Contributions of participatory certification to the territorialization of agroecology

References

• Altieri, M. A. 2022. Propuesta Metodológica para Evaluar el Escalamiento de Iniciativas Agroecológicas. Centro Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Agroecológicas - Celia y Red de Agricultura Ecológica del Perú – Rae Perú. https://raeperu.org.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri, M. A., and C. I. Nicholls. 2012. Agroecology scaling up for food sovereignty and resiliency. In Sustainable agriculture reviews. Sustainable agriculture reviews, E. Lichtfouse. ed., Vol. 11, Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-5449-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Anselmi, S., and R. Vignola. 2022. Participatory certifications for the sustainability transition of food systems in Costa Rica: Barriers and opportunities for scaling out. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 46 (2):273–93. doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1989106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellante, L. 2017. Building the local food movement in Chiapas, Mexico: Rationales, benefits, and limitations. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (1):119–34. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9700-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, D., O. Giraldo, P. Rosset, O. Lopez-Corona, and J. Perez-Cassarino. 2023. Campesino a campesino (peasant to peasant) processes versus conventional extension: A comparative model to examine agroecological scaling. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 47 (4):520–47. doi:10.1080/21683565.2023.2164882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, N., and C. R. Vogl. 2018. Participatory guarantee systems in Peru: Two case studies in Lima and Apurímac and the role of capacity building in the food chain. Sustainability 10 (12):4644. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, T. P., S. S. Aragão, V. F. D. Souza-Esquerdo, and M. D. S. Pereira. 2022. Perfil dos agricultores orgânicos e as formas de avaliação da conformidade orgânica no estado de São Paulo. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 61:e260825.
   Google Scholar
• Brito, T. P., V. F. de Souza-Esquerdo, and R. S. Borsatto. 2022. State of the art on research about organic certification: A systematic literature review. Organic Agriculture 12 (2):177–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-022-00390-6.
   Google Scholar
• Calderón-Cisneros, A., and L. Soto-Pinto. 2014. Transformaciones agrícolas en el contexto periurbano de la ciudad de San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas. LiminaR Estudios Sociales y Humanísticos 12 (1):125–43. doi:10.29043/liminar.v12i1.329.
   Google Scholar
• Chaparro-Africano, A. M. 2019. Toward generating sustainability indicators for agroecological markets. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 43 (1):40–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaparro-Africano, A., and M. Páramo. 2022. Challenges of the Participatory guarantee system of the network of agroecological markets of bogota-region, as a strategy for certification and promotion of agroecology. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 20 (7):1307–21. doi:10.1080/14735903.2022.2106657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras-Soto, M. B., J. A. Medrano-Félix, J. R. Ibarra-Rodríguez, J. Martínez-Urtaza, Q. C. Chaidez, and N. Castro-Del Campo. 2019. The last 50 years of salmonella in Mexico: Sources of isolation and factors that influence its prevalence and diversity. Revista biociencias 6 (spe):e540. doi:10.15741/revbio.06.nesp.e540.
   Google Scholar
• Coolsaet, B. 2016. Towards an agroecology of knowledges: Recognition, cognitive justice and farmers’ autonomy in France. Journal of Rural Studies 47:165–71. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuéllar-Padilla, M., and E. Ganuza-Fernandez. 2018. We don’t want to be officially certified! Reasons and implications of the Participatory guarantee systems. Sustainability 10 (4):1142. doi:10.3390/su10041142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Data México - Gobierno de México. 2020. San Cristóbal de las Casas. https://www.economia.gob.mx/datamexico/es/profile/geo/san-cristobal-de-las-casas?redirect=true#population-and-housing.
   Google Scholar
• Domené-Painenao, O., and F. F. Herrera. 2019. Situated agroecology: Massification and reclaiming university programs in Venezuela. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8):936–53. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1617223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, S. G. 2019. El mundo de los migrantes por estilo de vida, en San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas. Cuicuilco Revista de ciencias antropológicas 26 (75):67–91. https://revistas.inah.gob.mx/index.php/cuicuilco/article/view/14717.
   Google Scholar
• Farreras, V., and P. F. Salvador. 2022. Why do some Participatory guarantee systems emerge, become effective, and are sustained over time, while others fail? An application of the Ostrom social-ecological system framework. Land Use Policy 118:106134. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, B., M. A. Maya, O. Giraldo, and Mier y M. Terán, H. Morales, and P. Rosset. 2019. Special issue editorial: What do we mean by agroecological scaling? Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7):722–23. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1630908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FIBL, I. F. O. A. M., and Organics International. 2023. The world of organic agriculture statistics and emerging trends 2023 Europe. (Org). 24: ed.[s.l.]. 358.
   Google Scholar
• Floriani, N., D. Floriani, A. de Almeida Silva, and A. M. Haliski. 2022. Territorializações agroecológicas: saberes, práticas e políticas de natureza em comunidades rurais tradicionais do Paraná. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura 30 (1):e2230103. doi:https://doi.org/10.36920/esa-v30n1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Fouilleux, E., and A. Loconto. 2017. Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: A tripartite model of techno-politics. Agric Hum Values 34 (1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9686-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, E., H. Morales, and M. Mier y Terán. 2022. Sistemas alimentarios frente a la covid-19:desafíos y esperanzas en México y Colombia MARCO GIRóN Comité de Integración Regional SALSA Bogotá Cundinamarca. Ecofronteras 26 (74):2–5. https://revistas.ecosur.mx/ecofronteras/index.php/eco/article/view/ 2029.
   Google Scholar
• García López, V., O. F. Giraldo, H. Morales, P. M. Rosset, and J. M. Duarte. 2019. Seed sovereignty and agroecological scaling: Two cases of seed recovery, conservation, and defense in Colombia. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8):827–47. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1578720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gascuel-Odoux, C., F. Lescourret, B. Dedieu, C. Detang-Dessendre, P. Faverdin, and L. Hazard, … T. Caquet. 2022. A research agenda for scaling up agroecology in European countries. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42 (3):53. doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00786-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo, O. 2022. Multitudes Agroecológicas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 242.
   Google Scholar
• Giraldo, O., and P. Rosset. 2021. Principios sociales de las agroecologías emancipadoras. Desenvolv Meio Ambiente 58:708-732. 10.5380/dma.v58i0.77785. e-ISSN 2176–9109. doi:10.5380/dma.v58i0.77785.
   Google Scholar
• Giraldo, O. F., P. Rosset, and H. Morales, y M. M. Terán, & B. Ferguson. 2021. Editorial - Territorialización de la agroecología. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 58. doi:10.5380/dma.v58i0.83638.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2016. Transforming food systems with agroecology. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 40 (3):187–89. doi:10.1080/21683565.2015.1130765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S., and B. Ferguson. 2021. An urgent call for deep food system change. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 45 (1):1–2. doi:10.1080/21683565.2020.1831731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S., and M. Rosemeyer. 2010. The conversiontosustainableagriculture: Principles, processes, andpractices, 380. CRC, Boca Raton/FL.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, A. C. 2010. Red comida sana y cercana: construyendo nuevas estrategias de comercialización y producción [ dissertation]. [San Cristóbal de las Casas (MX)]: Colégio de la Frontera Sur de México. ( ht tps://ecosur.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/bitstream/1017/1689/1/100000036710_documento.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Martínez, E. 2015. Maíz, milpa, milperos y agricultura campesina en Chiapas. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco. https://www.aacademica.org/emanuel.gomez/21.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Pérez, C., H. Morales, and F. Limón-Aguirre. 2013. Valoraciones de calidad en alimentos orgánicos y de origen local entre consumidores de la red Comida Sana y Cercana en Chiapas. LiminaR 11 (1):104–17. doi:10.29043/liminar.v11i1.25.
   Google Scholar
• Haesbaert, R. 2020. Do corpo-território ao território-corpo (da terra): contribuições decoloniais. GEOgraphia 22 (48). doi:10.22409/GEOgraphia2020.v22i48.a43100.
   Google Scholar
• Hirata, A. R. 2021. Sistema Participativo de Garantia: conformação nas diferentes realidades brasileiras. 280 p. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, 2021. (https://repositorio.unicamp.br/acervo/detalhe/1162096).
   Google Scholar
• Hirata, A., L. C. Rocha, T. Assis, V. F. Souza-Esquerdo, and S. Bergamasco. 2019. The contribution of the Participatory guarantee system in the revival of agroecological principles in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Sustainability 11 (17):4675. doi:10.3390/su11174675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home, R., H. Bouagnimbeck, R. Ugas, M. Arbenz, and M. Stolze. 2017. Participatory guarantee systems: Organic certification to empower farmers and streng then communities. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 41 (5):526–45. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1279702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruschka, N., S. Kaufmann, and C. Vogl. 2021. The benefits and challenges of participating in Participatory guarantee systems (PGS) initiatives following institutional formalization in Chile. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 20 (4):393–407. doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1934364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannucci, G., and G. Sacchi. 2022. The evolution of organic market between third-party certification and Participatory guarantee systems. Bio-Based and Applied Economics 10 (3):239–51. doi:10.36253/bae-10470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INEGI. Censo Agropecuário. 2023. Resultados Oportunos del Estado de Chiapas. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/programas/cagf/2022/doc/CA2022ROCHS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía - INEGI. 2020. Chiapas. Población rural y urbana. (https://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/chis/poblacion/distribucion.aspx?tema=me&e=07).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, S., N. Hruschka, L. Vildozo, and C. Vogl. 2022. Alternative food networks in Latin America—exploring PGS (Participatory guarantee systems) markets and their consumers: A cross-country comparison. Agric Hum Values 40 (1):193–216. doi:10.1007/s10460-022-10347-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, S., and C. R. Vogl. 2018. Participatory guarantee systems (PGS) in Mexico: A theoretic ideal or everyday practice? Agric Hum Values 35 (2):457–72. doi:10.1007/s10460-017-9844-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, C. J. 2010. Case studies and ecological understanding. In The ecology of place, ed. I. Billick and M. V. Price, 283–302. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago Press. https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~krebs/papers/250.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Latin American PGS Forum. Foro Latinoamericano de Sistemas Participativos de Garantía. 2009. Carta De Princípios Antônio Prado 2:3. https://www.anpeperu.org/sites/default/files/carta_de_princpios_del_foro_latinoamericano_de_spgs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, A. M., F. Garrido-Garza, and I. Dufeu. 2023. Innovations for Sustainable food systems: Focusing on agroecology and Participatory guarantee Systems.　Journal of Rural Problems. Journal of Rural Problems 59 (1):37–44. doi:10.7310/arfe.59.37.
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, A., and M. Hatanaka. 2018. Participatory guarantee systems: Alternative ways of defining, measuring, and assessing ‘sustainability’. Sociologia Ruralis 58 (2):412–32. doi:10.1111/soru.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Cifuentes, M., C. R. Vogl, and M. Cuéllar-Padilla. 2018. Participatory guarantee systems in Spain: Motivations, achievements, challenges and opportunities for improvement based on three case studies. Sustainability 10 (11):4081. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-García, D., G. Vázquez-Macías, J. García-Fernández, M. Schmitt, P. Ortega-Faura, and J. L. Espluga-Trenc. 2023. Towards a politics of recognition: Exploring the symbolic contexts of material agroecological transitions. Sustainability 15 (13):10091. doi:10.3390/su151310091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliocca, N., E. Ellis, G. Allington, A. Bremond, J. Angelo, O. Mertz, P. Messerli, P. Meyfroidt, R. Seppelt, and P. Verburg. 2018. Closing global knowledge gaps: Producing generalized knowledge from case studies of social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 50:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrini, M. B., G. Martin, M. A. Magne, M. Duru, N. Couix, L. Hazard, and G. Plumecocq. 2019. Agroecological transition from farms to territorialised agri-food systems: Issues and drivers. Agroecological Transitions: From Theory to Practice in Local Participatory Design 69–98. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-01953-2
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, A., G. Kalt, L. Kaufmann, E. Röös, A. Muller, and R. Weisshaidinger, … K. Erb. 2022. Impacts of scaling up agroecology on the sustainability of European agriculture in 2050. EuroChoices 21 (3):27–36. doi:10.1111/1746-692X.12373.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabi, S., J. C. Perez-Mesa, and C. Giagnocavo. 2022. The role of consumer-citizens and connectedness to nature in the sustainable transition to agroecological food systems: The mediation of innovative business models and a multi-level perspective. Agriculture 12 (2):203.
   Google Scholar
• Meirelles, L. 2020. A origem da certificação participativa e o desafio dos sistemas participativos de garantia. In Sistemas Participativos de Garantia do Brasil: Histórias e Experiências, ed. A. Hirata and L. Rocha, 1th ed., https://portal.ifsuldeminas.edu.br/images/PDFs/proex/publicacoes_livros/SPG_Brasil_-_E-Book_-_HirataRocha_-_IFSULDEMINAS_1.pdf 51–64. Pouso Alegre (MG): IFSULDEMINAS.
   Google Scholar
• Mena, M., and Agustín. 2015. ¿Es posible reducir la desconfianza política en México? El caso mexicano (1996-2004). Revista mexicana de opinión pública 18:53–68. doi:10.1016/s1870-7300(15)71360-8.
   Google Scholar
• Mier y Terán, M., M. G. Gacho, O. Giraldo, M. A. Aldasoro, H. Morales, B. Ferguson, P. Rosset, A. Khadse, and C. Campos. 2018. Bringing agroecology to scale: An overview of key drivers and emblematic cases. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 42 (6):01–29. doi:10.1080/21683565.2018.1443313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, E. F. P., P. A. Niederle, B. C. de Gennaro, and L. Roselli. 2021. Agri-food markets towards agroecology: Tensions and compromises faced by small-scale farmers in Brazil and Chile. Sustainability 13 (6):3096. doi:10.3390/su13063096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muterlle, J. C., and L. A. G. Cunha. 2011. A territorialização da agroecologia no território rural do vale do ribeira, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Geográfica de América Central 2:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nath, S. K. 2022. Increasing self-esteem to attract and retain farmers in agriculture profession. Indian Journal of Extension Education 58 (2):69–72. doi:10.48165/IJEE.2022.58213.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., L. G. Tovar, E. Gueguen, S. Humphries, K. Landman, and R. S. Rindermann. 2015. Participatory guarantee systems and the re-imagining of Mexico’s organic sector. Agriculture and Human Values 33 (2):373–88. doi:10.1007/s10460-015-9615-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, P. 2020. Pathways to scaling agroecology in the city region: Scaling out, scaling up and scaling deep through community-led trade. Sustainability 12 (19):7842. doi:10.3390/su12197842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODEMCA - Observatorio de las Democracias. 2021. Geopolítica de la desconfianza organizada: autodefensas y horizontes del autogobierno en Chiapas. (https://www.chiapasparalelo.com/opinion/2021/10/geopolitica-de-la-desconfianza-organizada-autodefensas-y-horizontes-del-autogobierno-en-chiapas/#_ednref1).
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, S. B., T. P. Brito, and V. G. Pereira. 2022. Feira-livre como experiência de Bem Viver: uma expressão pulsante das resistências cotidianas. PerCursos 23 (53):180–210. doi:10.5965/1984724623532022180.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, J. 2020. Case studies towards the analysis of total social construction. Chinese Journal of Sociology 6 (3):457–93. doi:10.1177/2057150X20942969.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation 2091/1991. Official Journal of the European Communities L. 198: 22 July 1991. 1–15.https://leap.unep.org/countries/eu/national-legislation/council-regulation-eec-no-209291-organic-production-agricultural.
   Google Scholar
• Roldán-Rueda, H. N., M. A. Gracia, and M. Mier y Terán. 2018. Los mercados locales alternativos en México y Colombia: resistencias y transformaciones en torno a procesos de certificación. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural 15 (82):57–73. doi:10.11144/javeriana.cdr15-82.mlam.
   Google Scholar
• Rosina Bara, C., R. JarquinGálvez, H. Reyes Hernández, and J. Fortanelli Martinez. 2018. Adaptation of a participatory organic certification system to the organic products law in six local markets in Mexico. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 42 (1):48–76. doi:10.1080/21683565.2017.1359736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. A. Altieri. 2017. Agroecology: Science and politics. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and M. A. A. Altieri. 2018. Ciencia y Política. Sociedad Científica Latinoamericana de Agroecología SOCLA. http://celia.agroeco.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Rosset-y-Altieri-texto-completo-sin-portada-1.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P. M., and L. P. Barbosa 2019. Territorialização da Agroeocologia na Via Campesina. Boletim n .39 Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Ecologica ECOECO) (46–51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334259970_TERRITORIALIZACAO_DA_AGROECOLOGIA_NA_VIA_CAMPESINA).
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, P., and M. E. Martínez-Torres. 2016. Agroecología, territorio, recampesinización y movimientos sociales. Estudios Sociales 25 (47):275–99. (https://www.ciad.mx/estudiosociales/index.php/es/article/view/318).
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, G. 2019. Social innovation matters: The adoption of participatory guarantee systems within Italian alternative agri‐food networks. Strategic Change 28 (4):241–48. doi:10.1002/jsc.2265.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchi, G., G. Stefani, D. Romano, and G. Nocella. 2022. Consumer renaissance in Alternative agri-food networks between collective action and co-production. Sustainable Production and Consumption 29:311–27. 10.018. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saquet, M. A. 2008. Por uma abordagem territorial. In (Orgs.)Territórios e Territorialidades: teorias, processos e conflitos, ed. M. A. Saquet and E. S. Sposito. 73–94. São Paulo: Editora Expressão Popular.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla-Guzmàn, E., and G. Woodgate. 2013. Agroecología: Fundamentos del pensamiento social agrario y teoría sociológica. Agroecología 8 (2):27–34. https://revistas.um.es/agroecologia/article/view/212161.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K., and E. McCoy. 1994. Applied ecology and the logic of case studies. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):228–49. doi:10.1086/289797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simona, Z. 2022. Territorial scaling of agroecology: At the intersection of agri-food Sustainability transitions and Rural revitalization. Journal of Rural Problems 58 (1):36–43. doi:10.7310/arfe.58.36.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., and C. Grasseni. 2020. Ambivalent solidarities: Food governance reconfigurations in Croatia and Italy. Anthropology Today 36 (1):12–16. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, B. M., A. M. R. Jaime, D. R. A. Lozano, and P. M. Rosset. 2012. Revolução Agroecológica: o movimento de Camponês a Camponês da ANAP em Cuba. 1, 152. São Paulo: Outras Expressões.
   Google Scholar
• Tasca, L. H. C. 2023. Sistemas Participativos de Garantia (SPG) na equivalência de certificação orgânica entre Brasil e Chile. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) – Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas. (https://repositorio.unicamp.br/acervo/detalhe/1162096).
   Google Scholar
• Tasca, L. H. C., T. P. Brito, and V. F. Souza-Esquerdo. 2022. Os Sistemas Participativos De Garantia (Spg) Na América Latina. In Anais do 60º Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural (SOBER) Anais, Natal(RN) UFRN. https://www.even3.com.br/anais/sober2022/486446-os-sistemas-participativos-de-garantia-(spg)-na-america-latina/.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo, V. M., and N. Barrera-Bassols. 2015. A memória biocultural: a importância ecológica das sabedorias tradicionais. São Paulo: Expressão.
   Google Scholar
• Val, V., P. Rosset, C. Z. Lomelí, O. F. Giraldo, and D. Rocheleau. 2019. Agroecology and La via campesina I. The symbolic and material construction of agroecology through the dispositive of “peasant-to-peasant” processes. Agroecology & Sustainable Food Systems 43 (7–8):872–94. doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1600099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Val, V., P. M. Rosset, C. Zamora Lomelí, O. F. Giraldo, and D. Rocheleau. 2021. Agroecología y La Vía Campesina I. La construcción simbólica y material de la agroecología através de los procesos de “campesina(o) a campesina(o)”. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 58:509–30. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/dma.v58i0.81339.
   Google Scholar