97
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Amplification performance outcome: a self-assessment outcome measure for hearing aid users in Greece

, , &

References

  • Cox RM. Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client’s point of view. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:90–S96.
  • Goff AE. The use of hearing aid outcome measures in the audiologic treatment of older adults [dissertation]. Columbus (OH): Ohio State University; 2013.
  • Gatehouse S. Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options. Trends Amplif. 2001;5:91–110.
  • Walden BE, Demorest ME, Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1984;27:49–56.
  • Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1988;9:81–85.
  • Cox RM, Gilmore C. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1990;33:343–357.
  • Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, et al. Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults. Ear Hear. 1991;12:355–357.
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16:176–183.
  • Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;8:27–43.
  • Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999;10:80–103.
  • Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41:30–35.
  • Abrams HB, McArdle R, Chisolm TH. From outcomes to evidence: establishing best practices for audiologists. Semin Hear. 2005;26:157–169.
  • Lindley G. Current hearing aid fitting protocols: results from an online survey. Audiol Today. 2006;18:19–22.
  • Kirkwood DH. Survey probes the economic realities of the dispensing business. Hear J. 2006; 59:19–32.
  • Kochkin S, Beck DL, Christensen LA, et al. MarkeTrak VIII: the impact of the hearing healthcare professional on hearing aid user success. Hear Rev. 2010;17:1234.
  • Cox RM, Stephens D, Kramer SE. Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol. 2002;41:3–26.
  • Trimmis N, Papadeas E, Papadas T, et al. Speech audiometry: the development of modern Greek word lists for suprathreshold word recognition testing. Mediterr J Otol. 2006;3:117–126.
  • Trimmis N, Markatos N, Malaperdas K, et al. Development of an audio compact disc for speech audiometry testing. Proceedings of the 8th EFAS Congress: Joint meeting with the 10th Congress of the German Society of Audiology; 2007 Jun 6–9; Heidelberg, Germany. Oldenburg: German Society of Audiology; 2008.
  • Cox RM. Choosing a self-report measure for hearing aid fitting outcomes. Semin Hear. 2005;26:149–156.
  • Humes LE. As outcome measures proliferate, how do you choose which ones to use? Hear J. 2004;57:10–17.
  • Cox RM, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear Hear. 2000;21:106S–115S.
  • Vestergaard DM. Self-report outcome in new hearing-aid users: longitudinal trends and relationships between subjective measures of benefit and satisfaction. Int J Audiol. 2006;45:382–392.
  • Taylor B. Changes in hearing aid benefit over time: an evidence-based review. Audiology Online. 2007.
  • Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:217–222.
  • Wong L, Hickson L, McPherson B. Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say? Trends Amplif. 2003;7:117–161.
  • Tsakiropoulou E, Konstantinidis I, Vital I, et al. Hearing aids: quality of life and socio-economic aspects. Hippokratia. 2007;11:183–186.
  • Bentler RA, Kramer SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear. 2000;21:37–49.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.