Apophatic theology as a resource for eco-theology

Bibliography

• Aguirre, F. “Theological Apophaticism and Philosophical Nihilism Towards a Theory of Knowledge.” Teología y vida 60, no. 2 (2019): 229–242. doi:10.4067/s0049-34492019000200229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldenhoven, H. “Die Unterscheidung zwischen einer erkennbar-zugänglichen und einer unerkennbar-unzugänglichen Seite in Gott und die Trinitätslehre. Zur Auseinandersetzung westlicher Theologie mit der ostkirchlichen Lehre von den ungeschaffenen Energien Gottes.” In Lex orandi – Lex credendi. Beiträge zur liturgischen und systematischen Theologie in altkatholischer Tradition, edited by U. von Arx with Georgiana Huian and P.-B. Smit, 182–199. Münster: Aschendorff, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, V. D. “The Cosmic Role of the Logos, as Conceived from Heraclitus until Eriugena.” Philosophy and Theology 27, no. 1 (2015): 3–24. doi:10.5840/philtheol20155119.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamins, R. Catherine Keller’s Constructieve Theologie. Vught: Skandalon, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, D. “The Logoi of Beings in Greek Patristic Thought.” In Toward an Ecology of Transfiguration: Orthodox Christian Perspectives on Environment, Nature, and Creation, edited by B. Foltz and J. Chryssavgis, 9–22, Fordham University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, G. V. D. “Social Trinitarianism. A Discussion of Some Recent Theological Criticisms.” International Journal of Systematic Theology 16, no. 3 (2014): 331–350. doi:10.1111/ijst.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chryssavgis, J. “Icons, Liturgy, Saints: Ecological Insights from Orthodox Spirituality.” International Review of Mission 99, no. 2 (2010): 181–189. doi:10.1111/j.1758-6631.2010.00042.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chryssavgis, J., and F. Krueger. “Working with Orthodox Forms of Christianity.” In T&T Clark Handbook of Christian Theology and Climate Change, edited by H. P. Koster and E. M. Conradie, 229–239. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, D. L. On Animals I. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, S. God, Sexuality, and the Self: An Essay “On the Trinity”. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Deane-Drummond, C. The Wisdom of the Liminal: Evolution and Other Animals in Human Becoming. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Enxing, J. “How Far We (Should Not) Have Come. Theological Reflections on ‘HIDDEN. Animals in the Anthropocene.” lecture at the conference “Rethinking Theology in the Anthropocene”, July 15, 2021, https://anthropocene.ts-tr.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Eva van, U.-C. “Created in the Image of God: Both Human and Non-Human Animals?” Theology and Science 19, no. 4 (2021): 343–362. doi:10.1080/14746700.2021.1982248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, D. “Humans Created according to the Imago Dei: An Alternative Proposal.” Zygon® 48, no. 2 (2013): 439–453. doi:10.1111/zygo.12014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. “Introduction.” In Essays on the Trinity, edited by L. Harvey, 1–13. Eugene: Cascade, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Huian, G. “The Human Being as Image of God according to Gregory of Nazianzus.” In Imago Dei, edited by T. Hainthaler, F. Mali, G. Emmenegger, and A. Morozov, 292–306. Innsbruck: Tyrolia, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• In the Image and Likeness of God: A Hope-Filled Anthropology. The Buffalo Statement Agreed by the International Commission for Anglican-Orthodox Theological Dialogue. London: Anglican Communion Office, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Janeras, S. “Introducción a la teología ortodoxa.” In Las Iglesias Orientales, edited by A. G. Montes, 133–254. Madrid: BAC, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, L. Antonius Jan Glazemaker (1931-2018) Aartsbisschop in Een Tijd van Verandering. Utrecht: KokBoekencentrum, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. A. Ask the Beasts: Darwin and the God of Love. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, H.-S. “Tonghak Ecofeminist Epistemology.” Theology Today 71, no. 3 (2014): 310–322. doi:10.1177/0040573614542307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallistos (Ware), Metropolitan. Through Creation to the Creator. In Toward an Ecology of Transfiguration: Orthodox Christian Perspectives on Environment, Nature, and Creation, edited by B. Foltz and J. Chryssavgis, 86–105. Fordham University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C. The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. London: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Louth, A. “Between Creation and Transfiguration: Environment in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition.” In Ecological Hermeneutics, edited by D. G. Horrell, C. Hunt, C. Southgate, and F. Stavrakopoulou, 211–222. London: T&T Clark, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. D. “They Fell Silent When We Stopped Listening: Apophatic Theology and ‘Asking the Beasts.” In Turning to the Heavens and the Earth: Theological Reflections on a Cosmological Conversion, edited by J. Brumbaugh and N. Imperatori-Lee, 26–44. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, M., B. Jickling, and J. Quay. “Rethinking Relationships through Education: Wild Pedagogies in Practice.” Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 21, no. 3 (2018): 241–254. doi:10.1007/s42322-018-0023-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ouspensky, L. La Théologie de l’icône. Paris: Cerf, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Quay, J., and A. Jensen. “Wild Pedagogies and Wilding Pedagogies: Teacher-Student-Nature Centredness and the Challenges for Teaching.” Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 21, no. 3 (2018): 293–305. doi:10.1007/s42322-018-0022-9.
   Google Scholar
• Robinette, B. “The Difference Nothing Makes: Creatio Ex Nihilo, Resurrection, and Divine Gratuity.” Theological Studies 73, no. 3 (2011): 525–557. doi:10.1177/004056391107200303.
   Google Scholar
• Sarot, M. “Suffering of Christ, Suffering of God?” Theology 95, no. 764 (1992): 113–119. doi:10.1177/0040571X9209500207.
   Google Scholar
• Scheidler, F. Der Stoff, aus dem wir sind: Warum wir Natur und Gesellschaft neu denken müssen. München: Piper Verlag GmbH, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, P.-B. “Was hat die Dreifaltigkeit mit Politik zu tun? Zum öffentlich-theologischen Potential altkatholischer Theologie.” Internationale Kirchliche Zeitschrift 110 (2020): 60–88.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. “Producing Sense, Consuming Sense, Making Sense: Perils and Prospects for Sensory History.” Journal of Social History 40, no. 4 (2007): 841–858. doi:10.1353/jsh.2007.0116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theokritoff, E. Living in God’s Creation. Orthodox Perspectives on Ecology. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Trees van, M. Groene Theologie. Middelburg: Skandalon, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Trees van, M. Green Theology. An Eco-Feminist and Ecumenical Perspective. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, C. Ruiken aan de tijd. De olfactorische dimensie van het futurisme (1909 – 1942). PhD dissertation; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. Christ. The Heart of Creation. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. Looking East in Winter. Contemporary Thought and the Eastern Christian Tradition. London: Bloomsbury, 2021a.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. Understanding and Misunderstanding ‘Negative Theology’. Milwaukee: Marquette University, 2021b.
   Google Scholar
• Yannaras, C. On the Absence and Unknowability of God. Heidegger and Areopagite. London: T&T Clark, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yannaras, C. “Ontologia tis schesis.” In Athens: Ikaros, 2004 English Translation by Norman Russell: Relational Ontology. Brookline: Holy Cross. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zizioulas, J. Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. Crestwood: St Vladimir’s Seminary, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Zizioulas, J. Communion & Otherness: Further Studies in Personhood and the Church. London: T&T Clark, 2007.
   Google Scholar