Considering the impact of universal newborn hearing screening and early intervention on language outcomes for children with congenital hearing loss

References

• Ewing IR, Ewing AWG. The ascertainment of deafness in infancy and early childhood. J Laryngol Otol. 1944;59(9):309–333.
   Google Scholar
• Downs MP, Sterritt GM. A guide to newborn and infant hearing screening programs. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1967;85:37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Downs MP, Hemenway WG. Report on the hearing screening of 17.000 neonates. Int Audiol. 1969;8(1):72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Meadow KP. Deafness and child development. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• White SJ, White EC. The effects of hearing status of the family and age of intervention on receptive and expressive oral language skills in hearing-impaired infants. In: Levitt H, McGarr N, Geffner D, editors. Development of language and communication skills in hearing children: ASHA monographs 26. Rockville (MD): American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1987. p. 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Geffner D. The development of language in young hearing-impaired children. In: Levitt H, McGarr N, Geffner D, editors. Development of language and communication skills in hearing children: ASHA monographs 26. Rockville (MD): American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1987. p. 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Foster CR, Giddan JJ, Stark J. ACLC: assessment of children’s language comprehension. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Moog J, Geers A. EPIC: a program to accelerate academic progress in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Volta Rev. 1985;87:259–277.
   Google Scholar
• Lee LL. Northwestern syntax screening test: manual. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Moog J, Geers A. 1980. Grammatical analysis of elicited language: complex sentence level. St Louis (MO): Central Institute for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Education of the Deaf (U.S.). Toward equality: education of the deaf. Washington (DC): Commission on Education of the Deaf; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement. 1993;11(1):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 position statement. Pediatrics. 1995;95(1):152–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman ME, Grandori F. Screening for neonatal hearing defects European consensus statement. Eur J Pediatr. 1999;158(2):95–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. 2018 summary of hearing screening among total occurrent births. 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/2018-data/documents/02_2018-HSFS_Screen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australasian Newborn Hearing Screening Committee. Australian Consensus Statement on Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening; 2001. Available from: https://www.newbornhearingscreening.com.au/about-us/australian-consensus-statement/
   Google Scholar
• Leigh G. Changing parameters in deafness and deaf education: greater opportunity but continuing diversity. In: Marschark M, Hauser P, editors. Deaf cognition: foundations and outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 24–51.
   Google Scholar
• Puig T, Municio A, Medà C. Universal neonatal hearing screening versus selective screening as part of the management of childhood deafness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD003731.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, et al. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(16):2000–2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey A, Coulter D, et al. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):1161–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Leigh G, Dillon H. Introduction to the longitudinal outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI) study: background, design, sample characteristics. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(Suppl. 2):S4–S9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching TYC, Dillon H, Marnane V, et al. Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study. Ear Hear. 2013;34(5):535–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman I, Steiner VG, Pond RE. Preschool language scale. 4th ed. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn LM, Dunn DM. Peabody picture vocabulary test. 4th ed. Minneapolis (MN): Pearson Assessments; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd B, Zhu H, Crosbie S, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology. London (UK): Harcourt; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Schrank FA, Mather N, Woodcock RW. Woodcock–Johnson III diagnostic reading battery. Itasca (IL): Riverside Publishing; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D, Naglieri JA. 2006. Wechsler nonverbal scale of ability. San Antonio (TX): The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Hill M. The parent’s evaluation of aural/oral performance of children (PEACH) scale: normative data. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(3):220–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireton H. Child development inventory. Minneapolis (MN): Child Development Review; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiat. 1997;38(5):581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching TYC, Dillon H, Button L, et al. Age at intervention for permanent hearing loss and 5-year language outcomes. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20164274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing.  Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 2007:120:898–921.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar