References
- Holt LL, Lotto AJ. Speech perception as categorization. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010;72:1218–1227. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921848/
- Howell P. Effect of speaking environment on speech production and perception. Jhes. 2008;11:51–57. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024543/
- Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality. Ear Hear. 2010;31:420–436.
- Klatte M, Lachmann T, Meis M. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting. Noise Health. 2010;12:270–282.
- Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2013;52:433–441. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.776181
- Teschner MJ, Seybold BA, Malone BJ, et al. Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on auditory cortical frequency processing. J Neurosci. 2016;36:2743–2756. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/9/2743
- Xu L, Pfingst BE. Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception (L). J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114:3024–3027. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283139/
- Moore BC. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. Jaro. 2008;9:399–406. [Internet]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10162-008-0143-x
- Hopkins K, Moore BCJ. The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010;127:1595–1608.
- Cooke M. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:1562–1573. [Internet]. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/119/3/10.1121/1.2166600
- Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Flanagan HJ, et al. Frequency discrimination of complex tones; assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:480–490.
- Fogerty D, Entwistle JL. Level considerations for chimeric processing: temporal envelope and fine structure contributions to speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;138:e459–e464. [Internet]. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/138/5/10.1121/1.4935079
- Eaves JM, Kitterick PT, Summerfield AQ. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130:501–507. [Internet]. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/130/1/10.1121/1.3592237
- Leger AC, Desloge JG, Braida LD, et al. The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;137:505–508. [Internet]. Available from: https://asa.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1121/1.4904540
- Ghitza O. On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:1628–1640.
- Swaminathan J, Mason CR, Streeter TM, et al. Role of binaural temporal fine structure and envelope cues in cocktail-party listening. J Neurosci. 2016;36:8250–8257. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4421-15.2016
- Chen F, Tsao Y, Lai Y-H. Modeling speech intelligibility with recovered envelope from temporal fine structure stimulus. Speech Commun. 2016;81:120–128. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639316000297
- Füllgrabe C. Age-dependent changes in temporal-fine-structure processing in the absence of peripheral hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2013;22:313–315.
- Schneider BA, Pichora-Fuller MK. Age-related changes in temporal processing: implications for speech perception. Semin Hear. 2001;22:227–240. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2001-15628
- Lorenzi C, Gilbert G, Carn H, et al. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18866–18869.
- Jerger J, Jerger S. A simplified tone decay test. Arch Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 1975;101:403–407. [Internet]. Available from: http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=605807
- Geetha C, Kumar KSS, Manjula P, et al. Development and standardisation of the sentence identification test in the Kannada language. J Hear Sci. 2014;4:18–26. Available from: http://www.journalofhearingscience.com/download/index/idArt/890267
- Delgutte B. ChimeraSoftware.rar psd_matched_noise.m [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2018 Jun 12]. Available from: http://read.pudn.com/downloads161/sourcecode/speech/726306/psd_matched_noise.m__.htm
- The MathWorks Inc. Signal-to-noise ratio - MATLAB snr - MathWorks India [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 17]. Available from: http://in.mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/snr.html
- The MathWorks Inc. Butterworth filter order and cutoff frequency - MATLAB buttord - MathWorks India [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 17]. Available from: http://in.mathworks.com/help/signal/ref/buttord.html
- Ananthakrishnan S, Luo X, Krishnan A. Human frequency following responses to vocoded speech. Ear Hear. 2017;38:e256–e267.
- Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;87:2592–2605.
- Nie K, Stickney G, Zeng F-G. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005;52:64–73.
- Hillenbrand JM, Gayvert RT. Open source software for experiment design and control. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005;48:45–60.
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
- Apoux F, Yoho SE, Youngdahl CL, et al. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134:2205–2212. [Internet]. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/134/3/10.1121/1.4816413
- Hopkins K, Moore BC. The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125:442–446. [Internet]. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/125/1/10.1121/1.3037233
- Sek A, Moore BCJ. Perception of amplitude modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: the audibility of component modulation and detection of phase change in three-component modulators. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:507–514.
- Kale S, Heinz MG. Envelope coding in auditory nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss. JARO. 2010;11:657–673. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10162-010-0223-6
- Shamma S, Klein D. The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;107:2631–2644. Available from: http://scitation.aip.org/content/asa/journal/jasa/107/5/10.1121/1.428649
- Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4:279–282. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444174/