ABR findings in musicians with normal audiogram and otoacoustic emissions: evidence of cochlear synaptopathy?

References

• Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci. 2011;31(38):13452–13457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci. 2009;29(45):14077–14085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman MC, Kujawa SG. Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: manifestations and mechanisms. Hear Res. 2017;349:138–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickox AE, Larsen E, Heinz MG, et al. Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy. Hear Res. 2017;349:164–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose JH, Buss E, Hall JW 3rd. Loud music exposure and cochlear synaptopathy in young adults: isolated auditory brainstem response effects but no perceptual consequences. Trends Hear. 2017;21. DOI:10.1177/2331216517737417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4 Suppl. 2):9–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cima RFF, Mazurek B, Haider H, et al. A multidisciplinary European guideline for tinnitus: diagnostics, assessment, and treatment. HNO. 2019;67(Suppl. 1):10–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, et al. Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehraei G, Hickox AE, Bharadwaj HM, et al. Auditory brainstem response latency in noise as a marker of cochlear synaptopathy. J Neurosci. 2016;36(13):3755–3764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim HJ, An YH, Kim DH, et al. Comparisons of auditory brainstem response and sound level tolerance in tinnitus ears and non-tinnitus ears in unilateral tinnitus patients with normal audiograms. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbee CM, James JA, Park JH, et al. Effectiveness of auditory measures for detecting hidden hearing loss and/or cochlear synaptopathy: a systematic review. Semin Hear. 2018;39(2):172–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trimmis NS, Papadeas ES, Papadas TA, et al. Speech audiometry: the development of modern Greek word lists for suprathreshold word recognition testing. Mediterr J Otol. 2006;3:117–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos JA, Kristensen SGB, Beck DL. An overview of OAEs and normative data for DPOAEs. Hear Rev. 2013;20(11):30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan AF, Kujawa SG, Hammill T, et al. Temporary and permanent noise-induced threshold shifts: a review of basic and clinical observations. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(8):e271–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramhall N, Beach EF, Epp B, et al. The search for noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in humans: mission impossible? Hear Res. 2019;377:88–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliadou VV, Ptok M, Grech H, et al. European 17 countries consensus endorses more approaches to APD than reported in Wilson 2018. Int J Audiol. 2018;57(5):395–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst S, Shera CA. Relating the variability of tone-burst otoacoustic emission and auditory brainstem response latencies to the underlying cochlear mechanics. AIP Conf Proc. 2015;1703.
   Google Scholar
• Verhulst S, Jagadeesh A, Mauermann M, et al. Individual differences in auditory brainstem response wave characteristics: relations to different aspects of peripheral hearing loss. Trends Hear. 2016;20. DOI:10.1177/2331216516672186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest H, Munro KJ, Prendergast G, et al. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: relation to noise exposure but no evidence for cochlear synaptopathy. Hear Res. 2017;344:265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast G, Guest H, Munro KJ, et al. Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: electrophysiology. Hear Res. 2017;344:68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morata TC. Young people: their noise and music exposures and the risk of hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2007;46:111–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Behar A, Kunov H, et al. Musicians’ noise exposure in orchestra pit. Appl Acoust. 2005;66(8):919–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeling L, Poulsen T. Hearing ability in Danish symphony orchestra musicians. Noise Health. 1999;1(2):43–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigues MA, Freitas MA, Neves MP, et al. Evaluation of the noise exposure of symphonic orchestra musicians. Noise Health. 2014;16(68):40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen EJ, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, et al. Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(2):153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouryaghoub G, Mehrdad R, Pourhosein S. Noise-induced hearing loss among professional musicians. J Occup Health. 2017;59(1):33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stadio A, Dipietro L, Ricci G, et al. Hearing loss, tinnitus, hyperacusis, and diplacusis in professional musicians: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SL, Henrich VC, Mace ST. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(4):309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien I, Ackermann B, Driscoll T. Hearing and hearing conservation practices among Australia’s professional orchestral musicians. Noise Health. 2014;16:189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton TW, Hillyard SA, Krausz HI, et al. Human auditory evoked potentials. I: evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1974;36:179–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall JW. New handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy TK, Borgsmiller P, Cohlan B. Effects of repetition rate, phase, and frequency on the auditory brainstem response in neonates and adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;9(2):134–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyde ML, Stephens SDG, Thornton ARD. Stimulus repetition rate and early brainstem responses. Br J Audiol. 1976;10(2):41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Kobayashi K, Takagi N. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on slow and fast components of auditory brain-stem responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986;65(2):150–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos MA, Munhoz MS, Peixoto MA, et al. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis? Rev laryngol-otologierhinol (Bord). 2004;125(3):151–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman S, Sohmer H, Silver S. The effect of stimulus repetition rate on the diagnostic efficacy of the auditory nerve-brain-stem evoked response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991;78(4):284–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridley CL, Kopun JG, Neely ST, et al. Using thresholds in noise to identify hidden hearing loss in humans. Ear Hear. 2018;39(5):829–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relkin EM, Doucet JR. Recovery from prior stimulation. I: relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons. Hear Res. 1991;55(2):215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relkin EM, Doucet JR, Sterns A. Sterns recovery of the compound action potential following prior stimulation: evidence for a slow component that reflects recovery of low spontaneous-rate auditory neurons. Hear Res. 1995;83(1–2):183–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoe E, Tufts J. Evidence of noise-induced subclinical hearing loss using auditory brainstem responses and objective measures of noise exposure in humans. Hear Res. 2018;361:80–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar