., and D. Peet, eds. 2004. Liberation ecologies, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wells M. P, and T. O. McShane, eds. 2004. Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2009. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.ENRR (accessed February 14, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. 2008. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics 13:279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderle, J. M. 1999. Avian distribution in Dominican shade coffee plantations: Area and habitat relationships (Distribución de Aves en Algunas Plantaciónes de Café de Sombra en la República Dominicana: Relaciones Entre Área y Habitat). Journal of Field Ornithology 70(1):58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderle, J. M., and S. C. Latta. 1998. Avian resource use in Dominican shade coffee plantations. Wilson Bulletin 110:271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, K. S. 2007. Agriculture, livelihoods, and globalization: The analysis of new trajectories (and avoidance of just-so stories) of human-environment change and conservation. Agriculture and Human Values 24:9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, K., S., and Basset, T. J. 2003. Political ecology: An integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar