Dichotic listening training following neurological injury in adults: a pilot study

References

• Knecht S, Drager B, Deppe M, et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain. 2000;123(12):2512–2518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho C, Sinotte M, Duffy J. Schuell's stimulation approach to rehabilitation. In Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 403–449.
   Google Scholar
• Brancucci A, Babiloni C, Babiloni F, et al. Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: evidence from magnetoencephalography. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(8):2329–2336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Cerebral dominance for the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol. 1961;15(3):166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallus J, Soveri A, Hämäläinen H, et al. Effects of auditory attention training with the dichotic listening task: behavioural and neurophysiological evidence. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma A, Ansink B. Different mechanisms of ipsilateral and contralateral ear extinction in aphasia patients. J Clin Exper Neuropsychol. 1988;10(6):709–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niccum N, Rubens A, Selnes O. Dichotic listening performance, language impairment, and lesion location in aphasic listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1983;26(1):42–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niccum N, Rubens A, Speaks C. Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of aphasic patients. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1981;24(4):526–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks R, Goodglass H, Nickel B. Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex. 1970;6(3):249–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castro-Caldas A, Botelho A. Dichotic listening in the recovery of aphasia after stroke. Brain Language. 1980;10(1):145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough M, Downs R, Cranford J, et al. Measures of auditory processing in aphasia: behavioral and electrophysiological analyses. Aphasiology. 2003;17(2):159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K, Wester K. Dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry in brain damaged patients. Int J Neurosci. 1992;63(1–2):17–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: the Dichotic Digits test revisited. Ear Hearing. 1983;4(2):79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F, Weihing J, Lau C. Dichotic interaural intensity difference (DIID). J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 2008;41:51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Moncrieff D, Wertz D. Auditory rehabilitation for interaural asymmetry: preliminary evidence of improved dichotic listening performance following intensive training. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(2):84–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh J, Palmer SB. The effects of auditory training on dichotic listening: a neurological case study. Hear Balance Commun. 2017;15(1):30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A, Raffin M. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hearing Res. 1978;21(3):507–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery-revised. San Antonio (TX): Pearson; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F, Kurdziel-Schwan S, Kibbe K, et al. The Dichotic Rhyme task: results in split-brain patients. Ear Hearing. 1989;10(1):33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willeford J. Assessing central auditory behavior in children: A test battery approach. In. Keith R, editor. Central auditory dysfunction. New York (NY): Grune & Stratton; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil MR, Prescott T. Revised Token Test. Austin (TX), ProEd; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley A, Davis DB. Constraint induced auditory training. 2011. St. Louis (MO): Auditec, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders: a case study. Semin Hear. 1998;19(04):357–365.
   Google Scholar
• Odekar A, Hallowell B. Comparison of alternatives to multidimensional scoring in the assessment of language comprehension in aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2005;14(4):337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Reinvang I, Wehling E, et al. A dichotic listening study of attention control in older adults. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49(4):299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Eichele T. Age effects in dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: interactions with attention. Develop Neuropsychol. 2001;20(1):445–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, et al. Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50(1):11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takio F, Koivisto M, Jokiranta L, et al. The effect of age on attentional modulation in dichotic listening. Develop Neuropsychol. 2009;34(3):225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, et al. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neurosci Letters. 2008;431(1):90–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhausen R, Moosmann M, Alho K, et al. Top-down and bottom-up interaction: manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage. Brain Res. 2009;1250:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura D. Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol. 1961;15(3):156–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caplan D, Waters G. Aphasic disorders of syntactic comprehension and working memory capacity. Cognitive Neuropsychol. 1995;2:637–649.
   Google Scholar
• Murray L. Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: presence and relation to language and communication measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21(2):S51–S64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright H, Fergadiotis G. Conceptualising and measuring working memory and its relationship to aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26(3–4):258–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspari I, Parkinson SR, LaPointe LL, et al. Working memory and aphasia. Brain Cognition. 1998;37(2):205–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann N, Gvion A. Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: a dissociation between semantic-syntactic and phonological reactivation. Brain Language. 2003;86(1):23–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Kohen F, Kalinyak-Fliszar M, et al. Effects of working memory load on processing of sounds and meanings of words in aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26(3–4):462–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Reilly J. Short-term/working memory impairments in aphasia: data, models, and their application to aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2012;26(3–4):253–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung J, McNeil M, Pratt S, et al. Verbal working memory and its relationship to sentence-level reading and listening comprehension in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(7–8):1040–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouwens F, de Jong-Hagelstein M, de Lau LML, et al. Severity of aphasia and recovery after treatment in patients with stroke. Aphasiology. 2014;28(10):1168– 1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaki E, Turkstra L. Communication abilities and work re-entry following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2000;14(5):441–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleim J, Jones T. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hearing Res. 2008;51(1):S225–S239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar