Use of qPCR for the analysis of population heterogeneity and dynamics during Lactobacillus delbrueckii spp. bulgaricus batch culture

References

• Quin C, Estaki M, Vollman DM, et al. Probiotic supplementation and associated infant gut microbiome and health: a cautionary retrospective clinical comparison. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8283–8283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang M-S, Yeu J-E, Hong S-P. Safety evaluation of oral care probiotics Weissella cibaria CMU and CMS1 by phenotypic and genotypic analysis. IJMS. 2019;20(11):2693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Tian M, Chen L, et al. Optimization of composite cryoprotectant for freeze-drying Bifidobacterium bifidum BB01 by response surface methodology. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):1559–1569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heins A-L, Reyelt J, Schmidt M, et al. Development and characterization of Escherichia coli triple reporter strains for investigation of population heterogeneity in bioprocesses. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19(1):14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzenpichler R, Krukenberg V, Spietz RL, et al. Next-generation physiology approaches to study microbiome function at single cell level. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(4):241–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber F, Ackermann M. Environmental drivers of metabolic heterogeneity in clonal microbial populations. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;62:202–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal UH, Westfall S, Prakash S. Novel microencapsulated probiotic blend for use in metabolic syndrome: design and in-vivo analysis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup3):S116–S124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese F, Voloshynoyska I, Musat F, et al. Quantitation and comparison of phenotypic heterogeneity among single cells of monoclonal microbial populations. Front Microbiol. 2019;10(2814):
   Google Scholar
• Schaechter M. A brief history of bacterial growth physiology. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Q, Tian J, Wang B, et al. PMA based real-time fluorescent LAMP for detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in viable but nonculturable state. Food Control. 2016;63:230–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv X, Wang L, Zhang J, et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of VBNC Escherichia coli O157: H7 in beef by PMAxx and real-time LAMP. Food Control. 2020;115:107292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parbhoo T, Sampson SL, Mouton JM. Recent developments in the application of flow cytometry to advance our understanding of Mycobacterium tuberculosis physiology and pathogenesis. Cytometry A. 2020;97(7):683–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Delbruck AI, Off CL, et al. Flow cytometry combined with single cell sorting to study heterogeneous germination of Bacillus spores under high pressure. Front Microbiol. 2020;10(3118):
   Google Scholar
• Roussel C, Galia W, Leriche F, et al. Comparison of conventional plating, PMA-qPCR, and flow cytometry for the determination of viable enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli along a gastrointestinal in vitro model. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(22):9793–9802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun RS, Mendis N, Li L, et al. Quantification of viable but non-culturable cells of Legionella pneumophila. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1921:45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heins A-L, Weuster-Botz D. Population heterogeneity in microbial bioprocesses: origin, analysis, mechanisms, and future perspectives. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2018;41(7):889–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller J, Rosenberg M, Riecken K, et al. Quantification of the dynamics of population heterogeneities in CHO cultures with stably integrated fluorescent markers. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2020;412(9):2065–2080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heins A-L, Lundin L, Nunes I, et al. The effect of acetate on population heterogeneity in different cellular characteristics of Escherichia coli in aerobic batch cultures. Biotechnol Prog. 2019;35(3):e2796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser A, Berthoud H, Eugster E, et al. Detection and enumeration of Lactobacillus helveticus in dairy products. Int Dairy J. 2017;68:52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong S-G, Lee JY, Yoon S-R, et al. A quantitative PCR based method using propidium monoazide for specific and sensitive detection of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum in kimchi cabbage (Brassica rapa L. subsp. pekinensis). Lwt-Food Sci Technol. 2019;113:108327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verruck S, Silva KJ, de Oliveira Santeli H, et al. Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis BB-12 enumeration by quantitative PCR assay in microcapsules with full-fat goat milk and inulin-type fructans. Food Res Int. 2020;133:109131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han L, Wang K, Ma L, et al. Viable but nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica in fresh produce: rapid determination by loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled with a propidium monoazide treatment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86(7):e02566–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai AL, Ben H-Y, Guo W-T, et al. Quantification of viable cells of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in tomato seed using propidium monoazide and a real-time pcr assay. Plant Dis. 2020;PDIS11192397RE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truchado P, Gil MI, Larrosa M, et al. Detection and quantification methods for viable but non-culturable (VBNC) cells in process wash water of fresh-cut produce: industrial validation. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong P, Zhang L, Zhang J, et al. Sampling method for studying the activity of lactic acid bacteria during spray drying. Drying Technol. 2018;36(10):1236–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Gong P, Zhang J, et al. Quantitative analysis of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus cell division and death using fluorescent dye tracking. J Microbiol Methods. 2020;169:105832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achilleos C, Berthier F. Quantitative PCR for the specific quantification of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus paracasei and its interest for Lactococcus lactis in cheese samples. Food Microbiol. 2013;36(2):286–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liu W, Xu H, et al. Propidium monoazide combined with real-time PCR for selective detection of viable Staphylococcus aureus in milk powder and meat products. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(3):1625–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias CO, Scariot MC, de Mello Castanho Amboni RD, et al. Application of propidium monoazide coupled with quantitative PCR to evaluate cell viability of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis in a non-dairy probiotic beverage. Ann Microbiol. 2020;70(1):22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cunha ET, Pedrolo AM, Paludo F, et al. Azospirillum brasilense viable cells enumeration using propidium monoazide-quantitative PCR. Arch Microbiol. 2020;202(7):1653–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt P, Surmann K, Salazar MG, et al. Alternative fluorescent labeling strategies for characterizing gram-positive pathogenic bacteria: flow cytometry supported counting, sorting, and proteome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus retrieved from infected host cells. Cytometry A. 2016;89(10):932–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocke M, Mundt K, Idler C, et al. Monitoring Lactobacillus plantarum in grass silages with the aid of 16S rDNA-based quantitative real-time PCR assays. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006;29(1):49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scariot MC, Venturelli GL, Prudêncio ES, et al. Quantification of Lactobacillus paracasei viable cells in probiotic yoghurt by propidium monoazide combined with quantitative PCR. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;264:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Wang Z, Bao Q, et al. Application of propidium monoazide quantitative real-time PCR to quantify the viability of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp bulgaricus. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(12):9570–9580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barer MR. Bacterial growth, culturability and viability. In: Tang Y-W, Liu D, Poxton I, Schwartzman J, editors. Molecular medical microbiology. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. USA: Academic Press; 2015. p. 181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S-Y, Kim M-J, Jung S-K, et al. Development of a fast real-time PCR assay based on TaqMan probe for identification of edible rice grasshopper (Oxya chinensis) in processed food products. Food Res Int. 2019;116:441–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai C-H, Wu S-R, Pang J-C, et al. Designing primers and evaluation of the efficiency of propidium monoazide – quantitative polymerase chain reaction for counting the viable cells of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus salivarius. J Food Drug Anal. 2017;25(3):533–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrimonti C, Bottari B, Sardaro MLS, et al. Application of real-time PCR (qPCR) for characterization of microbial populations and type of milk in dairy food products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(3):423–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruike W, Higashimori A, Yaguchi J, et al. Use of real-time PCR with propidium monoazide for enumeration of viable Escherichia coli in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol. 2016;74(5):1243–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv XC, Li Y, Qiu WW, et al. Development of propidium monoazide combined with real-time quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR) assays to quantify viable dominant microorganisms responsible for the traditional brewing of Hong Qu glutinous rice wine. Food Control. 2016;66:69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocker A, Cheung C-Y, Camper AK. Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods. 2006;67(2):310–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert G, Cotillard A, Fourmestraux C, et al. Droplet digital PCR improves absolute quantification of viable lactic acid bacteria in faecal samples. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;148:64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faille C, Brauge T, Leleu G, et al. Comparison of the performance of the biofilm sampling methods (swab, sponge, contact agar) in the recovery of Listeria monocytogenes populations considering the seafood environment conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;325:108626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diop M, Watier D, Masson PY, et al. Assessment of freshness and freeze-thawing of sea bream fillets (Sparus aurata) by a cytosolic enzyme: lactate dehydrogenase. Food Chem. 2016;210:428–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier RM, Pepper IL, Gentry TJ. Bacterial growth. Environmental Microbiology. 3rd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2014. p. 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Yao W, Mei C, Nan X, et al. Evaluation and comparison of in vitro degradation kinetics of DNA in serum, urine and saliva: a qualitative study. Gene. 2016;590(1):142–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castan A, Heidrich J, Enfors SO. The use of flow cytometry to detect nucleic acids attached to the surface of Escherichia coli in high cell density fed-batch processes. Biotechnol Lett. 2002;24(3):219–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen G, Johansen CL, Marten G, et al. Influence of extracellular pH on growth, viability, cell size, acidification activity, and intracellular pH of Lactococcus lactis in batch fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(13):5965–5976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Programmed death in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64(3):503–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangiaterra G, Amiri M, Di Cesare A, et al. Detection of viable but non-culturable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis by qPCR: a validation study. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H, Dong K, Rao L, et al. Quantitative detection of viable but nonculturable state Escherichia coli O157:H7 by ddPCR combined with propidium monoazide. Food Control. 2020;112:107140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rault A, Bouix M, Beal C. Dynamic analysis of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus CFL1 physiological characteristics during fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;81(3):559–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryall B, Eydallin G, Ferenci T. Culture history and population heterogeneity as determinants of bacterial adaptation: the adaptomics of a single environmental transition. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(3):597–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golod NA, Loiko NG, Mulyukin AL, et al. Adaptation of lactic acid bacteria to unfavorable growth conditions. Microbiology. 2009;78(3):280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Suo Y, Liao X, et al. Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus cell viability, sublethal injury and death induced by synergistic combination of ultrasound and mild heat. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017;39:101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Want A, Hancocks H, Thomas CR, et al. Multi-parameter flow cytometry and cell sorting reveal extensive physiological heterogeneity in Bacillus cereus batch cultures. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33(7):1395–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar