Assessment of polycaprolacton (PCL) nanocomposite scaffold compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) on healing of segmental femur bone defect in rabbits

References

• Anderson JM, Shive MS. 1997. Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 28:5–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee IY, Agarwal V, Persivale J, Trenkabenthin S, et al. 1995. Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture. Biomaterials. 16:1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhakta S, Pattanayak D, Takadama H, Kokubo T, Miller C, Mirsaneh M, et al. 2010. Prediction of osteoconductive activity of modified potassium fluorrichterite glass-ceramics by immersion in simulated body fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 21:2979–2988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcanti SC, Pereira CL, Mazzonetto R, de Moraes M, Moreira RW. 2008. Histological and histomorphometric analyses of calcium phosphate cement in rabbit calvaria. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 36:354–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, wright LD, Guzzo R, Freeman JW, Drissi DH, Nair LS. 2014. Poly(d-lactide)/poly(caprolactone) nanofiber-thermogelling chitosan gel composite scaffolds for osteochondral tissue regeneration in a rat model. J Bioact Compat Polym. 28:115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diba M, Fathi MH, Kharaziha M. 2011. Novel forsterite/polycaprolactone nanocomposite scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Mater Lett. 65:1931–1934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diba M, Kharaziha M, Fathi MH, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Samadikuchaksaraei A. 2012. Preparation and characterization of polycaprolactone/forsterite nanocomposite porous scaffolds designed for bone tissue regeneration. Compos Sci Technol. 72:716–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta D, Venugopal J, Mitra S, Giri Dev VR, Ramakrishna S. 2009. Nanostructured biocomposite substrates by electrospinning and electrospraying for the mineralization of osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 30:2085–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Shi X, Ren L, Du C, Wang Y. 2010. PHBV microspheres-PLGA matrix composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 31:4278–4285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hule RA, Pochan DJ. 2007. Polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications. MRS Bull. 32:354–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen A, Reolfing HD, Le DQS, Kristiansen AA, Nygaard JV, Hokland LB, et al. 2013. Surface-modified functionalized polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone repair: in vitro and in vivo experiments. J Biomed Mater Res. 102:2993–3003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamath MS, Ahmed SSJ, Dhanasekaran M, Santosh S. 2014. Polycaprolactone scaffold engineered for sustained release of resveratrol: therapeutic enhancement in bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 9:183–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenawy ER, Abdel-Hay FI, El-Newehy MH, Wnek GE. 2009. Processing of polymer nanofibers through electrospinning as drug delivery systems. Mater Chem Phys. 113:296–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khang D, Carpenter J, Chun YW, Pareta R, Webster TJ. 2008. Nanotechnology for regenerative medicine. Biomed Microdevices. 12:575–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung V, Ko F. 2010. Biomedical applications of nanofibers. Polym Adv Technol. 22:350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Vepari C, Jin HJ, Kim HJ, Kaplan DL. 2006. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 27:3115–3124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linh NT, Min YK, Song HY, Lee BT. 2010. Fabrication of polyvinyl alcohol/gelatin nanofiber composites and evaluation of their material properties. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 95:184–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Diaz S, Garcia-Giralt N, Lebourg M, Gó mez Tejedor JA, Vila G, Caceres E, et al. 2009. In vivo evaluation of 3-Dimensional polycaprolactone scaffolds for cartilage repair in rabbits. Am J Sports Med. 20:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Meng ZX, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF. 2010. Fabrication and characterization of three-dimensional nanofiber membrance of PCL–MWCNTs by electrospinning. Mater Sci Eng C. 30:1014–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra N, Goyal AK, Khatri K, Vaidya B, Paliwal R, Rai S, et al. 2008. Biodegradable polymer based particulate carrier (s) for the delivery of proteins and peptides. Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 7:240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsak AG, Kemppainen JM, Harris MT, Hollister S. t. 2011. Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A. 17:1831–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi G, Sharifi D, mohajeri D, Rezaie A, Mortazavi P, Soroori S, Hesaraki S. 2010. Effect of calcium phosphate bone cement and type 1 collagen mixture on healing of segmental bone defect in rabbit radius. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 4:5144–5153.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk A, Yetkin H, Memis L, Cila E, Bolukbasi S, Gemalmaz C. 2006. Demineralized bone matrix and hydroxyapatite/tri-calcium phosphate mixture for bone healing in rats. Int Orthop. 30:147–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qingchun Z, Ke T, Zhaoyang Y, Yan Z, Wensong T, Meidong L. 2012. Preparation of open porous polycaprolactone microspheres and their applications as effective cell carriers in hydrogel system. Mater Sci Eng C. 32:2589–2595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roohani-Esfahani SI, Nouri-Khorasani S, Lu Z, Appleyard R, Zreiqat H. 2010. The influence hydroxyapatite nanoparticle shape and size on the properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds coated with hydroxyapatite-PCL composites. Biomaterials. 31:5498–5509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno A, Zeppetelli S, Di Maio E, Iannace S, Netti PA. 2012. Architecture and properties of bi-modal porous scaffolds for bone regeneration prepared via supercritical CO2 foaming and porogen leaching combined process. J Supercrit Fluids. 67:114–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher M, Uhl F, Detsch R, Deisinger U, Ziegler G. 2010. Static and dynamic cultivation of bone marrow stromal cells on biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds derived from an indirect rapid prototyping technique. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 21:3039–3048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergroesen PPA, Kroeze RJ, Helder MN, Smit TH. 2011. The use of poly (L-lactide-co-caprolactone) as a scaffold for adipose stem cells in bone tissue engineering: application in a spinal fusion model. Macromol Biosci. 11:722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G, Ma PX. 2008. Nanostructured biomaterials for regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 18:3566–3582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winey KI, Vaia RA. 2007. Polymer nanocomposites. MRS Bull. 32:314–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. 2010. The return of a forgotten polymer–polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 35:1217–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SF, Leong KF, Du ZH, Chua CK. 2001. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 7:679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yun HS, Park JW, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Jang JH. 2011. Effect of the pore structure of bioactive glass balls on biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater. 7:2651–2660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P. 2010. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 6:2540–2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Zhang X, Cai Q, Wang B, Deng X, Yang X. 2010. Microfibrous β-TCP/collagen scaffolds mimic woven bone in structure and composition. Biomed Mater. 5:065005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar