Disrupting the intramolecular interaction between proto-oncogene c-Src SH3 domain and its self-binding peptide PPII with rationally designed peptide ligands

References

• Makarov AA, Monaselidze DR, Esipova NG. Intermolecular interactions of globular proteins in the crystal state. Int J Quantum Chem. 1979;16:437–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood DJ. Protein structures from domain packing-a game of twenty questions? Biophys J. 1995;69:2183–2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsalaki E, Russell RB. Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:344–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Zhang S, He P, et al. Self-binding peptides: folding or binding? J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55:329–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Zhang S, Bai Z, et al. A two-step binding mechanism for the self-binding peptide recognition of target domains. Mol Biosyst. 2016;12:1201–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Z, Hou S, Zhang S, et al. Targeting self-binding peptides as a novel strategy to regulate protein activity and function: a case study on the proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase c-Src. J Chem Inf Model. 2017;57:835–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler DL, Iida M, Dunn EF. The role of Src in solid tumors. Oncologist. 2009;14:667–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard SR. Src autoinhibition: let us count the ways. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:711–714.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, et al. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem. 2003;24:1999–2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case DA, Cheatham TE, 3rd, Darden T, et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1668–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) Method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:10089–10092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys. 1977;23:327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homeyer N, Gohlke H. Free energy calculations by the molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area method. Mol Inform. 2012;31:114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res. 2000;33:889–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case D. Normal mode analysis of protein dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1994;4:285–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweimer K, Hoffmann S, Bauer F, et al. Structural investigation of the binding of a herpesviral protein to the SH3 domain of tyrosine kinase Lck. Biochemistry. 2002;41:5120–5130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein A, Aloy P. Contextual specificity in peptide-mediated protein interactions. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saksela K, Permi P. SH3 domain ligand binding: what's the consensus and where's the specificity? FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2609–2614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Zhou P, Deng M, et al. Indirect readout in protein–peptide recognition: a different story from classical biomolecular recognition. J Chem Inf Model. 2014;54:2022–2032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Wei M. Conversion of MIG6 peptide from the nonbinder to binder of lung cancer-related EGFR by phosphorylation and cyclization. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:1023–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Chen JK, Yu H, et al. Two binding orientations for peptides to the Src SH3 domain: development of a general model for SH3–ligand interactions. Science. 1994;266:1241–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kami K, Takeya R, Sumimoto H, et al. Diverse recognition of non-PxxP peptide ligands by the SH3 domains from p67(phox), Grb2 and Pex13p. EMBO J. 2002;21:4268–4276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein–ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995;8:127–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL. Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins. 2009;77:778–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker KC, Bednarek MA, Coligan JE. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol. 1994;152:163–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Kasahara C, Rickles RJ, et al. Specific interactions outside the proline-rich core of two classes of Src homology 3 ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:12408–12415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salentin S, Schreiber S, Haupt VJ, et al. PLIP: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W443–W447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar