Development and characterization dual responsive magnetic nanocomposites for targeted drug delivery systems

Reference

• Kim JH, Chae M, Kim WK, et al. Salinomycin sensitizes cancer cells to the effects of doxorubicin and etoposide treatment by increasing DNA damage and reducing p21 protein. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;162:773–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C-C, Li T-K, Farh L, et al. Structural basis of type II topoisomerase inhibition by the anticancer drug etoposide. Science. 2011;333:459–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasinoff BB, Herman EH. Dexrazoxane: how it works in cardiac and tumor cells. Is it a prodrug or is it a drug? Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2007;7:140–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng S, Yan T, Jendrny C, et al. Dexrazoxane may prevent doxorubicin-induced DNA damage via depleting both topoisomerase II isoforms. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama T, Sadzuka Y. Theanine and glutamate transporter inhibitors enhance the antitumor efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003;1653:47–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Lee JS, Zhang M. Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1252–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egusquiaguirre SP, Igartua M, Hernández RM, et al. Nanoparticle delivery systems for cancer therapy: advances in clinical and preclinical research. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012;14:83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Zeng X, Li P. Nanomaterials in cancer-therapy drug delivery system. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9:741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolas J, Mura S, Brambilla D, et al. Design, functionalization strategies and biomedical applications of targeted biodegradable/biocompatible polymer-based nanocarriers for drug delivery. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:1147–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan VP, Jain RK. Strategies for advancing cancer nanomedicine. Nat Mater. 2013;12:958–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye F, Barrefelt Å, Asem H, et al. Biodegradable polymeric vesicles containing magnetic nanoparticles, quantum dots and anticancer drugs for drug delivery and imaging. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3885–3894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A, Rashid R, Murtaza G, et al. Gold nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in drug delivery. Trop J Pharm Res. 2014;13:1169–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TM, Cullis PR. Liposomal drug delivery systems: from concept to clinical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:36–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen JW, Martinez E, Louka P, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for selective destruction of tumor cells and potential for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7:1063–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou X, Ali Z, Li S, et al. Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in targeted drug delivery system. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15:54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mody VV, Cox A, Shah S, et al. Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery systems for targeting tumor. Appl Nanosci. 2014;4:385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadatjou N, Fattahi H. Core–shell pH-responsive poly (vinylpyrrolidone)-block-poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (methacrylic acid) coated magnetic nanoparticle as a carrier for delivery of poorly water-soluble lovastatin. Pharm Chem J. 2017;51:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alimohammadi YH, Joo SW. PLGA-based nanoparticles as cancer drug delivery systems. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:517–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venkatasubbu GD, Ramasamy S, Avadhani G, et al. Surface modification and paclitaxel drug delivery of folic acid modified polyethylene glycol functionalized hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Powder Technol. 2013;235:437–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler A, Vandermeulen GW, Klok H-A. Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhosh PB, Ulrih NP. Multifunctional superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: promising tools in cancer theranostics. Cancer Lett. 2013;336:8–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Hu Y, Du Y, et al. Redox-responsive polymer–drug conjugates based on doxorubicin and chitosan oligosaccharide-g-stearic acid for cancer therapy. Mol Pharm. 2015;12:1193–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Pan D, Luo K, et al. Dendrimer–doxorubicin conjugate as enzyme-sensitive and polymeric nanoscale drug delivery vehicle for ovarian cancer therapy. Polym Chem. 2014;5:5227–5235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Sun C, Yan L. Galactose targeted pH-responsive copolymer conjugated with near infrared fluorescence probe for imaging of intelligent drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:2104–2115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Lin S, Feng Y, et al. CO2-responsive polymer materials. Polym Chem. 2017;8:12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Schattling P, Theato P. Thermo-and CO2-responsive linear polymers and hydrogels as CO2 capturing materials. Sci Adv Mater. 2015;7:948–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater. 2013;12:991–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CY, Yang YQ, Huang TX, et al. Self-assembled pH-responsive MPEG-b-(PLA-co-PAE) block copolymer micelles for anticancer drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6273–6283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng R, Meng F, Deng C, et al. Dual and multi-stimuli responsive polymeric nanoparticles for programmed site-specific drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3647–3657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerweck LE, Seetharaman K. Cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: potential exploitation for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Res. 1996;56:1194–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlovskaya V, Kharlampieva E, Mansfield ML, et al. Poly (methacrylic acid) hydrogel films and capsules: response to pH and ionic strength, and encapsulation of macromolecules. Chem Mater. 2006;18:328–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue W, Champ S, Huglin MB. Thermoreversible swelling behaviour of hydrogels based on N-isopropylacrylamide with a zwitterionic comonomer. Eur Polym J. 2001;37:869–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibayama M, Mizutani S-y, Nomura S. Thermal properties of copolymer gels containing N-isopropylacrylamide. Macromolecules. 1996;29:2019–2024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Guan J. Thermosensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8:991–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veronese FM, Pasut G. PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov Today. 2005;10:1451–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Zhu L, Torchilin VP. pH-sensitive poly (histidine)-PEG/DSPE-PEG co-polymer micelles for cytosolic drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1213–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaied O, Delaite C, Riess G. Synthesis of PCL-b-PVAc block copolymers by combination of click chemistry, ROP, and RAFT polymerizations. Polym Bull. 2012;68:607–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H. Controlled/”living” radical precipitation polymerization: a versatile polymerization technique for advanced functional polymers. Eur Polym J. 2013;49:579–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moad G, Chiefari J, Krstina J, et al. Living free radical polymerization with reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (the life of RAFT). Polym Int. 2000;49:993–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe AB, McCormick CL. Reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) radical polymerization and the synthesis of water-soluble (co) polymers under homogeneous conditions in organic and aqueous media. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32:283–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy KR, Park W, Sin BC, et al. Synthesis of electrically conductive and superparamagnetic monodispersed iron oxide-conjugated polymer composite nanoparticles by in situ chemical oxidative polymerization. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;335:34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan M, Murugan M, Ponnamma D, et al. Poly-carboxylic acids functionalized chitosan nanocarriers for controlled and targeted anti-cancer drug delivery. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;83:201–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Y, Liu P, Liu C-H, et al. Doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous magnetic nanoparticles to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;69:355–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad P, Nosratollah Z, Mohammad R, et al. The inhibitory effect of Curcuma longa extract on telomerase activity in A549 lung cancer cell line. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:912.
   Google Scholar
• Guo M, Yan Y, Zhang H, et al. Magnetic and pH-responsive nanocarriers with multilayer core–shell architecture for anticancer drug delivery. J Mater Chem. 2008;18:5104–5112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Hoffman AS, Stayton PS. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-propylacrylic acid) copolymers that respond sharply to temperature and pH. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:1381–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao G, Deng H, Huang Q, et al. Preparation and characterization of pH sensitive semi-interpenetrating network hydrogel based on methacrylic acid, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and PEG. J Polym Res. 2006;13:349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman MJ, Decker EA, Goddard JM. Fourier transform infrared studies on the dissociation behavior of metal-chelating polyelectrolyte brushes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:5383–5387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Ahmadov IS, Kadirov SG. Two types of kinetics of membrane potential of water plant leaves illuminated by ultraviolet light. Bioelectrochemistry. 2002;58:189–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Khomutov GB, Tikhonov AN. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on structural-functional characteristics of the thylakoid membrane. Russ Plant Physiol. 1993;3:338–342.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef NA, Gurbanov EM, Haciyeva SR, et al. Antioxidant enzymes, fluctuating asymmetry and morphological changes of urban trees as an ecological indicator of heavy metal stress. Int J Pharm Sci Health Care. 2013;1:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Nasibova AN, Serezhenkov VA, et al. Accumulation of magnetic nanoparticles in plants grown on soils of Apsheron peninsula. Biophysics. 2011;56:316–322.
   Google Scholar
• Khalilov RI, Akhmetov IS, Goldfeld M. Binary response of the membrane-potential in the leaf-cells of Vallisneria Spiralis on pulsed UV excitation. Doklady Akademii Nauk. 1992;4:850–852.
   Google Scholar
• Asghari F, Samiei M, Adibkia K, et al. Biodegradable and biocompatible polymers for tissue engineering application: a review. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskandari L, Akbarzadeh A, Zarghami N, et al. Gold nanoprobe-based method for sensing activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) gene expression, as a breast cancerBiomarker. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadian F, Abhari A, Nejati-Koshki K, et al. New state of nanofibers in regenerative medicine. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeid Shabestari K, Masoud F, Abolfazl A, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation methods, applications in cancer diagnosis and cancer therapy. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:6–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonia Fathi K, Majid M, Yunes P, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and treatment: a review. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh A, Somi MH, Darabi M, et al. Liposome-mediated RNA interference delivery against Erk1 and Erk2 does not equally promote chemosensitivity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017. DOI:10.1080/21691401.2016.1269117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrigan P, Wong K, Redelmeier T, et al. Accumulation of doxorubicin and other lipophilic amines into large unilamellar vesicles in response to transmembrane pH gradients. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 1993;1149:329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schu¨wer N, Klok H-A. Tuning the pH sensitivity of poly(methacrylic acid) brushes. Langmuir. 2011;27:4789–4796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Bromberg L, Lin S, et al. Complexation and release of doxorubicin from its complexes with pluronic P85-b-poly(acrylic acid) block copolymers. J Control Release. 2007;121:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialik-Wąs K, Pielichowski K. Poly (acrylic acid-co-methyl methacrylate)/metronidazole systems: synthesis and complexation. Acta Biochim Pol. 2013;60:835–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanamala M, Wilson WR, Yang M, et al. Mechanisms and biomaterials in pH-responsive tumour targeted drug delivery: a review. Biomaterials. 2016;85:152–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar