Evolving local agrifood initiatives within a territorial agrifood system: the case of Prato Province, Italy

References

• Anselmi, S., and R. Vignola. 2021. Participatory certifications for the sustainability transition of food systems in Costa Rica: Barriers and opportunities for scaling out. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1989106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcuri, S., B. Minotti, and F. Galli. 2022. Food policy integration in small cities: The case of intermunicipal governance in Lucca, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies 89:287–97. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argüelles, L., I. Anguelovski, and F. Sekulova. 2018. How to survive: Artificial quality food schemes and new forms of rule for farmers in direct marketing strategies. Journal of Rural Studies 62:10–20. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baù, M., F. Chricico, D. Pittino, M. Backman, and J. Klaesson. 2019. Roots to grow: Family firms and local embeddedness in rural and urban contexts. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 43 (2):360–85. doi:10.1177/1042258718796089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blay-Palmer, A., G. Santini, M. Dubbeling, H. Renting, M. Taguchi, and T. Giordano. 2018. Validating the city region food system approach: Enacting inclusive, transformational city region food systems. Sustainability 10 (5):1680–703. doi:10.3390/su10051680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousbaine, A., C. Akkary, and C. R. Bryant. 2017. What can agricultural land use planning contribute to food production and food policy? International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology 2 (1):13–20. doi:10.15406/ijawb.2017.02.00009.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkley, C. 2017. Visualizing social and geographical embeddedness of local food. Journal of Rural Studies 54:314–25. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calori, A., E. Dansero, G. Pettenati, and A. Toldo. 2019. Urban food planning in Italian cities: A comparative analysis of the cases of Milan and Turin. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 41 (8):1026–46. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1340918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., S. Martinát, and R. Cowell. 2019. Community tensions, participation, and local development: Factors affecting the spatial embeddedness of anaerobic digestion in Poland and the Czech Republic. Energy and Social Research 55:134–45. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, N., M. Stuhlmacher, A. Miles, N. Uludere Aragon, M. Wagner, M. Georgescu, P. Gong, and P. Gong. 2018. A global geospatial ecosystem services estimate of urban agriculture. Earth’s Future 6 (1):40–60. doi:10.1002/2017EF000536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dansero, E., D. Marino, G. Mazzocchi, and A. Nicolarea, eds. 2019. Lo spazio delle politiche locali del cibo: Temi, Esperienze e Prospettive. Torino: Celid.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, C. 2020. Local food policies–their constraints and drivers: Insights from Portuguese urban agriculture initiatives. Moravian Geographical Reports 28 (3):223–35. doi:10.2478/mgr-2020-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Molina, M. G., and D. Lopez-Garcia. 2021. Principles for designing Agroecology-based local (territorial) Agri-food systems: A critical revision, agroecology and sustainable food systems. doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1913690.
   Google Scholar
• De Molina, M., P. F. Petersen, F. Garrido Peña, and F. R. Caporal. 2020. Political agroecology: Advancing the transition to sustainable food systems. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Economic Social Committee (EESC), (2004). Opinion on agriculture in Periurban Areas, NAT/204, Brussels. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/agriculture-peri-urban-areas. [Accessed 3th September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat (2012). Agricultural Census in Italy. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/20078.pdf . [Accessed 3rd September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D. ed. 2009. Pianificare tra città e campagna. Scenari, attori e progetti di nuova ruralità per il territorio di Prato, 302. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D. 2018. The urban bioregion as a form and project of the co-evolution between urban and rural domain. the case of the Florence metropolitan area. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7 (1.4):61–68. doi:10.14419/ijet.v7i1.4.9264.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D. 2019. Agricultural park in Europe as a tool for agriurban policies and design: A critical overview. In Agrourbanism. Tools for governance and planning of agrarian landscape, ed. E. Gottero, 149–70. Cham (Switzerland): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D., and G. Belletti. 2017. Per una nuova co-evoluzione fra città e territorio nello sviluppo locale. La costruzione di sistemi agro-alimentari locali. In Atti della XX Conferenza Nazionale SIU - Società Italiana degli Urbanisti URBANISTICA E/È AZIONE PUBBLICA, 1910–1915. Roma-Milano: Planum Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D., G. Belletti, and M. Mancino. 2022. La Pianificazione del Territorio agricolo periurbano. Le sfide per un recupero co-evolutivo urbano/rurale per un governo integrato. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali LII:132. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D., B. Duží, and M. Mancino. 2019. Pratiche agro-urbane di prossimità per la costruzione del sistema agro-alimentare locale nel contesto di territorio di Prato: Una nuova domanda di innovazione delle politiche. In eds. E. Dansero, D. Marino, and A. Calori, 11–29. Roma: Rete Politiche Locali di Cibo.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D., B. Duží, M. Mancino, and M. Rovai. 2022. Multiple evaluation of urban and peri-urban agriculture and its relation to spatial planning: The case of Prato territory (Italy), Sustainable Cities and Society. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103636.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, D., and M. Rovai. 2022. The role of sense of place in the recovery of local food systems in bioregional contexts. Challenges and opportunities. In Preserving and constructing place attachment in Europe, forthcoming, ed. O. R. Ilovan and I. Markuszewska, 201–17. Cham (CH): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2007. Profitability and sustainability of urban and peri-urban agriculture. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Finance. FAO, Rome 95.
   Google Scholar
• Feagan, R. 2007. The place of food: Mapping out the ‘local’ in local food systems. Geography 3:23–42. doi:10.1177/0309132507073527.
   Google Scholar
• Filippini, R., S. Lardon, E. Bonari, and E. Marraccini. Unraveling the contribution of periurban farming systems to urban food security in developed countries. Agron. Sustain. Dev 382:201821doi: 10.1007/s13593-018-0499-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini, R., E. Marraccini, M. Houdart, E. Bonari, and S. Lardon. 2016. Food production for the city: Hybridization of farmers’ strategies between alternative and conventional food chain. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40 (10):1058–84. doi:10.1080/21683565.2016.1223258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonte, M. 2013. Food consumption as social practice: Solidarity purchasing groups in Rome, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies 32:230–39. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonte, M., and I. Cucco. 2015. The political economy of alternative agriculture in Italy. In Handbook of the international political economy of agriculture and food (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing), ed. A. Bonanno and L. Busch, 264–94. doi:10.4337/9781782548263.00022.
   Google Scholar
• Fonte, M., and I. Cucco. 2017. Cooperatives and alternative food networks in Italy. The long road towards a social economy in agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 53:291–302. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., and T. Marsden. 2015. (Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making. Local Environment 20 (8):940–56. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.879852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, F., P. Prosperi, E. Favilli, S. D’Amico, F. Bartolini, and G. Brunori. 2020. How can policy processes remove barriers to sustainable food systems in Europe? Contributing to a policy framework for agri-food transitions. Food Policy 26. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101871.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2016. Transforming food systems with agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40 (3):187–89. doi:10.1080/21683565.2015.1130765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnatiuk, O., K. Mezentsev, and N. Provotar. 2021. From the agricultural station to a luxury village? Changing and ambiguous everyday practices in the suburb of Vinnytsia (Ukraine). Moravian Geographical Reports 29 (3):202–16. doi:10.2478/mgr-2021-0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasseni, C. 2022. Rethinking foodscapes. Does it matter how food reaches my plate? In Making food in local and global contexts, ed. A. Nobayashi, 89–99. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-1048-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, P., and F. Forno. 2012. Political consumerism and new forms of political participation the gruppi di acquisto solidale in Italy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644 (1):121–33. doi:10.1177/0002716212454839.
   Google Scholar
• Gullino, P., L. Battisti, and F. Larcher. 2018. Linking multifunctionality and sustainability for valuing Peri-Urban farming: A case study in the turin metropolitan area (Italy). Sustainability 10 (5):1625. doi:10.3390/su10051625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinrichs, C. C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural markets. Journal of Rural Studies 16 (3):295–303. doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00063-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inwood, S., and J. Sharp. 2012. Farm persistence and adaptation at the rural–urban interface: Succession and farm adjustment. Journal of Rural Studies 28 (1):107–17. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISTAT (2022). 7th General census of agriculture: Integration of the first results. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/273753
   Google Scholar
• Kneafsey, M., L. Venn, U. Schmutz, B. Balázs, L. Trenchard, T. Eyden-Wood, E. Bos, G. Sutton, and M. Blackett. 2013. Short food supply chains and local food systems in the EU. A state of play of their socio-economic characteristics. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. https://ec.europa.eu/JRC/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/short-food-supply-chains-and-local-food-systems-eu-state-play-their-socio-economic Accessed 01 february 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lamine, C., L. Garcon, and G. Brunori. 2019. Territorial agrifood systems: A Franco-Italian contribution to the debates over alternative food networks in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 68:159–70. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizzi, R., and M. S. Righettini. 2018. Food Policy in Italy. Reference module in food science. Elsevier 1–9. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21468-6.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, D., and G. Mazzocchi. 2020. Rome, a policy without politics: The participatory process for a metropolitan scale food policy. Int. Journal of Environment Research & Public Health 17 (2):479. doi:10.3390/ijerph17020479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, L., R. Matacena, and J. Beacham. 2018. Varieties of alterity:Alternative food networks in the UK,Italy and China. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale 115 (1):27–41. doi:10.3280/SUR2018-115-S1003.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, M., M. Bednarek-Szczepańska, J. Bański, and D. Mazurek. 2021. Measuring environmental and landscape-related potential for tourism development in rural areas and assessment of its co-occurrence with tourist movement: The case of Poland. Moravian Geographical Reports 29 (2):101–12. doi:10.2478/mgr-2021-0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreevy, S. R., C. D. Rupprecht, D. Niles, A. Wiek, M. Carolan, G. Kallis, … M. Tachikawa. 2022. Sustainable agrifood systems for a post-growth world. Nature Sustainability 1–7. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00933-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mougeot, L. J. 2000. Urban agriculture: definition, presence, potentials and risks, and policy challenges, cities feeding Peoples series. Report 31, 58. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Mougeot, L. J. 2005. Agropolis. The social, political and environmental nature of urban agriculture, 308. New York: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mundler, P., and S. Laughrea. 2016. The contributions of short food supply chains to territorial development: A study of three Quebec territories. Journal of Rural Studies 45:218–29. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderifar, M., H. Hamideh Goli, and F. Ghaljaie. 2017. Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides Dev Med Educ 3:e67670. doi:10.5812/sdme.67670.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr, J., A. Ratta, and J. Smit. 1996. Urban agriculture. Food, jobs and sustainable cities, UNDP. United nations publication series for Habitat II, Vol. 1, 302. New York: UNDP Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa, C. Y., A. Matarán, R. M. Olmo, J. M. López, and R. Fuentes-Guerra. 2019. The potential role of short food supply chains in strengthening periurban agriculture in Spain: The cases of Madrid and Barcelona. Sustainability 11 (7):2080. doi:10.3390/su11072080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opitz, N., R. Berges, A. Piorr, and T. Krikser. 2016. Contributing to food security in urban areas: Differences between urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture in the Global North. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2):341–58. doi:10.1007/s10460-015-9610-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, P.-U. 2012. Improving environmental conditions in Suburban areas, interreg programme IVc 2007-2013. https://www.europarc.org/library/current-projects/periurban-parks-project/ Accessed 5 November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Pasqual, S. (eds.) (2012). La Toscana al 6° Censimento Generale dell’Agricoltura: Risultati definitivi. http://www.regione.toscana.it/censimentoagricoltura2010. (Accessed 1 October 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, C. 2013. Regulation of farmland conversion on the urban fringe: From Land-Use planning to food strategies. Insight into two case studies in provence and tuscany. International Planning Studies 18 (1):21. doi:10.1080/13563475.2013.750943.
   Google Scholar
• Piorr, A., I. Zasada, A. Doernberg, F. Zoll, and W. Ramme (2018). Research for AGRI Committee – Urban and Peri-urban agriculture in the EU. European parliament, policy department for structural and cohesion policies, Brussels, 89 pp. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/617468/IPOL_STU(2018)617468_EN.pdf [Accessed 1 December 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 2001. The Great Transformation. The political and economic origins of our time. ( 1944). New York: Farrar & Rinehart. first, Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poli, D. 2017. Food revolution and agro-urban public space in the European bioregional city. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 41 (8):965–87. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1331178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pölling, B., M. R. Prados, B. M. Torquati, G. Giacchè, X. Recansens, C. Paffarini, O. Alfranca, and W. Lorenberg. 2017. Business models in urban farming: A comparative analysis of case studies from Spain, Italy and Germany. Moravian Geographical Reports 25 (3):166–80. doi:10.1515/mgr-2017-0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regione Toscana (20112019). Dati statistici Agricoltura. 6° Censimento dell´Agricoltura. https://www.regione.toscana.it/statistiche/dati-statistici/agricoltura. [Accessed 1 December 20112019]
   Google Scholar
• Rete Italiana Politiche Locali di Cibo. Online. https://www.politichelocalicibo.it/. [Accessed 1 December 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, G., G. Belletti, M. Biancalani, G. V. Lombardi, and G. Stefani. 2019. The valorisation of wheat production through locally-based bread chains: Experiences from Tuscany. Journal of Rural Studies 71:23–35. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salone, C., and F. Governa. 2005. Italy and European spatial policies: polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices. European Planning Studies 13 (2):265–83. doi:10.1080/0965431042000321820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz Sanz, E., C. Napoléone, and B. Hubert. 2016. Peri-urban farmland characterisation. A methodological proposal for urban planning. In Sustainable urban agriculture and food planning, ed. R. R. in, 73–91. London-New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Rojo, M., A. Z. Moratalla, N. M. Alonso, and V. Hernandez Jimenez. 2014. Pathways towards the integration of periurban agrarian ecosystems into the spatial planning system. Ecological Processes 3 (1):1–16. doi:10.1186/s13717-014-0013-x.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Rojo, M., X. Recasens, C. Callau, B. Duží, S. Eiter, V. Hernandez-Jimenez, R. Laviscio, F. Lohrberg, D. Pickard, L. Scazzosi, et al. 2016. From urban food gardening to urban farming. In Eds. F. Lohrberg, L. Scazzosi, L. Lička, and A. Timpe, 24–31. Jovis Berlin: Urban Agriculture Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnino, R. 2007. Embeddedness in action: Saffron and the making of the local in southern Tuscany. Agriculture and Human Values 24 (1):61–74. doi:10.1007/s10460-006-9036-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnino, R., L. S. Tegoni, and A. De Cunto. 2019. The challenge of systemic food change: Insights from cities. Cities 85:110–16. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornaghi, C., and M. Dehaene. 2020. The prefigurative power of urban political agroecology: Rethinking the urbanisms of agroecological transitions for foodsystem transformation. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44 (5):594–610. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1680593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornaghi, C., and M. Dehaene, Eds. 2021. Resourcing an agroecological urbanism. Political, transformational and territorial dimension. Milton Park Abingdon Oxon (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vaarst, M., A. Getz Escudero, M. J. Chappell, C. Brinkley, R. Nijbroek, N. A. M. Arraes, L. Andreasen, A. Gattinger, G. F. De Almeida, D. Bossio, et al. 2018. Exploring the concept of agroecological food systems in a city-region context. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 42 (6):686–711. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1365321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanni, F. 2014. Agriculture and public goods the role of collective action. Dordrecht: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Wästfel, A., and Q. Zhang. 2018. Keeping agriculture alive next to the city - The function of the land tenure regime nearby Gothenburg, Sweden. Land Use Policy 78:447–59. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zasada, A. 2011. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture-A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28 (4):639–48. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zazo Moratalla, A., and P. Valerià. 2022. What is an agricultural park? Observations from the Spanish experience. Land Use Policy 112. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar