Identification of soil properties associated with the peasant perception of the suitability of the land for growing organic coffee: the case of traditional agriculture in the “Mixteca Alta” mountains of Oaxaca, México

References

• Aguilar-Santelises, R., and R. F. Del Castillo. 2015. Demographic and socio-economic determinants of traditional plant knowledge among the Mixtecs of Oaxaca, Southern Mexico. Human Ecology 43 (5):655–67. doi:10.1007/s10745-015-9772-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anhar, A., Y. Abubakar, H. P. Widayat, A. M. Muslih, R. Baihaqi, and A. Baihaqi. 2021. Altitude, shading, and management intensity effect on arabica coffee yields in Aceh, Indonesia. Open Agriculture 6 (1):254–62. doi:10.1515/opag-2021-0220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, F., J. Garcia, and A. Mizrahi. 2005. Diagnóstico campesino de la situación agrícola en Hocabá, Yucatán. Terra Latinoamericana 23 (4):571–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, F., and J. A. Zinck. 2010. Construction of an Yucatec Maya soil classification and comparison with the WRB framework. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 6 (7):1–11. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-6-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedolla-Ochoa, C., F. Bautista, and Á. Gallegos. 2018. Environmental functions of smallholder farmer land classes in the zicuirán-infiernillo biosphere reserve, Mexico. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 3 (3):265–74. doi:10.5154/r.rchscfa.2017.09.058.
   Google Scholar
• Bodner, M., K. Morozova, P. Kruathongsri, P. Thakeow, and M. Scampicchio. 2019. Effect of harvesting altitude, fermentation time and roasting degree on the aroma released by coffee powder monitored by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. European Food Research & Technology 245 (7):1499–506. doi:10.1007/s00217-019-03281-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canet-Brenes, G., C. Soto-Víquez, P. Ocampo-Thomason, J. Rivera-Ramírez, A. Navarro-Hurtado, G. Guatemala-Morales, and S. Villanueva-Rodríguez. 2016. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura-Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C, 126, 1a ed. San José, Costa Rica: La situación y tendencias de la producción de café en América Latina y El Caribe.
   Google Scholar
• Carducci, C., G. de Oliveira, J. Lima, D. Rossoni, A. da Costa, and L. Oliveira. 2014. Distribuição espacial das raízes de cafeeiro e dos poros de dois Latossolos sob manejo conservacionista. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 18 (3):270–78. doi:10.1590/S1415-43662014000300005.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Rural Sustentable y la Soberanía Alimentaria (CEDRSSA). 2018. El café en México diagnóstico y perspectiva. México: CDMX.
   Google Scholar
• Cirilo, L. C., F. Moreira, G. Araújo, F. Castro, and J. Stracieri. 2013. Variabilidade espacial de atributos físicos do solo e características agronómicas da cultura do café. Coffee Science, Lavras 8:265–75.
   Google Scholar
• CONABIO. 2001. Edafología. Escalas 1:250000 y 1:1000000. Mexico, Df: Instituto Nacional de investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias - Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. http://geoportal.conabio.gob.mx/metadatos/doc/html/eda251mgw.html
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Hunt, I. J., K. L. Turner, A. Te Pareake Mead, J. Cabrera-Lopez, R. Bolton, C. J. Idrobo, I. Miretski, A. Morrison, and J. P. Robson. 2012. Biocultural design: A new conceptual framework for sustainable development in rural indigenous and local communities. Sapiens 5 (2):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. P. 1965. Pipette method of particle size analysis. In Methods of soil analysis, ed. C. A. Black, 562–563. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy.
   Google Scholar
• Defrenet, E., O. Roupsard, K. Van Den Meersche, F. Charbonnier, J. P. Pérez-Molina, E. Khac, I. Prieto, A. Stokes, C. Roumet, B. Rapidel, et al. 2016. Part of a special issue on root biology: Root biomass, turnover and net primary productivity of a coffee agroforestry system in Costa Rica: Effects of soil depth, shade trees, distance to row and coffee age. Annals of Botany 118 (4):833–51. doi:10.1093/AOB/MCW153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Rosa, D., F. Mayol, F. Moreno, F. Cabrera, E. Díaz-Pereira, and J. Antoine. 2002. A multilingual soil profile database (SDBM plus) as an essential part of land resources information systems. Environmental Modelling & Software 17 (8):721–30. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00031-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrovina, I., and F. Bautista. 2015. Analysis of the suitability of various soil groups and types of climate for avocado growing in the state of Michoacán, Mexico. Eurasian Soil Science, Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Fertility 5 (47):491–503. doi:10.1134/S1064229314010037.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2006. Guidelines for soil description. 4a ed. Rome, Italy: Management Service Information Division FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2022, November 10. Markets and Trade. Commodities- Coffee. https://www.fao.org/markets-and-trade/commodities/coffee/en/
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 1973. A framework for land evaluation. Draft edition. AGL/MISC/73/14, 65. Rome: FAO
   Google Scholar
• Faraway, J. J. 2010. Generalized Linear Models. In International encyclopedia of education, ed. P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw, 3rd, 178–83. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01331-2.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, J. S., and F. Bautista. 2012. Knowledge of the Yucatec Maya in seasonal tropical forest management: The forage plants. Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad 83 (2):503–18. doi:10.22201/ib.20078706e.2012.2.1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos, A., F. Bautista, and I. Dubrovina. 2016. Software to evaluate the environmental functions of soils. Software System 2:195–200. doi:10.15827/0236-235X.114.195-200.
   Google Scholar
• Gallegos, Á., D. López-Carmona, and F. Bautista. 2019. Quantitative assessment of environmental soil functions in volcanic zones from Mexico using S&E software. Sustainability 11 (17):4552. doi:10.3390/su11174552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Calderón, N. E., A. Ibáñez-Huerta, G. Alvarez-Arteaga, P. V. Krasilnikov, and A. Hernández-Jiménez. 2006. Soil diversity and properties in mountainous subtropical areas in Sierra Sur de Oaxaca, Mexico. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 86 (1):61–76. doi:10.4141/S04-070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getachew, M., K. Tolassa, P. De Frenne, K. Verheyen, A. Tack, K. Hylander, B. Ayalew, and P. Boeckx. 2020. The relationship between elevation, soil temperatures, soil chemical characteristics, and green coffee bean quality and biochemistry in southwest Ethiopia 42: 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00801-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-González, R., D. J. Palma-López, J. J. Obrador-Olan, and O. Ruiz-Rosado. 2018. Densidad radical y tipos de suelos en los que se produce café (Coffea arabica L.) en Chiapas, México. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios 5 (14):203–15. doi:10.19136/era.a5n14.1278.
   Google Scholar
• Hameed, A., S. A. Hussain, and H. A. R. Suleria. 2020. Coffee bean-related” agroecological factors affecting the coffee. In Co-evolution of secondary metabolites. Reference series in phytochemistry, ed., J. In: Mérillon and K. Ramawat. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96397-6_21.
   Google Scholar
• ICO. Organización Internacional del Café. 2020. Estadísticas de los países exportadores y consumidores de café. recuperado el 23 de agosto del 2022 de. https://www.ico.org/trade_statistics.asp?section=Statistics
   Google Scholar
• Inmecafé-Nestlé. 1990. El cultivo del cafeto en México. México, D: Instituto Mexicano del Café. Compañía Nestlé.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, S., C. M. Bacon, S. M. Philpott, V. Ernesto Méndez, P. Läderach, and R. A. Rice. 2014. Shade coffee: Update on a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 64 (5):416–28. doi:10.1093/biosci/biu038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juárez-López, M., N. Velázquez-Rosas, and C. López-Binnqüist. 2017. Tree diversity and uses in coffee plantations of a mixe community in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 37 (3):765–78. doi:10.2993/0278-0771-37.4.765.
   Google Scholar
• Krasilnikov, P., N. E. García-Calderón, and E. Fuentes-Romero. 2007. Pedogenesis and slope processes in subtropical mountain areas, Sierra Sur de Oaxaca, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas 24 (3):469–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasilnikov, P. V., and J. A. Tabor. 2003. Perspectives on utilitarian ethnopedology. Geoderma 111 (2–4):197–215. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00264-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läderach, P., J. Ramirez–Villegas, C. Navarro-Racines, C. Zelaya, A. Martinez–Valle, and A. Jarvis. 2017. Climate change adaptation of coffee production in space and time. Climate Change 141:47–62. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1788-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, A., and K. Stahr. 2010. The potential of soil functions and planner-oriented soil evaluation to achieve sustainable land use. Journal of Soils & Sediments 10 (6):1092–102. doi:10.1007/s11368-010-0207-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, D. S., S. A. Kowalewski, and G. Holdridge. 2013. 3400 years of agricultural engineering in mesoamerica: Lama-bordos of the Mixteca Alta, Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (11):4107–11. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Carmona, D., and F. Bautista. 2023. La integración de la cafeticultura mexicana en mercados internacionales: el caso de la Mixteca Alta. In Integración Global: El Nuevo Entorno de Los Territorios Locales, ed. A. Borrego, M. I. Ramírez and M. Astier, 137–162. Morelia, Michoacán de Ocampo: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental.
   Google Scholar
• López-Carmona, D., Á. Gallegos, D. Palma-López, G. Martín-Morales, M. Barragán-Maravilla, G. Hernández-Vallecillo, and F. Bautista. 2021. Selección de tierras para el cultivo de café en zonas con información escasa: análisis espacial del territorio y conocimiento local. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios 8 (1):e2419. doi:10.19136/era.a8n1.2419.
   Google Scholar
• López, F. J., E. Escamilla, A. Zamarripa, and G. Cruz. 2016. Producción y Calidad en variedades de café (Coffea arabica L.) En veracruz, México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 39 (3):297–304. doi:10.35196/rfm.2016.3.297-304.
   Google Scholar
• Luna-José, A. D., and B. R. Aguilar. 2012. Traditional knowledge among zapotecs of Sierra Madre del Sur, Oaxaca. Does it represent a base for plant resources management and conservation? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8 (1). doi:10.1186/1746-4269-8-24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Márquez, F. R., P. Quispe, N. Molleapaza, S. Cabrera, and J. Peña. 2020. Relación entre las características del suelo y altitud con la calidad sensorial de café cultivado bajo sistemas agroforestales en Cusco, Perú. Scientia Agropecuaria 11 (4):529–36. doi:10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.04.08.
   Google Scholar
• Melke, A., and I. F. 2015. Nutritional requirement and management of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in Ethiopia: National and global perspectives. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 5 (5):400–18. doi:10.9734/AJEA/2015/12510.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, A., and M. Venkatesan. 2020. Spatial data-based prediction models for crop yield analysis: A systematic review. In Emerging research in data engineering systems and computer communications. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, ed. P. Venkata Krishna and M. Obaidat, 341–52. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-0135-7_33/COVER.
   Google Scholar
• Motta, A. C., J. A. Nick, G. T. Yorinori, and B. M. Serrat. 2006. Distribuição horizontal e vertical da fertilidade do solo e das raízes de cafeeiro (Coffea arabica L.) cultivar Catuaí. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 28 (4):455–63. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v28i4.758.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties, ed. A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, 539–579. Wisconsin, EUA: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Nesper, M., C. Kueffer, S. Krishnan, C. Kushalappa, J. Ghazoul, and J. Firn. 2019. Simplification of shade tree diversity reduces nutrient cycling resilience in coffee agroforestry. The Journal of Applied Ecology 56 (1):119–31. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz, C., C. Gutiérrez-Castorena, A. Licona-Vargas, and P. Sánchez-Guzmán. 2005. Contemporary influence of indigenous soil (land) classification in México. Eurasian Soil Sci 38 (1):89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, C., D. Pájaro, and V. Ordaz. 1990. Manual para la cartografía de clases de tierras campesinas. Serie Cuadernos de Edafología 15. Centro de Edafología, Colegio de Postgraduados Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México, México Cuaderno de Edafologia 15:58.
   Google Scholar
• Palacio-Prieto, J. L., E. Rosado-González, X. Ramírez-Miguel, O. Oropeza-Orozco, S. Cram-Heydrich, M. A. Ortiz-Pérez, J. M. Figueroa-Mah-Eng, and G. F. de Castro-Martínez. 2016. Erosion, culture and geoheritage; the case of Santo Domingo Yanhuitlán, Oaxaca, México. Geoheritage 8 (4):359–69. doi:10.1007/s12371-016-0175-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma-López, D. J., and F. Bautista. 2019. Technology and local wisdom: The Maya soil classification app. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana 71 (2):249–60. doi:10.18268/BSGM2019v71n2a2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rodríguez, V., and K. C. Anderson. 2013. Terracing in the Mixteca Alta, Mexico: Cycles of resilience of an ancient land-use strategy. Human Ecology 41 (3):335–49. doi:10.1007/s10745-013-9578-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2015. Coffee agroecology: A new approach to understanding agricultural biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainable development. 1st ed. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reséndiz-Paz, M. D. L. L., M. D. C. Gutiérrez-Castorena, E. V. Gutiérrez-Castorena, C. A. Ortiz-Solorio, L. Cajuste-Bontempts, and P. Sánchez-Guzmán. 2013. Local soil knowledge and management of Anthrosols: A case study in Teoloyucan, Mexico. Geoderma 193–194:41–51. doi:10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2012.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezende de Melo, B. M., C. M. Paglis, M. S. de Oliveira, M. B. R. Teixeira, and J. da Silva. 2017. Management areas due to soil properties, topography and productivity of coffee plantations. BRAGANTIA 9:49–59. doi:10.18406/2316-1817v9n22017924.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, J. 1982. Cation exchange capacity. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, ed. A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, 149–158 Wisconsin, EUA: Agronomy Monograph.
   Google Scholar
• Rogé, P., A. R. Friedman, M. Astier, and M. A. Altieri. 2014. Farmer strategies for dealing with climatic variability: A case study from the Mixteca Alta region of Oaxaca, Mexico. Agroecology for Sustainable Food Systems 38 (7):786–811. doi:10.1080/21683565.2014.900842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, R. 2003. Local soil knowledge and site suitability evaluation in the Dominican Republic. Geoderma 111 (3–4):289–305. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00269-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Hernández, R., L. Méndez-De la Cruz, D. J. Palma-López, and F. Bautista-Zuñiga. 2018. Ch’ol nomenclature for soil classification in the ejido Oxolotán, Tacotalpa, Tabasco, México. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 14 (38):1–8. doi:10.1186/s13002-018-0236-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoeneberger, P. J., D. A. Wysocki, and E. C. Benham. 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils. 3.0 ed. Lincoln, NE: National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). 2023. Producción mensual agrícola para el cultivo de café. Disponible en: https://nube.siap.gob.mx/avance_agricola/
   Google Scholar
• Tolessa, K., J. D’heer, L. Duchateau, and P. Boeckx. 2017. Influence of growing altitude, shade and harvest period on quality and biochemical composition of Ethiopian specialty coffee. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97 (9):2849–57. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinh, L. T. K., A. H. Hu, Y. C. Lan, and Z. H. Chen. 2020. Comparative life cycle assessment for conventional and organic coffee cultivation in Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 17 (3):1307–24. doi:10.1007/s13762-019-02539-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trocha, L., B. Bulaj, P. Kutczynska, J. Mucha, P. Rutkowski, and M. Zadworny. 2017. The interactive impact of root branch order and soil genetic horizon on root respiration and nitrogen concentration. Tree Physiology 37 (8):1055–68. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpx096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, S., C. Rigal, T. Liebig, R. Mremi, A. Hemp, M. Jones, E. Price, and R. Preziosi. 2019. Ecosystem services and importance of common tree species in coffee-agroforestry systems: Local knowledge of small-scale farmers at mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Forests 10 (2):963. doi:10.3390/f10110963.
   Google Scholar
• Worku, M., B. Meulenaer, L. Duchateau, and P. Boeckx. 2018. Effect of altitude on biochemical composition and quality of green arabica coffee beans can be affected by shade and postharvest processing method, Food Res. Int 105:278–85. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.016.
   Google Scholar
• WRB. IUSS Working Group. 2015. International classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps, 2015a ed. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar