Forum: resilience & design

References

• Alexander, C. (1971). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amatullo, M. V. (2015). Innovation by design at UNICEF: An ethnographic case study. UNICEF Office of Innovation. Retrieved from https://unicefstories.org/about/reportsandbrochures/
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, P. (2012). Vital design. Foreword. In W. Myers (Ed.), Bio design: Nature, science, creativity (pp. 6–7). London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Bahadur, A., & Tanner, T. (2014). Transformational resilience thinking: Putting people, power and politics at the heart of urban climate resilience. Environment and Urbanization, 26, 200–214. doi:10.1177/0956247814522154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Resilient communities: Sustainabilities in transition. Local Environment, 17, 525–532. doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.676637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2014). Design for policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, E. (2013). Design as activism in Helsinki. Design and Culture, 5, 195–214. doi:10.2752/175470813X13638640370779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, T., Brandt, E., Ehn, P., & Halse, J. (2015). Democratic design experiments: Between parliament and laboratory. CoDesign, 11, 152–165. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehnert, J. (2014). Design vs. the design industry. Design Philosophy Papers, 12, 119–136. doi:10.2752/144871314X14159818597513
   Google Scholar
• Boland, R. J., & Collopy, F. (Eds.). (2004). Managing as designing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, G. (1999). Interface: An approach to design. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Akademie.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8, 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2014). Beyond neoliberalism: Resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 2, 47–63. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   Google Scholar
• Cretney, R., & Bond, S. (2014). ‘Bouncing back’ to capitalism? Grass-roots autonomous activism in shaping discourses of resilience and transformation following disaster. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 2, 18–31. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.872449
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 299–333. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22, 4–17. doi:10.1162/desi.2006.22.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2017). Response: Design for/by [and from] the ‘global South’. Design Philosophy Papers, 15, 39–49. doi:10.1080/14487136.2017.1301016
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B., & Reid, J. (2014). Resilient life: The art of living dangerously. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 223–237. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, F., Borba, G., & Drebold, L. (2011). Participatory design as an approach to social innovation. Design Philosophy Papers, 9, 235–250. doi:10.2752/144871311X13968752924950
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Jain, S., & Tuertscher, P. (2008). Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organization Studies, 29, 351–371. doi:10.1177/0170840607088018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackney, F. (2013). Quiet activism and the new amateur. Design and Culture, 5, 169–193. doi:10.2752/175470813X13638640370733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldrup, S. V., & Rosén, F. (2013). Developing resilience: A retreat from grand planning. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 1, 130–145. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.804659
   Google Scholar
• Hartwich, O. (2009). Neoliberalism: The genesis of a political swearword (CIS Occasional Paper 114). St Leonards, NSW: Centre for Independent Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ort.edu.uy/facs/boletininternacionales/contenidos/68/neoliberalism68.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Helfand, J. (2016). Design: The invention of desire. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: A Proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7, 229–246. doi:10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (2015). Facilitating collaborative problem solving with human-centred design: The making all voices count governance programme in 12 countries of Africa and Asia. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 11, 91–106. Retrieved from https://journal.km4dev.org/index.php/km4dj/article/viewFile/197/351
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 1, 38–52. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. (2013). From design culture to design activism. Design and Culture, 5, 215–236. doi:10.2752/175470813X13638640370814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiern, M. (2011). Designing the social, and the politics of social innovation. Design Philosophy Papers, 9, 207–216. doi:10.2752/144871311X13968752924879
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3, 285–306. doi:10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2011). A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk. In W. Schinkel, & L. Noordegraaf-Eelens (Eds.), In Medias Res: Peter Sloterdijk’s spherological poetics of being (pp. 151–164). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think: The design process demystified. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997). Limits of steering. Theory, Culture & Society, 14, 41–57. doi:10.1177/026327697014001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2013). From resilience to resourcefulness. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 253–270. doi:10.1177/0309132512454775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2013). Making things happen: Social innovation and design. Design Issues, 30, 57–66. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. (2007). Design, the future and the human spirit. Design Issues, 23, 4–15. doi:10.1162/desi.2007.23.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles, G. (2008). New pragmatism and the vocabulary and metaphors of scholarly design research. Design Issues, 24, 88–101. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.4.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822384151
   Google Scholar
• Myers, W. (2012). Bio design: Nature science creativity. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, C. (2001). Structured planning in design: Information-age tools for product development. Design Issues, 17, 27–43. doi:10.1162/07479360152103813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinder, D. (2005). Visions of the city: Utopianism, power and politics in twentieth-century urbanism. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., & Davoudi, S. (2012). The politics of resilience for planning: A cautionary note. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 329–333. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (2000). Change, complexity, and governance in a globalizing space. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy (pp. 167–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Tate, L. (2016). Exploring the influence of ANT. In Y. Rydin, & L. Tate (Eds.), Actor networks of planning: Exploring the influence of actor network theory (pp. 3–24). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4, 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Secomandi, F., & Snelders, D. (2012). Interface design in services: A postphenomenological approach. Design Issues, 29, 3–13. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1996). Sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., & Randalls, S. (2016). Geography, ontological politics and the resilient future. Dialogues in Human Geography, 6, 3–18. doi:10.1177/2043820615624047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29, 16–28. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, C., & Tait, M. (2007). The crisis of trust and planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 8, 229–247. doi:10.1080/14649350701324458
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., & Verschraegen, G. (2008). The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory, 7, 263–283. doi:10.1177/1473095208094824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42, 143–160. doi:10.1177/0967010611399616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. (2014). Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal, 180, 15–26. doi:10.1111/geoj.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, T. (2015). Design for Dasein: Understanding the design of experiences. Thomas Wendt. ISBN: 978-1506166537.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, A.-M. (2006). Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers, 4, 69–92. doi:10.2752/144871306X13966268131514
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. (2009). Making the social hold: Towards an actor-network theory of design. Design and Culture, 1, 273–288. doi:10.1080/17547075.2009.11643291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2012). Changing cities. In M. Butcher, N. Clark, J. Smith, & R. Tyszczuk (Eds.), Atlas: Geography, architecture and change in an interdependent world (pp. 72–79). London: Black Dog.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., & Bridge, G. (2017). The situations of urban inquiry: Thinking problematically about the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C., & Parnell, S. (2016). Ideas, implementation and indicators: Epistemologies of the post-2015 urban agenda. Environment and Urbanization, 28, 87–98. doi:10.1177/0956247815621473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., & Cowley, R. (2016). Interrogating urban experiments. Urban Geography. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1265870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., Cowley, R., Datta, A., Castán Broto, V., Gao, E., Georgeson, L., … Joss, S. (2017). The New Urban Agenda: Key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice. Urban Research & Practice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17535069.2016.1275618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colls, R., & Evans, B. (2014). Making space for fat bodies? A critical account of ‘the obesogenic environment’. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 733–753. doi:10.1177/0309132513500373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2006). Policy analysis as critical listening. In M. Moran, M. Reid, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 125–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R. (2015). Smart cities: Moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 79–92. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, I., & Buck, N. (2005). Introduction: Cities in the new conventional wisdom. In N. Buck, I. Gordon, A. Harding, & I. Turok (Eds.), Changing cities: Rethinking urban competitiveness, cohesion and governance (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2010). The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2006). Spatial rationalities: Order, environment, evolution and government. Social and Cultural Geography, 7, 771–787. doi:10.1080/14649360600974758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., & van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: Experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 379–392. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGranahan, G., & Satterthwaite, D. (2014). Urbanisation concepts and trends (IIED Working Paper). London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. J. (2014). The rise of metropolitics: Urban governance in the age of the city-region. In N. Bradford, & A. Bramwell (Eds.), Governing urban economies: Innovation and inclusion in Canadian city-regions (pp. 297–318). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parnell, S. (2016). Defining a global urban development agenda. World Development, 78, 529–570. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swilling, M., & Annecke, E. (2012). Just transitions: Exploring sustainability in an unfair world. Cape Town: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. (2015). Cities of data: Examining the new urban science. Public Culture, 27, 201–212. doi:10.1215/08992363-2841808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner, M., & Campbell, S. (2015). Planning for deep-rooted problems: What can we learn from aligning complex systems and wicked problems? Planning Theory and Practice, 16, 457–478. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1084360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehnert, J. (2014). Design vs. the design industry. Design Philosophy Papers, 12, 119–136. doi:10.2752/144871314X14159818597513
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of difference: Place, movement, life, redes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822389439
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. M. (2016). This is what happens when. In J. M. Canty (Ed.), Ecological and social healing – Multicultural women’s voices (pp. 3–11). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2010). When Species Meet: Staying with the Trouble. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 53–55. doi:10.1068/d2706wsh
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165. doi:10.1215/22011919-3615934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S. (2006). Networking people and nature in the city – inspiration, issues and challenges (Leaflet). Cape Town: Cape Flats Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 1, 38–52. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Google Scholar
• Katzschner, T. (2013). Cape Flats Nature: Rethinking urban ecologies. In L. Green (Ed.), Contested ecologies: Dialogues in the south on nature and knowledge (pp. 202–226). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppen, E., & Meinel, C. (2012). Knowing people: The empathetic designer. Design Philosophy Papers, 10, 35–51. doi:10.2752/089279312X13968781797553
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (Ed.). (2016). Reset Modernity! Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, T. (2013). Ordinary magic: The alchemy of biodiversity and development in cape flats nature. Solutions for a sustainable and desirable future, 4, 84–92. Retrieved from https://www.thesolutionsjournal.com
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs – An introduction to design for social innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, M., & Rogers, P. (2017). Looking at emergent and multi-scale governance through the lens of community formation. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/21693293.2017.1306157
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, B., & Boulle, T. (2010). Growing together: Thinking and practice of urban nature conservators. Cape Town: Cape Flats Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J., & van Houtum, H. (2002). Post-colonial nature conservation in Southern Africa: Same emperors, new clothes? GeoJournal, 58, 253–263.10.1023/B:GEJO.0000017956.82651.41
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Whose environment? The end of nature, climate change and the process of post-politicization. Ambiente & Sociedade, 14, 69–87. doi:10.1590/S1414-753X2011000200006
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400873548
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez, R. (2017). Precedence, earth and the anthropocene: Decolonizing design. Design Philosophy Papers, 15, 77–91. doi:10.1080/14487136.2017.1303130
   Google Scholar
• Vilcan, T. (2017). Articulating resilience in practice: Chains of responsibilisation, failure points and political contestation. Resilience: International Policies. Practices and Discourses, 5, 29–43. doi:10.1080/21693293.2016.1228157
   Google Scholar
• Zebrowski, C. (2009). Governing the network society: A biopolitical critique of resilience. Political Perspectives, 3, 38. Retrieved from https://www.politicalperspectives.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Benz, P. (Ed.). (2014). Experience design: Concepts and case studies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çalişkan, K. (2010). Market threads: How cotton farmers and traders create a global commodity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelle, M. (2013). Relational and non-relational models in the entextualization of bureaucracy. Computational Culture, 3. Retrieved from https://computationalculture.net/article/relational-and-non-relational-models-in-the-entextualization-of-bureaucracy
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2014). Beyond neoliberalism: Resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience, 2, 47–63. doi:10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   Google Scholar
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. (G. Elliott, Trans.). London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2016). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2
   Google Scholar
• Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. Washington, DC: Summary Report for Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Retrieved from https://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.html
   Google Scholar
• Few, S. (2013). Information dashboard design. Burlingame, CA: Analytics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. (A. I. Davidson, Ed., G. Burchell, Trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2016). Program earth: Environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816693122.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, J. J. (2010). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web and beyond. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2014). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (Ed.). (2015). The road from mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective, with a new preface. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nake, F. (1994). Human-computer interaction – Signs and signals interfacing. Languages of Design, 2, 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (2010). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2006). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808418
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience. Security Dialogue, 42, 143–160. doi:10.1177/0967010611399616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Boeck, F. (2011). Inhabiting ocular ground: Kinshasa’s future in the light of Congo’s spectral urban politics. Cultural Anthropology, 26, 263–286. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01099.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boeck, F., & Baloji, S. (2016). Suturing the city. Living together in Congo’s urban worlds. London: Autograph ABP.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, N. R. (2007). Suturing new medical histories of Africa. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Labou Tansi, S. (1998). Théatre 3. Monologue d’or et noces d’argent / Le trou [Theatre 3. Golden Monologue and Silver Wedding]. Carnières-Morlanwelz: Lansman Editeur.
   Google Scholar
• Mavinga Tsafunenga, A. (2011). Cimetière de vivants. Poèmes [Cemetery of the Living. Poems]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.-A. (1966/2012). Suture (Elements of the logic of the signifier). In: P. Hallward, & K. Peden (Eds.), Concept and form. Volume one. Key texts from the Cahiers pour l’Analyse (pp. 91–101). London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nzeza Bilakila, A. (2004). The Kinshasa bargain. In T. Trefon (Ed.), Reinventing order in the Congo: How People respond to state failure in Kinshasa (pp. 20–32). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pandian, A. (2014). Thinking like a mountain. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4, 242–252. doi:10.14318/hau4.2.012
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. (2014). The ends of extraction: Diamonds, value, and reproduction in democratic republic of Congo (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Weizman, E. (2012). Hollow land. Israel’s architecture of occupation. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar