Beyond equivalency: comparing governance and sustainability of three North American organic standards

References

• Agricultural Justice Project. 2012. Social stewardship standards in organic and sustainable agriculture. Gainesville, USA: The Agricultural Justice Project.
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J. 2008. Toward a ‘just’ sustainability? Continuum 22 (6):751–56. doi:10.1080/10304310802452487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aistara, G. A. 2018. Organic sovereignties: Struggles over farming in an age of free trade. Seattle, USA: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alkon, A. H. 2013. The socio-nature of local organic food. Antipode 45 (3):663–80. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01056.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P., and M. Kovach. 2000. The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 17 (3):221–32. doi:10.1023/a:1007640506965.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, P., D. Van Dusen, J. Lundy, and S. Gliessman. 1991. Expanding the definition of sustainable agriculture. Sustainability in the Balance 3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A., and P. Rosset. 1996. Agroecology and the conversion of large‐scale conventional systems to sustainable management. International Journal of Environmental Studies 50 (3–4):165–85. doi:10.1080/00207239608711055.
   Google Scholar
• American Humane Certified. 2020. Animal welfare standards, 121. Washington, USA: American Humane.
   Google Scholar
• Arbenz, M., D. Gould, and C. Stopes. 2016. Organic 3.0—for truly sustainable farming and consumption.
   Google Scholar
• Arbenz, M., D. Gould, and C. Stopes. 2017. ORGANIC 3.0—the vision of the global organic movement and the need for scientific support. Organic Agriculture 7 (3):199–207. doi:10.1007/s13165-017-0177-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bommarco, R., D. Kleijn, and S. G. Potts. 2013. Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28 (4):230–38. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, D., C. Getz, and J. Guthman. 1997. From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis 37 (1):3–20. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., and R. Liepins. 2002. Naming organics: Understanding organic standards in New Zealand as a discursive field. Sociologia Ruralis 41 (1):22–39. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CGSB. 2020. Organic production systems: General principles and management standards (national standard of Canada CAN/CGSB-32.310-2020). Canadian General Standards Board. http://www.publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.854643/publication.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chatham House. 2021. Resourcetrade.Earth. Resource Trade. https://resourcetrade.earth/.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. 2015. Changing food politics of organic food in North America. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781784718282.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, P., R. T. Edwards, B. Hounsome, and G. Edwards-Jones. 2008. Comparative assessment of migrant farm worker health in conventional and organic horticultural systems in the United Kingdom. Science of the Total Environment 391 (1):55–65. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufeu, I., R. Le Velly, J. Bréchet, and A. Loconto. 2020. Can standards save organic farming from conventionalisation? Dynamics of collective projects and rules in a French organic producers’ organisation. Sociologia Ruralis 60 (3):621–38. doi:10.1111/soru.12298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont, A. M., and P. V. Baret. 2017. Why working conditions are a key issue of sustainability in agriculture? A comparison between agroecological, organic and conventional vegetable systems. Journal of Rural Studies 56:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle, E. J. 2011. Methodology of comparative law. Roger Williams University Law Review 16 (1):51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fouilleux, E., and A. Loconto. 2017. Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: A tripartite model of techno-politics. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9686-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. 2018. Animal welfare: Translating science into practice. In Advances in agricultural animal welfare, 129–43. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-101215-4.00007-9.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez Tovar, L., L. Martin, M. A. Gómez Cruz, and T. Mutersbaugh. 2005. Certified organic agriculture in Mexico: Market connections and certification practices in large and small producers. Journal of Rural Studies 21 (4):461–74. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2020. United States-Canada organic equivalence arrangement (USCOEA) – overview [Policy, reference material, standard]. Canadian Food Inspection Agency. https://inspection.canada.ca/organic-products/equivalence-arrangements/uscoea-overview/eng/1328068925158/1328069012553.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2021. Organic Equivalency Arrangements with Other Countries [Reference Material, standard,policy]. https://inspection.canada.ca/organic-products/equivalence-arrangements/eng/1311987562418/1311987760268
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 1998. Regulating meaning, appropriating nature: The codification of California organic agriculture. Antipode 30 (2):135–54. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 2004. The trouble with ‘organic lite’ in California: A rejoinder to the “conventionalisation” debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44 (3):301–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 2014. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California, 2nd ed. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., M. I. Sørensen, and M. L. R. Eriksen. 2018. How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior. Food Policy 74:39–52. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. L., and C. Getz. 2015. Farm size and job quality: Mixed-methods studies of hired farm work in California and Wisconsin. Agriculture and Human Values 32 (4):617–34. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9575-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. 2006. A history of organic farming: Transitions from sir Albert Howard’s war in the soil to USDA national organic Program. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21 (3):143–50. doi:10.1079/RAF2005126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. 2013. Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States. New York, USA: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, S., and C. R. Vogl. 2018. Participatory guarantee systems (PGS) in Mexico: A theoretic ideal or everyday practice? Agriculture and Human Values 35 (2):457–72. doi:10.1007/s10460-017-9844-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, S.,Fuerza Migrante, and H. Wittman. 2022. Sharing the struggle for fairness: Exploring possibilities for solidarity & just labour in organic agriculture. Canadian Food Studies/La Revue canadienne des études sur l’alimentation 9 (2):147–79. doi:10.15353/cfs-rcea.v9i2.536.
   Google Scholar
• Kremen, C., A. Iles, and C. Bacon. 2012. Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society 17 (4):44. doi:10.5751/ES-05103-170444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen, C., and A. Miles. 2012. Ecosystem services in biologically diversified versus conventional farming systems: Benefits, externalities, and trade-offs. Ecology and Society 17 (4):40. doi:10.5751/ES-05035-170440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, J. K., B. Chalit Hernandez, and A. Sawadogo. 2021. The paradoxes of purity in organic agriculture in Burkina Faso. Geoforum 127:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkoff-Zern, L. A. 2017. The case for taking account of labor in sustainable food systems in the United States. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32 (6):576–78. doi:10.1017/S1742170517000060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz, S., S. Klassen, A. Lyon. 2020. Tensions at the boundary: Rearticulating ‘organic’ plant breeding in the age of gene editing. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 8 (34):21. doi:10.1525/elementa.429.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., L. G. Tovar, E. Gueguen, S. Humphries, K. Landman, and R. S. Rindermann. 2016. Participatory guarantee systems and the re-imagining of Mexico’s organic sector. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2):373–88. doi:10.1007/s10460-015-9615-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., L. G. Tovar, R. S. Rindermann, and M. Á. G. Cruz. 2010. Participatory organic certification in Mexico: An alternative approach to maintaining the integrity of the organic label. Agriculture and Human Values 27 (2):227–37. doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9205-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obach, B. K. 2015. Organic struggle: The movement for sustainable agriculture in the United States. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• OFC. (2021). About Us—Organic Federation of Canada. OFC / FBC - Organic Federation of Canada/Fédération Biologique Du Canada. https://organicfederation.ca/about-us/
   Google Scholar
• Organic Trade Association. 2021. U.S. Organic Sales Soar to New High of Nearly $62 Billion in 2020, May25. https://ota.com/news/press-releases/21755
   Google Scholar
• Ponisio, L. C., L. K. M’Gonigle, K. C. Mace, J. Palomino, P. de Valpine, and C. Kremen. 2015. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282:20141396. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynolds, L. T. 2004. The globalization of organic agro-food networks. World Development 32 (5):725–43. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, D., and D. Cáceres. 2001. Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems 68 (1):21–40. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00060-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleenbecker, R., and U. Hamm. 2013. Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review. Appetite 71:420–29. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. 2020. Acuerdo de Lineamiento para la Operación Orgánica Agropecuaria. Diario oficial de la Federación. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/561614/Cortes_a_Versi_n_corrida_2013-2020_Acuerdo_de_L_neamiento_para_la_operaci_n_org_nica_agropecuaria.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seufert, V., and N. Ramankutty. 2017. Many shades of gray—the context-dependent performance of organic agriculture. Science Advances 3 (e1602638). doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seufert, V., N. Ramankutty, and T. Mayerhofer. 2017. What is this thing called organic? – how organic farming is codified in regulations. Food Policy 68:10–20. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siems, M. 2018. Comparative law. 2nd. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316856505.
   Google Scholar
• Soper, R. 2019. How wage structure and crop size negatively impact farmworker livelihoods in monocrop organic production: Interviews with strawberry harvesters in California. Agriculture and Human Values 37 (2):325–36. doi:10.1007/s10460-019-09989-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPCA. n.d. SPCA animal welfare standards. Vancouver, Canada: Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.
   Google Scholar
• Suppan, S. 2019. New NAFTA: Locking in U.S. food safety management fragmentation and failings. Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy, July 12. https://www.iatp.org/documents/new-nafta-locking-us-food-safety-management-fragmentation-and-failings
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Organic Agriculture Action Network (SOAAN). 2013. Best practice guideline for agriculture & value chains. Bonn, Germany: IFOAM - Organics International.
   Google Scholar
• Unidos Mexicanos, E. 2006. Ley de Productos Orgánicos. http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LPO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2020. eCFR — code of federal regulations, title 7, subtitle B, chapter I, subchapter M, part 205—NATIONAL ORGANIC PROGRAM. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=9874504b6f1025eb0e6b67cadf9d3b40&rgn=div6&view=text&node=7:3.1.1.9.32.7&idno=7.
   Google Scholar
• USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. n.d. International Trade with Mexico. Accessed August 26, 2022. https://www.ams.usda.gov/services/organic-certification/international-trade-mexico?utm_source=pocket_mylist
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, A. M., J. E. Dennis, and H. Wittman. 2015. Growing Good Agricultural Jobs in British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: Working Paper – Good Jobs Economy in BC Conference. http://farmland.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2014/04/Growing-Good-Agricultural-Jobs-in-British_Columbia_2015-02-25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, A. M., G. Otero, and H. Wittman. 2016. Rock stars and bad apples: Moral economies of alternative food networks and precarious farm work regimes. Antipode 48 (4):1–23. doi:10.1111/anti.12221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer, H., and J. Lernoud, eds., 2019. The World of Organic Agriculture—statistics and emerging trends 2019. Frick, Switzerland and Bonn, Germany: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), IFOAM - Organics international.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, H., J. Trávníček, C. Meier, and B. Schlatter. 2021. The World of organic agriculture statistics and emerging trends 2021. Frick, Switzerland and Bonn, Germany: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL & IFOAM Organics International.
   Google Scholar
• Yiridoe, E. K., S. Bonti-Ankomah, and R. C. Martin. 2005. Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20 (4):193–205. doi:10.1079/RAF2005113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar