158
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The effects of auditory training on dichotic listening: a neurological case study

&

References

  • Castro-Caldas A, Botelho AMS. Dichotic listening in the recovery of aphasia after stroke. Brain Lang. 1980;10:145–151.
  • Divenyi P, Robinson A. Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia. Brain Lang. 1989;37:290–326.
  • Hough M, Downs R, Cranford J, et al. Measures of auditory processing in aphasia: behavioral and electrophysiological analyses. Aphasiology. 2003;17:159–172.
  • Kimura D. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol. 1961;15:156–165.
  • Rankin E, Newton C, Parker C. Hearing loss and auditory processing in people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2014;28:576–595.
  • Sparks R, Goodglass H, Nickel B. Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex. 1970;6:249–260.
  • Chermak GD, Tucker E, Seikel JA. Behavioral characteristics of auditory processing disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: predominantly inattentive type. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13:332–338.
  • Niccum N, Rubens A, Selnes O. Dichotic listening performance, language impairment, and lesion location in aphasic listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1983;26:42–49.
  • Niccum N, Rubens A, Speaks C. Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of aphasic patients. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1981;24:526–534.
  • Niccum N, Speaks C, Rubens A, et al. Longitudinal dichotic listening patterns for aphasic patients: II. Relationship with lesion variables. Brain Lang. 1986;28:289–302.
  • Bouma A, Ansink B. Different mechanisms of ipsilateral and contralateral ear extinction in aphasic patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988;10:709–726.
  • Baran J, Shinn J, Musiek F. New developments in the assessment and management of auditory processing disorders. Audiol Med. 2006;4:35–45.
  • Musiek F, Wilson D, Pinheiro M. Audiological manifestations in “split brain patients”. J Am Aud Soc. 1979;5:25–29.
  • Musiek F, Weihing J, Lau C. Dichotic interaural intensity difference (DIID). J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 2008;41:51–65.
  • Moncrieff D, Wertz D. Auditory rehabilitation for interaural asymmetry: preliminary evidence of improved dichotic listening performance following intensive training. Int J Audiol. 2008;47:84–97.
  • Soveri A, Tallus J, Laine M, et al. Modulation of auditory attention by training: evidence from dichotic listening. Exp Psychol. 2013;60:44–52.
  • Weihing J, Chermak G, Musiek F. Auditory training for central auditory processing disorder. Semin Hear. 2015;36:199–215.
  • Millward KE, Hall RL, Ferguson MA, et al. Training speech-in-noise perception in mainstream school children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75:1408–1417.
  • Halliday LF, Moore DR, Taylor JL, et al. Dimension-specific attention directs learning and listening on auditory training tasks. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011;73:1329–1335.
  • Halliday LF, Taylor JL, Millward KE, et al. Lack of generalization of auditory learning in typically developing children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:168–181.
  • Krishnamurti S, Forrester J, Rutledge C, et al. A case study of the changes in the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response associated with auditory training in children with auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:594–604.
  • Smith GE, Housen P, Yaffe K, et al. A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the improvement in memory with plasticity-based adaptive cognitive training (IMPACT) study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:594–603.
  • Repp BH. Identification of dichotic fusions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1976;60:456–469.
  • Shinn J, Baran J, Moncrieff D, et al. Differential attention effects on dichotic listening. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:205–218.
  • Putter-Katz H, Adi-Bensaid L, Feldman I, et al. Effects of speech-in-noise and dichotic listening intervention programs on central auditory processing disorders. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;19:301–316.
  • Wilson R. Development of a speech-in-multitalker babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14:453–470.
  • Wilson R, Burks C. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: a clinical protocol. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:839–852.
  • Musiek F. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the Dichotic Digit Test revisited. Ear Hear. 1983;4:79–83.
  • Musiek F, Kurdziel-Schwan S, Kibbe K, et al. The Dichotic Rhyme task: results in split-brain patients. Ear Hear. 1989;10:33–39.
  • Wexler B, Halwes T. Increasing the power of dichotic methods: the fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia. 1983;21:59–66.
  • Pinheiro M, Ptacek P. Reversals in the perception of noise and tone patterns. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971;49:1778–1782.
  • Musiek F. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994;5:265–268.
  • Hurley A, Davis DB, Constraint induced auditory training. St. Louis (MO): Auditec, Inc.; 2011.
  • Musiek F, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders: a case study. Semin Hear. 1998;19:357–365.
  • Humes LE, Kinney DL, Brown SE, et al. The effects of dosage and duration of auditory training for older adults with hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;136:EL224–EL230.
  • Tallus J, Soveri A, Hämäläinen H, et al. Effects of auditory attention training with the dichotic listening task: behavioural and neurophysiological evidence. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139318.
  • Andersson M, Reinvang I, Wehling E, et al. A dichotic listening study of attention control in older adults. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49:299–304.
  • Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Eichele T. Age effects in dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: interactions with attention. Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;20:445–457.
  • Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, et al. Attention and cognitive control: unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50:11–22.
  • Takio F, Koivisto M, Jokiranta L, et al. The effect of age on attentional modulation in dichotic listening. Dev Neuropsychol. 2009;34:225–239.
  • Cherney L, Kaye R, van Vuuren S. Acquisition and maintenance of scripts in aphasia: a comparison of two cuing conditions. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23:S343–S360.
  • Tuomiranta L, Rautakoski R, Rinne J, et al. Long term maintenance of novel vocabulary in persons with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26:1053–1073.
  • Anderson S, Kraus N. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: a review. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21:575–585.
  • Besser J, Koelewijn T, Zekveld A, et al. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise-a review. Trends Amplif. 2013;17:75–93.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.