Seed and Plant Breeding for Wisconsin’s Organic Vegetable Sector: Understanding Farmers’ Needs

REFERENCES

• Adam, Katherine L. 2005. Seed production and variety development for organic systems (Report IP272). Butte, MT: National Center for Appropriate Technology. https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/viewhtml.php?id=70
   Google Scholar
• Almekinders, C. J. M., and N. P. Louwaars. 2002. The importance of the farmers’ seed systems in a functional national seed sector. Journal of New Seeds 4(1–2):15 –33.
   Google Scholar
• Almekinders, C. J. M., G. Thiele, and D. L. Danial. 2006. Can cultivars from participatory plant breeding improve seed provision to small-scale farmers? Euphytica 153(3):363 –372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishaw, Z., and M. Turner. 2008. Linking participatory plant breeding to the seed supply system. Euphytica 163(1):31 –44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, S., and S. Grando. 2006. Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: An example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155(3):349 –360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, M. R., and J. R. Myers. 2007. On-farm variety trials: A guide for organic vegetable, herb, and flower producers. Port Townsend, WA: Organic Seed Alliance (OSA). https://seedalliance.org/publications
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. C., P. Rivière, J.-F. Berthellot, F. Mercier, P. de Kochko, N. Galic, S. Pin, et al. 2011. Collaborative plant breeding for organic agricultural systems in developed countries. Sustainability 3(8):1206 –1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desclaux, D., J. M. Nolot, Y. Chiffoleau, E. Gozé, and C. Leclerc. 2008. Changes in the concept of genotype × environment interactions to fit agriculture diversification and decentralized participatory plant breeding: Pluridisciplinary point of view. Euphytica 163:533 –546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M., and K. Hubbard. 2011. State of organic seed report. Port Townsend, WA: Organic Seed Alliance. www.seedalliance.org.
   Google Scholar
• Duvick, D. N. 2009. Selection methods. Part 3: Hybrid breeding. In Plant breeding and farmer participation, 229 –258. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Glenna, L. L., R. A. Jussaume, and J. C. Dawson. 2010. How farmers matter in shaping agricultural technologies: Social and structural characteristics of wheat growers and wheat varieties. Agriculture and Human Values 28(2):213 –224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 2004. The trouble with ‘organic lite’in California: A rejoinder to the ‘conventionalisation’debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44(3):301 –316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, J., R. Dismukes, W. Chambers, C. Greene, and A. Kremen. 2004. Risk and risk management in organic agriculture: Views of organic farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(4):218 –227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartemink, A. E., B. Lowery, and C. Wacker. 2012. Soil maps of Wisconsin. Geoderma 189–190:451 –461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. H. 2009. Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability 1(4):1266 –1287.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, K. 2009. Out of hand: Farmers face the consequences of a consolidated seed industry. Stoughton, WI: National Family Farm Coalition. http://www.farmertofarmercampaign.org
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J. R. 2004. First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000, 2nd ed. Science and Technology in Society. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lammerts van Bueren, E. T., S. S. Jones, L. Tamm, K. M. Murphy, J. R. Myers, C. Leifert, and M. Messmer. 2011. The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review. NJAS—Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 58(3–4):193 –205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, M.-H. 2004, March 5. Seed: The Achilles’ heel of organic [blog]. Rodale Institute. http://rodaleinstitute.org/2004/seed-the-achilles-heel-of-organic/
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M., Do. Lammer, S. Lyon, B. Carter, and S. S. Jones. 2005. Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary–participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20(1):48 –55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. M., K. G. Campbell, S. R. Lyon, and S. S. Jones. 2007. Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Research 102(3):172 –177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navazio, J. 2012. The organic seed grower: A farmer’s guide to vegetable seed production. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
   Google Scholar
• Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York. 2004. Organic breeding survey 2004. Rochester, NY: Northeast Organic Farming Assocation of New York. http://www.plbr.cornell.edu/psi/OSPbreedingsurvey.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oregon State University. 2014. eOrganic—NOVIC. eOrganic. http://eorganic.info/novic/
   Google Scholar
• Organic Seed Alliance. 2012. Southeast seed stakeholders survey report. Port Townsend, WA: Organic Seed Alliance. http://seedalliance.org/southeast
   Google Scholar
• Quaday, T., M. Dillon, E. Walz, A. Kimbrell, K. Hubbard, and J. Sooby. 2011. Organic seed: An emerging industry, a pressing need. Organic Farming Research Foundation Information Bulletin 18:6 –19.
   Google Scholar
• Raeburn, P. 1995. The last harvest: The genetic gamble that threatens to destroy American agriculture. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Serpolay, E., N. Schermann, J. C. Dawson, E. T. Lammerts van Bueren, I. Goldringer, and V. Chable. 2011. Phenotypic changes in different spinach varieties grown and selected under organic conditions. Sustainability 3(9):1616 –1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, A. C. 2014. Plant breeding for organic agriculture in the United States: A new paradigm. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E., L. Paine, M. Barnidge, C. Carusi, and R. McNair. 2012. Organic agriculture in Wisconsin: 2012 status report. Madison, WI: Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems. http://www.cias.wisc.edu/organic-agriculture-in-wisconsin-2012-status-report/
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. P, H. Teran, M. Lema, and R. Hayes. 2011. Selection for dry bean yield on-station versus on-farm conventional and organic production systems. Crop Science 51:621 –630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sooby, J., J. Landneck, and M. Lipson. 2007. 2007 National organic research agenda. Santa Cruz, CA: Organic Farming Research Foundation. http://www.ofrf.org/research/additional-resources
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. 2013. Stata Statistical software: Release 2013. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
   Google Scholar
• Tin, H. Q., N. H. Cuc, T. T. Be, N. Ignacio, and T. Berg. 2011. Impacts of seed clubs in ensuring local seed systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35(8):840 –854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, W. F. 2014. Food security and the role of public cultivar development. In Proceedings of the 2014 Summit on Seeds and Breeds for 21st Century Agriculture, eds. William Tracy and Michael Sligh. Washington, DC: Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI). http://rafiusa.org/docs/2014SummitProceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2008. 2007 Census of agriculture: Organic production survey (Report AC-07-SS-2). Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2009. 2007 Census of agriculture. Table 49: Selected operator characteristics for principal, second, and third operator (Report AC-07-A-51). Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012. 2011 Certified organic production survey. Washington, DC: National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/Organic_Production_Survey/
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. National Organic Program. 2000. U.S. Code: Title 7. Part 205—National Organic Program. Subpart C—Organic production and handling requirements, vol. §205.204, seeds and planting stock practice standard. Washington, DC: USDA–NOP.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. National Organic Program. 2013. Guidance: Seeds, annual seedlings, and planting stock in organic crop production (Report NOP 5029). Washington, DC: National Organic Program. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5102731
   Google Scholar
• Vernooy, R. 2003. Seeds that give: Participatory plant breeding. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Walz, Erica. 2004. Final results of the Fourth National Organic Farmers’ Survey: Sustaining organic farms in a changing organic marketplace. Santa Cruz, CA: Organic Farming Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Weebadde, C., and C. Mensah. 2006. Report of Breakout Group 2. How will we provide improved varieties of specialty minor and subsistence crops in the future? HortScience 41(1):55 –55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., and B. Connolly. 2011. Breeding organic vegetables: A step-by-step guide for growers, 1st ed. Rochester, NY: Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York, Inc.
   Google Scholar