Advanced search
Publication Cover
Hearing, Balance and Communication Volume 18, 2020 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
97
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Amplification performance outcome: a self-assessment outcome measure for hearing aid users in Greece

Nikolaos TrimmisDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Patras, Patras, Greece; Correspondence[email protected] [email protected]
,
Nausica ZiavraDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece;
,
Theodoros PapadasDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
&
Stefanos NaxakisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
Pages 105-115 | Published online: 25 Feb 2020

References

  • Cox RM. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client’s point of view. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:90–S96.
  • Goff AE. The use of hearing aid outcome measures in the audiologic treatment of older adults [dissertation]. Columbus (OH): Ohio State University; 2013.
  • Gatehouse S. Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options. Trends Amplif. 2001;5:91–110.
  • Walden BE, Demorest ME, Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1984;27:49–56.
  • Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1988;9:81–85.
  • Cox RM, Gilmore C. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1990;33:343–357.
  • Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults. Ear Hear. 1991;12:355–357.
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16:176–183.
  • Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8:27–43.
  • Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10:80–103.
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41:30–35.
  • Abrams HB, McArdle R, Chisolm TH. From outcomes to evidence: establishing best practices for audiologists. Semin Hear. 2005;26:157–169.
  • Lindley G. Current hearing aid fitting protocols: results from an online survey. Audiol Today. 2006;18:19–22.
  • Kirkwood DH. Survey probes the economic realities of the dispensing business. Hear J. 2006; 59:19–32.
  • Kochkin S, Beck DL, Christensen LA, et al. MarkeTrak VIII: the impact of the hearing healthcare professional on hearing aid user success. Hear Rev. 2010;17:1234.
  • Cox RM, Stephens D, Kramer SE. Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol. 2002;41:3–26.
  • Trimmis N, Papadeas E, Papadas T, et al. Speech audiometry: the development of modern Greek word lists for suprathreshold word recognition testing. Mediterr J Otol. 2006;3:117–126.
  • Trimmis N, Markatos N, Malaperdas K, et al. Development of an audio compact disc for speech audiometry testing. Proceedings of the 8th EFAS Congress: Joint meeting with the 10th Congress of the German Society of Audiology; 2007 Jun 6–9; Heidelberg, Germany. Oldenburg: German Society of Audiology; 2008.
  • Cox RM. Choosing a self-report measure for hearing aid fitting outcomes. Semin Hear. 2005;26:149–156.
  • Humes LE. As outcome measures proliferate, how do you choose which ones to use? Hear J. 2004;57:10–17.
  • Cox RM, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear. 2000;21:106S–115S.
  • Vestergaard DM. Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol. 2006;45:382–392.
  • Taylor B. Changes in hearing aid benefit over time: an evidence-based review. Audiology Online. 2007.
  • Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:217–222.
  • Wong L, Hickson L, McPherson B. Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say? Trends Amplif. 2003;7:117–161.
  • Tsakiropoulou E, Konstantinidis I, Vital I, et al. Hearing aids: quality of life and socio-economic aspects. Hippokratia. 2007;11:183–186.
  • Bentler RA, Kramer SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear. 2000;21:37–49.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.