References
- Schoepflin JR. Back to basics speech audiometry [Internet]. 2012 July 30 [cited 2016 Oct 6]. Available from: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/back-to-basics-speech-audiometry-6828
- Dias MA, Devadas U, Rajashekar B. Development of speech audiometry material in Goan Konkani Language Marissa. Lang India. 2015;15:268–280.
- Lawson GD, Peterson ME. Speech audiometry. San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing; 2011.
- Ramachandra P. High Frequency Speech Identification Test for Hindi and Urdu speakers [unpublished Masters dissertation]. Bangalore: University of Bangalore; 2001.
- Kavitha EM. High Frequency-Kannada Speech Identification Test (HF-KST) [unpublished Masters dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2002.
- Sudipta KB. High Frequency-English Speech Identification Test (HF-ESIT) [unpublished Masters dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2006.
- Sinthiya KM. High Frequency Speech Identification Test in Tamil [unpublished Masters dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2009.
- Ratnakar YV. High Frequency Speech Identification Test in Telugu [unpublished Masters dissertation]. Mysore: University of Mysore; 2010.
- Turner CW, Brus SL. Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;109:2999–3006.
- Brown CA, Bacon SP. Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125:1658–1665.
- Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130:2054–2062.
- Jin S, Nelson P. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;128:881–889.
- Avilala VKY, Prabhu P, Barman A. The effect of filtered speech on speech identification scores of young normal hearing adults. J All India Inst Speech Hear. 2010;29:115–119.
- Bornstein SP, Wilson RH, Cambron NK. Low- and high-pass filtered Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 for monaural and binaural evaluation. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994;5:259–264.
- Frenzel LE. Communication electronics: principles and applications. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill; 2001.
- MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967. Vol. 1. p. 281–297.
- Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA. 1981;23:493–500.
- Yathiraj A, Vijayalakshmi CS. Phonemically balanced word list in Kannada. Mysore: Department of Audiology, AIISH; 2005.
- Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:2412–2421.
- Hirsh IJ, Davis H, Silverman SR, et al. Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord. 1952;17:321–337.
- Tillman T, Jerger J. Some factors affecting the spondee threshold in normal-hearing subjects. J Speech Hear Res. 1959;2:141–146.
- Ratcliff ER. Psychometrically equivalent bisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Arabic [dissertation]. Provo: Brigham Young University; 2006.
- Tobias VJ. On phonemic analysis of speech discrimination tests. J Speech Hear Res. 1964;7:98–100.
- Bess FH. Clinical assessment of speech recognition. In: Konkle DF, Rintlemann WF, editors. Principles of speech audiometry. Baltimore: University Park press; 1893. p. 127–201.
- Manjula P, Antony J, Kumar KSS, et al. Development of phonemically balanced word lists for adults in the Kannada language. J Hear Sci. 2015;5:22–30.