Milk and the city: Raw milk challenging the value claims of value chains

References

• AECF. 2011. Tanga fresh. Online. Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund. Nairobi: Kenya
   Google Scholar
• Arce, A., and N. Long. 2000. Reconfiguring modernity and development from an anthropological perspective. In Anthropology, development and modernities, edited by A. Arce, and N. Long, 1–31. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ASAS, Group of Companies. 2015. “ASAS Group of Companies.” ASAS Group of Companies, accessed 3rd April. http://asasgrouptz.com/new/.
   Google Scholar
• Bakresha Group Ltd. 2013. “Azam - dairy products.” Bakresha Group Ltd, accessed 25th June. http://bakhresa.com/services/food-beverages/bakhresa-food-products-ltd/azam-dairy/.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. 2009. The social order of markets. Theory and Society 38 (3):245–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begovic, F., and S. Baldini. 2016. Networking for better value chain inclusion: Reflections on Oxfam’s work in the raspberry value chain in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Oxford, UK: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. 2012. “Study: Children who grow up on family farms and drink raw milk have fewer allergies, autoimmune disorders.” Natural News, accessed 21st June. http://www.naturalnews.com/035802_raw_milk_farms_allergies.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brasch, S. 2014. Raw Milk Vending Machines Take Over Europe. Modern Farmer. http://modernfarmer.com/2014/03/americans-envy-europes-raw-milk-vending-machines/
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2008. Social research methods. Third ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Care. 2015. “Sustainable dairy value chains.” 23rd February. http://www.care.org/work/world-hunger/sustainable-dairy-value-chains.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Undated. “Food safety and raw milk.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accessed 21st June. http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-index.html.
   Google Scholar
• CFS. 2016. Connecting smallholders to markets - recommendations - CFS 2016/43/5. Rome, Italy: UN Committee on World Food Security.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, I. 2004. Follow the thing: Papaya. Antipode 36 (4):642–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00441.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, I. 2006. Geographies of food: Following. Progress in Human Geography 30 (5):655–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. 2014. Final report: The transformative potential of the right to food. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations, Human Rights Council.
   Google Scholar
• der Ploeg, V., and J. Douwe. 2015. Newly emerging, nested markets: A theoretical introduction. In Rural development and the construction of new markets, edited by P. Hebinck, J. D. van der Ploeg, and S. Schneider, 16–40. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• der Ploeg, V., J. Douwe, Y. Jingzhong, and S. Schneider. 2012. Rural development through the construction of new, nested, markets: Comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union. Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (1):133–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoB Equity. 2018. “Our approach.” DoB Equity, accessed 23rd February. http://www.dobequity.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, C. S., and M. Tewari. 2001. From what we wear to what we eat upgrading in global value chains. IDS Bulletin 32 (3):94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 1998. Undated. Milk Testing and quality control. In Milk processing guide series Volume 2, Naivasha, Kenya: FAO/TCP/KEN/6611 Project.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, T., and E. Mattheisen. 2016. Territorial food systems: Protecting the rural and localizing human rights accountability. Right Food Nutr. Watch 4: 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, C., G. Lieblein, S. Gliessman, T. A. Breland, N. Creamer, R. Harwood, L. Salomonsson, J. Helenius, D. Rickerl, and R. Salvador. 2003. Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22 (3):99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and R. Kaplinsky. 2001. Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. IDS Bulletin 32 (3):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12 (1):78–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2018. Defining Agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42:6. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1432329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3):481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, K. 2015. The object, methods and principles of a human economy approach. In Economy for and against democracy, edited by K. Hart, 1–15. New York and Oxford: Berghan.
   Google Scholar
• Hebinck, P., S. Schneider, and J. D. van der Ploeg. 2015. The construction of new, nested markets and the role of rural development policies: Some introductory notes. In Rural development and the Construction of New Markets, edited by P. Hebinck, J. D. van der Ploeg, and S. Schneider, 1–15. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hebinck, P., N. Mango, and H. Kimanthi. 2016. Local maize practices and the cultures of seed in Luoland, West Kenya. In Cultural sustainability and regional development: Theories and practices of territorialisation, edited by J. Dessein, E. Battaglini, and L. Horlings, 206–18. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J., and L. M. Young. 2000. Closer vertical co-ordination in agri-food supply chains: A conceptual framework and some preliminary evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5 (3):133–43. doi:10.1108/13598540010338884.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E., and M. A. Altieri. 2013. Agroecology, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1):90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J., and L. Navas‐Alemán. 2010. Value chains, donor interventions and poverty reduction: A review of donor practice. In IDS Research Reports, 63:1–106. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinsky, R., and M. Morris. 2001. A handbook for value chain research, Vol. 113. IDRC Ottawa: Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Kasumuni, L. 2015. Milk production ‘too low’. The Citizen. http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/Business/Milk-production--too-low-/1840414-2743910-4nrn89z/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kay, S. 2016. Connecting smallholders to markets: An analytical guide. International Civil Society Mechanism, Hands On the Land Alliance for Food Sovereignty. Terra Nuova: Rome, Italy
   Google Scholar
• Kimanthi, H., and P. Hebinck. 2018. ‘Castle in the sky’: The anomaly of the millennium villages project fixing food and markets in Sauri, western Kenya. Journal of Rural Studies 57:157–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivaria, F. M., J. P. T. M. Noordhuizen, and A. M. Kapaga. 2006. Prospects and constraints of smallholder dairy husbandry in the Dar es Salaam region, Tanzania. Outlook on AGRICULTURE 35 (3):209–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurwijila, L. R. 2006. Hygienic milk handling, processing and marketing: Reference guide for training and certification of small-scale milk traders in Eastern Africa. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Kurwijila, L. R., A. Omore, and D. Grace. 2012. The Tanzania dairy industry. Morogoro, Tanzania: Sokoine University of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Kusiluka, M. A., L. M. Badi, and S. S. Lunyelele. 2015. Determinants of consumption of fluid milk products in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. European Journal of Business and Management 7 (31):89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford [etc.]: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, N. 2001. Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoeney, J., and G. Goertz. 2006. A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis 14 (3):227–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martucci, R. 2015. “Integrating small farmers in liberal economy. The case of Tanga Fresh in Tanzania. .” MSc, International Development Studies. Graduate School of Social Science, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Match Maker Associates. 2014. Value Chain Development Course. Tanzania: Arusha.
   Google Scholar
• McKeon, N. 2014. Food security governance: Empowering communities, regulating corporations. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meixell, M. J., and V. B. Gargeya. 2005. Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 41 (6):531–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milkcom. 2016. “A few words about us.” Milkcom, accessed 25th June. http://www.milkcomtz.com/index.php/about-our-company.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development. 2010. Livestock sector development strategy. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Government of the United Republic of Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Livestock Development. 2006. National livestock policy. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Government of the United Republic of Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• Minten, B., L. Randrianarison, and J. F. M. Swinnen. 2009. Global retail chains and poor farmers: Evidence from Madagascar. World Development 37 (11):1728–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msalya, G. 2014. “Safe food, fair food, Tanzania: Rapid assessment report 2014.” Safe Food, Fair Food annual project planning meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 15-17 April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. 2012. Volume III: Livestock sector national report. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Government of the United Republic of Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. 2013. 2012 population and housing census. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Njombe, A. P., Y. Msanga, N. Mbwambo, and N. Makembe. 2011. The Tanzania dairy industry: Status, opportunities and prospects. edited by ministry of livestock and fisheries development. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/FAO/UNCDF. 2016. Adopting a territorial approach to food security and nutrition policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, S. P., K. J. Boor, S. C. Murphy, and S. E. Murinda. 2009. Food safety hazards associated with consumption of raw milk. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 6 (7):793–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quisumbing, A., S. Roy, J. Njuki, K. Tanvin, and E. Waithanji (2013). Can dairy value chain projects change gender norms in rural Bangladesh? Impacts on assets, gender norms, and time use. Discussion paper no. 1311. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Renting, H., T. K. Marsden, and J. Banks. 2003. Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35 (3):393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesel, K., and D. Grace. 2014. Food safety and informal markets:. Animal products in sub-Saharan Africa. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sabea, H. 2008. Mastering the landscape? Sisal plantations, land, and labor in Tanga Region, 1893-1980s. International Journal of African Historical Studies 41 (3):411–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S., J. D. van der Ploeg, and P. Hebinck. 2015. Reconsidering the contribution of nested markets to rural development. In Rural development and the construction of new markets, edited by P. Hebinck, J. D. van der Ploeg, and S. Schneider, 190–205. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 2009. The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sentenac, H. 2014. “Raw milk movement grows amid push to ease regulation.” Fox News, accessed 26th June. http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/05/01/raw-milk-movement-grows-amid-push-to-ease-regulation/.
   Google Scholar
• Seville, D., A. Buxton, and B. Vorley. 2011. “Under what conditions are value chains effective tools for pro-poor development.” Accessed 21st August], available from http://pubs. iied. org/16029IIED. html.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgeon, T. 2008. From commodity chains to value chains: interdisciplinary theory building in an age of globalization. In Jennifer Bair (ed.) Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumberg, J. 1997. Policy, milk and the Dar es Salaam peri-urban zone: A new future for an old development theme? Land Use Policy 14 (4):277–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumberg, J. 1999. The Dar es Salaam milk system: Dynamics of change and sustainability. Habitat International 23 (2):189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swai, E. S. F., N. Minja, and L. Zylstra. 1993. “Dairy development programme in Tanga, Tanzania.” Future of Livestock Industries in East and Southern Africa., Kadoma Ranch Hotel, Zimbabwe.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2007. Rethinking the global production of uneven development. Globalizations 4 (4):529–42.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D. 2008. The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorthuizen, E. G. 1970. A grazing potential in the tanga region of Tanzania. Journal of Range Management 23 (5):325–30.
   Google Scholar
• Waser, M., K. B. Michels, C. Bieli, H. Flöistrup, G. Pershagen, E. Von Mutius, M. Ege, J. Riedler, D. Schram‐Bijkerk, and B. Brunekreef. 2007. Inverse association of farm milk consumption with asthma and allergy in rural and suburban populations across Europe. Clinical & Experimental Allergy 37 (5):661–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, M. C. A. 2014. Exploring sustainable urban food provisioning: The case of Eggs in Dar es Salaam. Sustainability 6:3747–79. doi:10.3390/su6063747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, M. C. A. 2017. Feeding Dar es Salaam: A symbiotic food system perspective. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, M. C. A., and J. S. C. Wiskerke. 2017. Exploring the staple foodscape of Dar es Salaam. Sustainability 9 (6):1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, M. C. A., and P. Hebinck. 2016. The symbiotic food system: An ‘Alternative’Agri-food system already working at scale. Agriculture 6 (3):40. doi:10.3390/agriculture6030040.
   Google Scholar
• Wiskerke, J. S. C. 2010. On places lost and places regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies 37–41. doi:10.1080/13563471003642803.
   Google Scholar
• Wiskerke, J. S. C., and A. Viljeon. 2012. Sustainable urban food provisioning: Challenges for scientists, policy makers, planners and designers. In Sustainable food planning: Evolving theory and practice, edited by A. Viljoen, and J. S. C. Wiskerke, 19–35. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zylstra, L., C. Lyimo, and I. Rutamu. 1995. “Milk production and marketing in Tanga Region: Efficiency of farmer co-operatives versus private sector.” Strategies for market orientation of small scale milk producers and their organisations., Morogoro Hotel.
   Google Scholar