MRCK: a master regulator of tissue remodeling or another ‘ROCK’ in the epithelial block?

References

• Mellman I, Nelson WJ. Coordinated protein sorting, targeting and distribution in polarized cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(833–845):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2525.
   Google Scholar
• Zihni C, Mills C, Matter K, Balda MS. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(564–580):564–580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2016.80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zihni C, Terry SJ. RhoGTPase signalling at epithelial tight junctions: bridging the GAP between polarity and cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;64(120–125):120–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2015.02.020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zihni C, Munro PMG, Elbediwy A, Keep NH, Terry SJ, Harris J, Balda MS, Matter K. Dbl3 drives Cdc42 signaling at the apical margin to regulate junction position and apical differentiation. J Cell Biol. 2014;204(111–127):111–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201304064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan B, Yatim SMJM, Peng S, Gunaratne J, Hunziker W, Ludwig A. The mammalian crumbs complex defines a distinct polarity domain apical of epithelial tight junctions. Curr Biol. 2020;30:2791–2804. e2796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano A, Asano K, Sasaki H, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Claudins in Caenorhabditis elegans: their distribution and barrier function in the epithelium. Curr Biol. 2003;13(1042–1046):1042–1046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00395-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz-Diaz C, Baonza G, Martin-Belmonte F. The vertebrate epithelial apical junctional complex: dynamic interplay between Rho GTPase activity and cell polarization processes. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2020;1862(183398):183398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hull BE, Staehelin LA. The terminal web. A reevaluation of its structure and function. J Cell Biol. 1979;81:67–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.81.1.67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall A. Rho family GTPases. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40(1378–1382):1378–1382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20120103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heasman SJ, Ridley AJ. Mammalian Rho GTPases: new insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(690–701):690–701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCormack J, Welsh NJ, Braga VM. Cycling around cell-cell adhesion with Rho GTPase regulators. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(379–391):379–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.097923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samarin S, Nusrat A. Regulation of epithelial apical junctional complex by Rho family GTPases. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009;14(1129–1142):1129–1142. doi:https://doi.org/10.2741/3298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terry S, Nie M, Matter K, Balda MS. Rho signaling and tight junction functions. Physiology (Bethesda). 2010;25(16–26):16–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00034.2009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearce LR, Komander D, Alessi DR. The nuts and bolts of AGC protein kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(9–22):9–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2822.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X, Yu X, Zack DJ, Zhu H, Qian J. TiGER: a database for tissue-specific gene expression and regulation. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9(271):271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unbekandt M, Olson MF. The actin-myosin regulatory MRCK kinases: regulation, biological functions and associations with human cancer. J Mol Med (Berl). 2014;92(217–225):217–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-014-1133-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng Y, Tan I, Lim L, Leung T. Expression of the human myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinase gamma is regulated by promoter DNA methylation and Sp1 binding. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(34156–34164):34156–34164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405252200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corpet F. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16(10881–10890):10881–10890. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/16.22.10881.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung T, Chen XQ, Tan I, Manser E, Lim L. Myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinase acts as a Cdc42 effector in promoting cytoskeletal reorganization. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(130–140):130–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.18.1.130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo L, Lee T, Tsai L, Tang G, Jan LY, Jan YN. Genghis Khan (Gek) as a putative effector for Drosophila Cdc42 and regulator of actin polymerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(12963–12968). doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.24.12963.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz J, Proff J, Hävemeier A, Ladwein M, Rottner K, Barlag B, Pich A, Tatge H, Just I, Gerhard R, et al. Serine-71 phosphorylation of Rac1 modulates downstream signaling. PLoS One. 2012;7(e44358):e44358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heikkila T, Wheatley E, Crighton D, Schroder E, Boakes A, Kaye SJ, Mezna M, Pang L, Rushbrooke M, Turnbull A, et al. Co-crystal structures of inhibitors with MRCKbeta, a key regulator of tumor cell invasion. PLoS One. 2011;6(e24825):e24825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clayton NS, Ridley AJ. Targeting Rho GTPase signaling networks in cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8(222). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00222.
   Google Scholar
• Tan I, Seow KT, Lim L, Leung T. Intermolecular and intramolecular interactions regulate catalytic activity of myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinase alpha. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(2767–2778):2767–2778. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.8.2767-2778.2001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi SH, Czifra G, Kedei N, Lewin NE, Lazar J, Pu Y, Marquez VE, Blumberg PM. Characterization of the interaction of phorbol esters with the C1 domain of MRCK (myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42 binding kinase) alpha/beta. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(10543–10549):10543–10549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M707463200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madaule P, Eda M, Watanabe N, Fujisawa K, Matsuoka T, Bito H, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S. Role of citron kinase as a target of the small GTPase Rho in cytokinesis. Nature. 1998;394(491–494):491–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/28873.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zihni C, Vlassaks E, Terry S, Carlton J, Leung TKC, Olson M, Pichaud F, Balda MS, Matter K. An apical MRCK-driven morphogenetic pathway controls epithelial polarity. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(1049–1060):1049–1060. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3592.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kale VP, Hengst JA, Desai DH, Amin SG, Yun JK. The regulatory roles of ROCK and MRCK kinases in the plasticity of cancer cell migration. Cancer Lett. 2015;361(185–196):185–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.03.017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowan CR, Hyman AA. Acto-myosin reorganization and PAR polarity in C. elegans. Development. 2007;134(6):1035–1043. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.000513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Johnston D, Ahringer J. Cell polarity in eggs and epithelia: parallels and diversity. Cell. 2010;141(757–774):757–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morais-de-sa E, Mirouse V, St Johnston D. aPKC phosphorylation of Bazooka defines the apical/lateral border in Drosophila epithelial cells. Cell. 2010;141(509–523):509–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.040.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walther RF, Pichaud F. Crumbs/DaPKC-dependent apical exclusion of Bazooka promotes photoreceptor polarity remodeling. Curr Biol. 2010;20(1065–1074):1065–1074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.049.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima H, Tanoue T. The circumferential actomyosin belt in epithelial cells is regulated by the Lulu2-p114RhoGEF system. Small GTPases. 2012;3(91–96):91–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.4161/sgtp.19112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauvanet C, Wayt J, Pelaseyed T, Bretscher A. Structure, regulation, and functional diversity of microvilli on the apical domain of epithelial cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31(593–621):593–621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sawyer JM, Harrell JR, Shemer G, Sullivan-Brown J, Roh-Johnson M, Goldstein B. Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2010;341(5–19):5–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma X, Lynch HE, Scully PC, Hutson MS. Probing embryonic tissue mechanics with laser hole drilling. Phys Biol. 2009;6(36004):036004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/6/3/036004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roh-Johnson M, Shemer G, Higgins CD, McClellan JH, Werts AD, Tulu US, Gao L, Betzig E, Kiehart DP, Goldstein B, et al. Triggering a cell shape change by exploiting preexisting actomyosin contractions. Science. 2012;335(1232–1235):1232–1235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217869.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samarage CR, White M, Álvarez Y, Fierro-González J, Henon Y, Jesudason E, Bissiere S, Fouras A, Plachta N. Cortical Tension Allocates the First Inner Cells of the Mammalian Embryo. Dev Cell. 2015;34(435–447):435–447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin AC, Goldstein B. Apical constriction: themes and variations on a cellular mechanism driving morphogenesis. Development. 2014;141(1987–1998):1987–1998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.102228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez-Diaz A, Toyama Y, Abravanel DL, Wiemann JM, Wells AR, Tulu US, Edwards GS, Kiehart DP. Actomyosin purse strings: renewable resources that make morphogenesis robust and resilient. Hfsp J. 2008;2(220–237):220–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.2976/1.2955565.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nance J, Priess JR. Cell polarity and gastrulation in C. elegans. Development. 2002;129:387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Goldstein B. Mechanisms of cell positioning during C. elegans gastrulation. Development. 2003;130:307–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AC, Gelbart M, Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Kaschube M, Wieschaus EF. Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J Cell Biol. 2010;188(735–749):735–749. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200910099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borghi N, Sorokina M, Shcherbakova OG, Weis WI, Pruitt BL, Nelson WJ, Dunn AR. E-cadherin is under constitutive actomyosin-generated tension that is increased at cell-cell contacts upon externally applied stretch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(12568–12573):12568–12573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204390109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marston DJ, Higgins C, Peters K, Cupp T, Dickinson D, Pani A, Moore R, Cox A, Kiehart D, Goldstein B, et al. MRCK-1 Drives Apical Constriction in C. elegans by Linking Developmental Patterning to Force Generation. Curr Biol. 2016;26:2079–2089. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macara IG, Guyer R, Richardson G, Huo Y, Ahmed SM. Epithelial homeostasis. Curr Biol. 2014;24(R815–825):R815–R825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.068.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblatt J, Raff MC, Cramer LP. An epithelial cell destined for apoptosis signals its neighbors to extrude it by an actin- and myosin-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol. 2001;11(1847–1857):1847–1857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00587-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuipers D, Mehonic A, Kajita M, Peter L, Fujita Y, Duke T, Charras G, Gale JE. Epithelial repair is a two-stage process driven first by dying cells and then by their neighbours. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(1229–1241):1229–1241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.138289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu SK, Lagendijk AK, Hogan BM, Gomez GA, Yap AS. Active contractility at E-cadherin junctions and its implications for cell extrusion in cancer. Cell Cycle. 2015;14(315–322):315–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.4161/15384101.2014.989127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu Y, Forostyan T, Sabbadini R, Rosenblatt J. Epithelial cell extrusion requires the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 pathway. J Cell Biol. 2011;193(667–676):667–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010075.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(495–516):495–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701320337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullen SP, Martin SJ. Caspase activation pathways: some recent progress. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16(935–938):935–938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2009.59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black RA, Kronheim SR, Merriam JE, March CJ, Hopp TP. A pre-aspartate-specific protease from human leukocytes that cleaves pro-interleukin-1 beta. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(5323–5326):5323–5326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)83546-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawford ED, Wells JA. Caspase substrates and cellular remodeling. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80(1055–1087):1055–1087. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061809-121639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown SB, Bailey K, Savill J. Actin is cleaved during constitutive apoptosis. Biochem J. 1997;323(Pt 1):233–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3230233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mashima T, Naito M, Tsuruo T. Caspase-mediated cleavage of cytoskeletal actin plays a positive role in the process of morphological apoptosis. Oncogene. 1999;18(2423–2430):2423–2430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desouza M, Gunning PW, Stehn JR. The actin cytoskeleton as a sensor and mediator of apoptosis. Bioarchitecture. 2012;2(75–87):75–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.4161/bioa.20975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croft DR, Coleman ML, Li S, Robertson D, Sullivan T, Stewart CL, Olson MF. Actin-myosin-based contraction is responsible for apoptotic nuclear disintegration. J Cell Biol. 2005;168(245–255):245–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200409049.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman ML, Sahai EA, Yeo M, Bosch M, Dewar A, Olson MF. Membrane blebbing during apoptosis results from caspase-mediated activation of ROCK I. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(339–345):339–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35070009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickman GR, Julian L, Mardilovich K, Schumacher S, Munro J, Rath N, Zander SA, Mleczak A, Sumpton D, Morrice N, et al. Blebs produced by actin-myosin contraction during apoptosis release damage-associated molecular pattern proteins before secondary necrosis occurs. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(1293–1305):1293–1305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2013.69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunez R, Sancho-Martinez SM, Novoa JM, Lopez-Hernandez FJ. Apoptotic volume decrease as a geometric determinant for cell dismantling into apoptotic bodies. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17(1665–1671):1665–1671. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2010.96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sebbagh M, Renvoizé C, Hamelin J, Riché N, Bertoglio J, Bréard J. Caspase-3-mediated cleavage of ROCK I induces MLC phosphorylation and apoptotic membrane blebbing. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(346–352):346–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35070019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagliardi PA, Somale D, Puliafito A, Chiaverina G, Di Blasio L, Oneto M, Bianchini P, Bussolino F, Primo L. MRCKalpha is activated by caspase cleavage to assemble an apical actin ring for epithelial cell extrusion. J Cell Biol. 2018;217(231–249):231–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201703044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrache I, Crow MT, Neuss M, Garcia JG. Central involvement of Rho family GTPases in TNF-alpha-mediated bovine pulmonary endothelial cell apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;306(244–249):244–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00945-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unbekandt M, Belshaw S, Bower J, Clarke M, Cordes J, Crighton D, Croft DR, Drysdale MJ, Garnett MJ, Gill K, et al. Discovery of potent and selective MRCK inhibitors with therapeutic effect on skin cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(2096–2114):2096–2114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2870.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz G, Just I, Kaina B. Rho GTPases are over-expressed in human tumors. Int J Cancer. 1999;81(682–687):682–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990531)81:5<682::aid-ijc2>3.0.co;2-b.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamai T, Yamanishi T, Shirataki H, Takagi K, Asami H, Ito Y, Yoshida K-I. Overexpression of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 GTPases is associated with progression in testicular cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(4799–4805):4799–4805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0436-03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MDM, Medina JI, Velazquez L, Dharmawardhane S. Targeting Rac and Cdc42 GEFs in metastatic cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8(201). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00201.
   Google Scholar
• Takami Y, Higashi M, Kumagai S, Kuo PC, Kawana H, Koda K, Miyazaki M, Harigaya K. The activity of RhoA is correlated with lymph node metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(467–473):467–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9887-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigues P, Macaya I, Bazzocco S, Mazzolini R, Andretta E, Dopeso H, Mateo-Lozano S, Bilić J, Cartón-García F, Nieto R, et al. RHOA inactivation enhances Wnt signalling and promotes colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2014;5(5458). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6458
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S, Paterson HF, Marshall CJ. Cdc42-MRCK and Rho-ROCK signalling cooperate in myosin phosphorylation and cell invasion. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(255–261):255–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waclaw B, Bozic I, Pittman ME, Hruban RH, Vogelstein B, Nowak MA. A spatial model predicts that dispersal and cell turnover limit intratumour heterogeneity. Nature. 2015;525(261–264):261–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14971.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loo CS, Chen C-W, Wang P-J, Chen P-Y, Lin S-Y, Khoo K-H, Fenton RA, Knepper MA, Yu M-J. Quantitative apical membrane proteomics reveals vasopressin-induced actin dynamics in collecting duct cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(17119–17124):17119–17124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1309219110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett K, Leptin M, Settleman J. The Rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell. 1997;91(905–915):905–915. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80482-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacker U, Perrimon N. DRhoGEF2 encodes a member of the Dbl family of oncogenes and controls cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1998;12(274–284):274–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.2.274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terry SJ, Zihni C, Elbediwy A, Vitiello E, Leefa Chong San IV, Balda MS, Matter K. Spatially restricted activation of RhoA signalling at epithelial junctions by p114RhoGEF drives junction formation and morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(159–166):159–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Z, Manser E. Myotonic dystrophy kinase-related Cdc42-binding kinases (MRCK), the ROCK-like effectors of Cdc42 and Rac1. Small GTPases. 2015;6(81–88):81–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21541248.2014.1000699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima H, Tanoue T. Lulu2 regulates the circumferential actomyosin tensile system in epithelial cells through p114RhoGEF. J Cell Biol. 2011;195(245–261):245–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201104118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoege C, Hyman AA. Principles of PAR polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(315–322):315–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson F, Pinal N, Fichelson P, Pichaud F. Atonal and EGFR signalling orchestrate rok- and Drak-dependent adherens junction remodelling during ommatidia morphogenesis. Development. 2012;139(3432–3441):3432–3441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.080762.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corrigall D, Walther RF, Rodriguez L, Fichelson P, Pichaud F. Hedgehog signaling is a principal inducer of Myosin-II-driven cell ingression in Drosophila epithelia. Dev Cell. 2007;13(730–742):730–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Escudero LM, Bischoff M, Freeman M. Myosin II regulates complex cellular arrangement and epithelial architecture in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2007;13(717–729):717–729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.09.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumfer KT, Cook SJ, Squirrell JM, Eliceiri KW, Peel N, O’Connell KF, White JG. CGEF-1 and CHIN-1 Regulate CDC-42 activity during asymmetric division in the Caenorhabditis elegans Embryo. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(266–277):266–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-01-0060.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang SC, Low TYF, Nishimura Y, Gole L, Yu W, Motegi F. Cortical forces and CDC-42 control clustering of PAR proteins for Caenorhabditis elegans embryonic polarization. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(988–995):988–995. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3577.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fic W, Bastock R, Raimondi F, Los E, Inoue Y, Gallop JL, Russell RB, St Johnston D. RhoGAP19D inhibits Cdc42 laterally to control epithelial cell shape and prevent invasion. J Cell Biol. 2021;220(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202009116.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson DC, Gill JS, Cinalli RM, Nance J. Polarization of the C. elegans embryo by RhoGAP-mediated exclusion of PAR-6 from cell contacts. Science. 2008;320(5884):1771–1774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Riechmann V. The role of the actomyosin cytoskeleton in coordination of tissue growth during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr Biol. 2007;17(1349–1355):1349–1355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar