Transformative change of paddy rice systems for biodiversity: A case study of the crested ibis certified rice system in Sado Island, Japan

References

• Akiyama, N. 2007. Supports for sustainable agriculture by measures to conserve and improve land, water and environment. Journal of the Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering 75 (8):703–6,a1. doi:10.11408/JJSIDRE2007.75.703.
   Google Scholar
• CBD. (2021). First order draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Note by the Co-Chairs. Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/abb5/591f/2e46096d3f0330b08ce87a45/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. A., D. R. Boyd, R. K. Gould, J. Jetzkowitz, J. Liu, B. Muraca, R. Naidoo, P. Olmsted, T. Satterfield, O. Selomane, etal. 2020. Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People and Nature 00:1–25. doi:10.1002/pan3.10124.
   Google Scholar
• Crandall, S. G., J. L. Ohayon, L. A. de Wit, J. E. Hammond, K. L. Melanson, M. M. Moritsch, R. Davenport, D. Ruiz, B. Keitt, N. D. Holmes, et al. 2018. Best practices: Social research methods to inform biological conservation. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25 (1):6–23. doi:10.1080/14486563.2017.1420499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, C. Z. 2007. Research on the crested ibis. Tokyo: Shinjusha.
   Google Scholar
• Douthwaite, B., and J. A. Ashby. 2005. Innovation histories: A method from learning from experience. ILAC Brief 5:1–4. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/70176.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, N., and S. Alexander. 2017. Agriculture and biodiversity: A review. Biodiversity 18 (2–3):45–49. doi:10.1080/14888386.2017.1351892.
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., M. Barbier, M. Cerf, and J. Grin. 2012. Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, ed. I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, and B. Dedieu, 431–55. Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_19.
   Google Scholar
• García-Martín, M., L. Huntsinger, M. J. Ibarrola-Rivas, M. Penker, U. D’ambrosio, T. Dimopoulos, M. E. Fernández-Giménez, T. Kizos, J. Muñoz-Rojas, O. Saito, et al. 2022. Landscape products for sustainable agricultural landscapes. Nature Food 3: 10 3 (10):814–21. doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00612-w.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (8–9):1257–74. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2005. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (6):681–96. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2019. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39:187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, T. 2007. Environmental considerations strengthen agriculture: Why agri-environmental Policies?. Tokyo: Waseda University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. 2021. Sustainability in agri-food systems: Transformative trajectories toward the post-anthropocene. Sustainability Science 2021 16: 3 16 (3):717–19. doi:10.1007/S11625-021-00947-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10 (2):175–98. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishi, Y. 2008. The trial of agri-environmental payment by Fukuoka prefectural government. Agricultural Research 21:95–131. http://www.nohken.or.jp/21kishi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kishioka, T., S. Hashimoto, M. Nishi, O. Saito, and R. Kohsaka. 2017. Fostering cooperation between farmers and public and private actors to expand environmentally friendly rice cultivation: Intermediary functions and farmers’ perspectives. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 15 (5):593–612. doi:10.1080/14735903.2017.1374321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., and N. Aarts. 2013. The interaction of multiple champions in orchestrating innovation networks: Conflicts and complementarities. Technovation 33 (6–7):193–210. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., N. Aarts, and C. Leeuwis. 2010. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems 103 (6):390–400. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., B. van Mierlo, and C. Leeuwis. 2012. Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, ed. I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, and B. Dedieu, 457–83. Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_20.
   Google Scholar
• Komachi, R. (2017). Crested ibis habitat restoration and adaptive management centered on a rice certification system [ Doctoral thesis]. Niigata University.
   Google Scholar
• Kremen, C., and A. M. Merenlender. 2018. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362 (6412). doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.AAU6020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventon, J., D. J. Abson, and D. J. Lang. 2021. Leverage points for sustainability transformations: Nine guiding questions for sustainability science and practice. Sustainability Science 16 (3):721–26. doi:10.1007/S11625-021-00961-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., H. Tian, and D. Li. 2009. Why the crested ibis declined in the middle twentieth century. Biodiversity and Conservation 18 (8):2165–72. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9580-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOE. 2009. Basic approach to the reintroduction of threatened wild animal and plant species. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan.https://www.env.go.jp/press/press.php?serial=13648.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2019). Addendum: Red list 2019 of ministry of the environment, government of Japan. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan; 環境省. https://www.env.go.jp/press/files/jp/110616.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2021). Draft of the 2025 Roadmap for Crested Ibis Reintroduction. Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/council/12nature/y121-44b/13_mat2-8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nagai, S. (2021). Report on the ten-yaer-long efforts in the coop-deli federation’s “Sado crested ibis support rice project.” Symposium of the Ten-Year Project for Recovering Biodiversity in Rice Paddies: “Mainstreaming Biodiverse Agriculture!,” 12. https://tambo10.org/archives/1147
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima, M. 1974. The future of agrochemicals. KAGAKU TO SEIBUTSU 12 (10):690–94. doi:10.1271/kagakutoseibutsu1962.12.690.
   Google Scholar
• Namae, Y. 1994. Advancement of paddy herbicide formulation and extension of 1-kg granule. Journal of Weed Science and Technology 39 (4):275–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.3719/weed.39.275.
   Google Scholar
• Niigata Prefectural Government. (2020). Number of agriculture and forestry enterprizes. Final Results of a Survey on Agriculture and Forestry Enterprizes, Agriculture and Forestry Census of Niigata Prefecture 2020. https://www.pref.niigata.lg.jp/sec/tokei/2020noucenkakutei.html
   Google Scholar
• Nishikawa, U. 2015. Effectiveness of wildlife-friendly farming on Sado Island, a globally-important agricultural heritage system site in Japan. Japanese Journal of Ecology 65 (3):269–77. doi:10.18960/SEITAI.65.3_269.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura, I. 2012. The process of subjectivity forming of practitioners of the white stork friendly farming method: Trial of the visualization by the life story approach. Department Bulletin of the Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University 6 (1). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24546/81004267.
   Google Scholar
• Otake, N. 2010. Problem of paddy field rice cropping by the release of toki in Sado-city. Studies on Environmental Symbiosis 3:78–88. https://dokkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_detail&item_id=1625&item_no=1&page_id=13&block_id=17.
   Google Scholar
• Sado, J. A. November, 2017. Trends and efforts in Sado rice marketing. JA Sado 292 (11):16. https://www.ja-sado-niigata.or.jp/php/index-organ-past/pkobo_news/upload/7-10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sado City Government. (2012). Sado Biodiversity Strategy. 佐渡市. https://www.city.sado.niigata.jp/site/plan/2562.html
   Google Scholar
• Salomaa, A., and S. Juhola. 2020. How to assess sustainability transformations: A review. Global Sustainability 3 (e24):1–12. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.17.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, K., W. Godek, L. Klerkx, and P. M. Poortvliet. 2020. Nicaragua’s agroecological transition: Transformation or reconfiguration of the agri-food regime? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44 (5):611–28. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1667939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sdíaz, J. S., E. S. Brondízio, H. T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnár, D. Obura C. N. Zayas, ed. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/spm_unedited_advance_for_posting_htn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34 (10):1491–510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman, D. J., J. Ekboir, and K. Davis. 2009. The art and science of innovation systems inquiry: Applications to Sub-Saharan African agriculture. Technology in Society 31 (4):399–405. doi:10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2009.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• Uenishi, Y. 2019. Factors that encourage farmers to adopt farming methods to conserve the Japanese crested ibis. Agricultural Information Research 28 (3):127–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.3173/air.28.127.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, R. 2012. For community development of Sado Island in coexistence of human and ibises. Reintroduction 2:17–19. http://150.12.212.3/downloads/journal/02_04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yagi, H. 2018. Experiential knowledge, location and individual farm effect on premium rice production: On technological choices related to uonuma koshihikari in a mountainous area. Journal of the Farm Management Society of Japan 56 (2):1–11. doi:10.11300/FMSJ.56.2_1.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T. 2009. Rehabilitating locally extinct species and its validity. In Protecting threatened birds in Japan, ed. T. Yamagishi, 3–19. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., L. Klerkx, and C. Leeuwis. 2014. Functions and limitations of farmer cooperatives as innovation intermediaries: Findings from China. Agricultural Systems 127:115–25. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfagharian, M., B. Walrave, R. Raven, and A. G. L. Romme. 2019. Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy 48 (9):103788. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar