Molecular docking and physicochemical studies of 1,3-benzodioxole tagged Dacarbazine derivatives as an anticancer agent

References

• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan A, Hadfield JA, Lawrence NJ, et al. Tubulin as a target for anticancer drugs: agents which interact with the mitotic spindle. Med Res Rev. 1998;18(4):259–296. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199807)18:4<259::AID-MED3>3.0.CO;2-U.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar V, Kumar N, Tomar R, et al. Biological evaluation of noscapine analogues as potent and microtubule-targeted anticancer agents. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55839-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amos LA. Microtubule structure and its stabilisation. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2(15):2153–2160. doi: 10.1039/b403634d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwe J, Li H, Downing KH, et al. Refined structure of αβ-tubulin at 3.5 Å resolution. J Mol Biol. 2001;313(5):1045–1057. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Rathinasamy K, Mohan R, et al. Microtubule assembly dynamics: an attractive target for anticancer drugs. IUBMB Life. 2008;60(6):368–375. doi: 10.1002/iub.42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M, Iskander M. Microtubulin binding sites as target for developing anticancer agents. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2004;4(10):1077–1104. doi: 10.2174/1389557043402946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikstacka R, Stefański T, Różański J. Tubulin-interactive stilbene derivatives as anticancer agents. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2013;18(3):368–397. doi: 10.2478/s11658-013-0094-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong C, Devine SM, Abel A-C, et al. 1,3-benzodioxole-modified noscapine analogues: synthesis, antiproliferative activity, and tubulin-bound structure. ChemMedChem. 2021;16(18):2882–2894. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.202100363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehrawat H, Kumar N, Tomar R, et al. Synthesis and characterization of novel 1,3-benzodioxole tagged noscapine based ionic liquids with in silico and in vitro cytotoxicity analysis on HeLa cells. JMol Liq. 2020;302:112525. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micale N, Zappala M, Grasso S. Synthesis and antitumor activity of 1,3-benzodioxole derivatives. ChemInform. 2003;34(36):2–9. doi: 10.1002/chin.200336096.
   Google Scholar
• Sangeeta Sonaxi Tomar R, Agrawal S, Sarkar A, et al. 1, 3-benzodioxole tagged lidocaine based ionic liquids as anticancer drug : synthesis, characterization and in silico study. Chemistry Select. 2023;8:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Micale N, Zappalà M, Grasso S. Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of 1,3-benzodioxole derivatives. Note II. Farmaco. 2003;58(5):351–355. doi: 10.1016/S0014-827X(03)00053-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jurd L, Narayanan VL, Paull KD. In vivo antitumor activity of 6-benzyl-l,3-benzodioxole derivatives against the P388, L1210, B16, and M5076 murine models. J Med Chem. 1987;30(10):1752–1756. doi: 10.1021/jm00393a012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Tomar R, Pandey A, et al. Preclinical evaluation and molecular docking of 1,3-benzodioxole propargyl ether derivatives as novel inhibitor for combating the histone deacetylase enzyme in cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(6):1288–1299. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1369423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehrawat H, Kumar N, Sood D, et al. Mechanistic interaction of triflate based noscapine ionic liquid with BSA: spectroscopic and chemoinformatics approaches. J Mol Liq. 2020;315:113695. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehrawat H, Kumar N, Sood D, et al. Unraveling the interaction of an opium poppy alkaloid noscapine ionic liquid with human hemoglobin: biophysical and computational studies. JMolLiq. 2021;338:116710. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116710.
   Google Scholar
• Alshitari W. Investigating the binding measurements of human α-acid glycoprotein with chlorambucil and dacarbazine in the presence of imidazolium based -ionic liquid by affinity capillary electrophoresis. Arab J Chem. 2020;13(10):7445–7452. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagne JB, Kakumanu S, Nicolosi RJ. Nanoemulsion preparations of the anticancer drug dacarbazine significantly increase its efficacy in a xenograft mouse melanoma model. Mol Pharm. 2008;5(6):1055–1063. doi: 10.1021/mp8000556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Badr AA, Alodhaib MM. Dacarbazine. Profiles Drug Subst Excip Relat Methodol. 2016;41:323–377. doi: 10.1016/bs.podrm.2015.12.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li AP. Screening for human ADME/tox drug properties in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2001;6(7):357–366. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6446(01)01712-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mvondo JGM, Matondo A, Mawete DT, et al. In silico ADME/T properties of quinine derivatives using SwissADME and pkCSM webservers. IJTDH. 2021;42:1–12. doi: 10.9734/ijtdh/2021/v42i1130492.
   Google Scholar
• Kar S, Leszczynski J. Open access in silico tools to predict the ADMET profiling of drug candidates. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2020;15(12):1473–1487. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1798926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose PW, Bi C, Bluhm WF, et al. The RCSB protein data bank: new resources for research and education. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D475–D482. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elokely KM, Doerksen RJ. Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53(8):1934–1945. doi: 10.1021/ci400040d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 2018;27(1):293–315. doi: 10.1002/pro.3330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskowski RA, Jabłońska J, Pravda L, et al. PDBsum: structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci. 2018;27(1):129–134. doi: 10.1002/pro.3289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthy R, Bowei J, Einsenberg D. Verify3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Meth Enzymol. 1997;277:396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiederstein M, Sippl MJ. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W407–410. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins KR. Computer review of ChemDraw ultra 12.0. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(21):8388–8388. doi: 10.1021/ja204075s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendie LE, Hemalatha S. Molecular docking of phytochemicals targeting GFRs as therapeutic sites for cancer: an in silico study. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2022;194(1):215–231. doi: 10.1007/s12010-021-03791-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):42717. doi: 10.1038/srep42717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires DEV, Blundell TL, Ascher DB. pkCSM: predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. J Med Chem. 2015;58(9):4066–4072. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeni Y, Rachmania RA. The prediction of pharmacokinetic properties of compounds in hemigraphis alternata (burm.F.) T. Ander leaves using pkCSM. Indones J Chem. 2022;22(4):1081–1089. doi: 10.22146/ijc.73117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi P, Ghosh S, Nath Talapatra S. Bioavailability prediction of phytochemicals present in calotropis procera (aiton) R. Br. by using Swiss-ADME tool. World Sci News. 2019;131:147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Jyothi R, et al. Swiss ADME prediction of phytochemicals present in Butea monosperma (lam.) taub. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2020;9:1799–1809.
   Google Scholar
• Daina A, Zoete V. A BOILED-Egg to predict gastrointestinal absorption and brain penetration of small molecules. ChemMedChem. 2016;11(11):1117–1121. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201600182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga RC, Alves VM, Silva MFB, et al. Pred-hERG: a novel web-accessible computational tool for predicting cardiac toxicity. Mol Inform. 2015;34(10):698–701. doi: 10.1002/minf.201500040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danker T, Möller C. Early identification of hERG liability in drug discovery programs by automated patch clamp. Front Pharmacol. 2014;:203. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firdausy AF, Muti’ah R, Rahmawati EK. Predicting pharmacokinetic profiles of sunflower’s (helianthus annuus L.) active compounds using in silico approach. JIM. 2020;4(1):1–7. doi: 10.18860/jim.v4i1.8840.
   Google Scholar
• Azzam KA,. SwissADME and pkCSM webservers predictors: an integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions for in silico ADME/T properties of artemisinin and its derivatives. KIMS/CUMR/MShKP. 2023;11; 325(2):14–21. doi: 10.31643/2023/6445.13.
   Google Scholar
• Pecoraro B, Tutone M, Hoffman E, et al. Predicting skin permeability by means of computational approaches: reliability and caveats in pharmaceutical studies. J Chem Inf Model. 2019;59(5):1759–1771. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psimadas D, Georgoulias P, Valotassiou V, et al. Molecular nanomedicine towards cancer. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101(7):2271–2280.   doi: 10.1002/jps.23146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitcheson JS. hERG potassium channels and the structural basis of drug-induced arrhythmias. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21(5):1005–1010. doi: 10.1021/tx800035b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar