From change to transition? Learning from environmental protection activities in Sweden

References

• 2006/144/EC. “Council decision of 20 February 2006 on community strategic guidelines for rural development (programming period 2007 to 2013).”L 55/20.
   Google Scholar
• Alrøe, H. F., and E. S. Kristensen. 2004. Why have basic principles for organic agriculture?… and what kind of principles should they be? Ecology & Farming 36:27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, F., and D. Viaggi. 2013. The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size. Land Use Policy 31:126–35. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. 2007. Building on the positive-an actor innovation systems approach to finding and promoting pro poor natural resources institutional and technical innovations. International Journal of Agricultural Resources Governance and Ecology 6 (2):144–64. doi:10.1504/IJARGE.2007.012701.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, W., J. Ahnström, and L. Hallgren. 2011. Swedish farmers talking about nature - a study of the interrelations between farmers’ values and the sociocultural notion of naturintressse. Sociologia Ruralis 51 (4):420–35. doi:10.1111/soru.2011.51.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R., C. Kuczera, and G. Schwarz. 2008. Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociologia Ruralis 48 (1):16–37. doi:10.1111/soru.2008.48.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, R. J. F. 2004. Seeing through the ‘good farmer’s’ eyes: Towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of ‘productivist’ behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis 44:195–215. doi:10.1111/soru.2004.44.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K., C. Blackmore, D. Morris, and D. Watson. 2007. A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: Some findings from three UK case studies. Environmental Science & Policy 10:564–74. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, J., C. Blackmore, S. Chimbuya, K. Collins, M. Dent, J. Goss, R. Ison, P. P. Roggero, and G. Seddaiu. 2014. In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry. Research Policy 43 (4):760–71. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, G. R. 1987. The properties of agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems 24:95–117. doi:10.1016/0308-521X(87)90056-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I., S. Bellon, B. Dedieu, and R. Milestad. 2010a. Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30 (3):545–55. doi:10.1051/agro/2009053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I., J. Fairweather, and H. Moller. 2010. Assessing a farm’s sustainability: Insights from resilience thinking. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8 (3):186–98. doi:10.3763/ijas.2010.0480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I., T. Lindenthal, R. Bartel-Kratochvil, and W. Zollitsch. 2010b. Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: From structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30 (1):67–81. doi:10.1051/agro/2009011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, S., and T. Rydberg. 2002. Ecosystem properties and principles of living systems as foundation for sustainable agriculture- Critical reviews of environmental assessment tools, key findings and questions from a course process. In Ekologiskt Lantbruk 32. Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Eksvärd, K. 2010. Facilitating systemic research and learning and the transition to agricultural sustainability. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 16 (3):265–80. doi:10.1080/1389224x.2010.502759.
   Google Scholar
• Eksvärd, K. L., S. C. Francis, G. Tesfay, Z. Abraha, S. T. Kiggundu, and M. M. Nassuuna. 2014. Narrowing the gap between academia and practice through agroecology: Designing education and planning for action. NACTA Journal (June):148–54.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Overview of CAP reform 2014-2020. Agricultural Brief on CAP 5. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Firbank, L. G. 2005. Striking a new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology 146:163–75. doi:10.1111/aab.2005.146.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, C., G. Lieblein, S. Gliessman, T. A. Breland, N. Creamer, R. Harwood, L. Salomonsson, J. Helenius, D. Rickerl, R. Salvador, M. Wiedenhoeft, S. Simmons, P. Allen, M. Altieri, C. Flora, and R. Poincelot. 2003. Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22 (3):99–118. doi:10.1300/J064v22n03_10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez de Molina, M. 2013. Agroecology and politics. How to get sustainability? About the necessity for a political agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1):45–59. doi:10.1080/10440046.2012.705810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granvik, M., G. Lindberg, K.-A. Stigzelius, E. Fahlbeck, and Y. Surry. 2012. Prospects of multifunctional agriculture as a facilitator of sustainable rural development: Swedish experience of Pillar 2 of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography 66 (3):155–66. doi:10.1080/00291951.2012.681684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a crossroads global summary for decision makers. Washington DC: International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R. 2010. Systems practice: How to act in a climate change world. The Open University in association with Springer-Verlag London Limted.
   Google Scholar
• Jordbruksverket. 2010. Kontrollinstruktion för arealbaserade kontroller 2010 version 2. edited by Jordbruksverket, Jönköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Jordbruksverket. 2016. Miljöersättningar. http://www.jordbruksverket.se/amnesomraden/stod/jordbrukarstod/miljoersattningar/betesmarkerochslatterangar/villkor.4.4dfd5d3a1526082877c7e1fd.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lampkin, N. H., B. D. Pearce, A. R. Leake, H. Creissen, C. L. Gerrard, R. Girling, S. Lloyd, S. Padel, J. Smith, L. G. Smith, A. Vieweger, and M. S. Wolfe. 2015. The role of agroecology in sustainable intensification. In Report for the Land Use Policy Group. UK: Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm and Game & Wildlife Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Landsbygdsdepartementet. 2012. Landsbygdsprogram för Sverige 2007-2013. Stockholm, Sweden: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. North Carolina, USA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., and J. Rotmans. 2006. Managing transitions for sustainable development. In Understanding Industrial Transformation Views From different disciplines, ed X. Olsthoorn, and A. Wieczorek, 187–206. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2011. Food system sustainability: Questions of environmental governance in the new world (dis)order. Global Environmental Change 21 (3):804–12. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, V. E., C. M. Bacon, and R. Cohen. 2016. Introduction: Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. In Agroecology a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach, ed V. E. Méndez, C. M. Bacon, R. Cohen, and S. R. Gliessman, 1–21. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Öhlund, E., K. Zurek, and M. Hammer. 2015. Towards sustainable agriculture? The EU framework and local adaptation in Sweden and Poland. Environmental Policy and Governance 25 (4):270–87. doi:10.1002/eet.1687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. 1995. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23 (8):1247–63. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röling, N., J. Jiggins, D. Hounkonnou, and A. van Huis. 2014. Agricultural research – from recommendation domains to arenas for interaction: Experiences from West Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 43 (3):179–85. doi:10.5367/oa.2014.0172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M., B. B. Lichtenstein, K. Kaeufer, H. Bradbury, and J. Carroll. 2007. Collaborating for systemic change. MIT Sloan Management Review Winter 48 (2).
   Google Scholar
• SLU. 2010. Redovisning av uppdrag om halvtidsutvärdering av landsbygdsprogram för Sverige 2007-2013. Uppsala : Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockstrom, S. E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E. M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S. R. Carpenter, W. de Vries, C. A. de Wit, C. Folke, D. Gerten, J. Heinke, G. M. Mace, L. M. Persson, V. Ramanathan, B. Reyers, and S. Sorlin. 2015. Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223):1259855. doi:10.1126/science.1259855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar