61
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Individuals practicing meditation have enhanced subcortical auditory processing of speech

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Newberg AB, Iversen J. The neural basis of the complex mental task of meditation: neurotransmitter and neurochemical considerations. Med Hypotheses. 2003;61(2):282–291.
  • Deepeshwar S, Vinchurkar SA, Visweswaraiah NK, et al. Hemodynamic responses on prefrontal cortex related to meditation and attentional task. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8(252):1-13.
  • Saggar M, King BG, Zanesco AP, et al. Intensive training induces longitudinal changes in meditation state-related EEG oscillatory activity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:256.
  • Luders E, Clark K, Narr KL, et al. Enhanced brain connectivity in long-term meditation practitioners. Neuroimage. 2011;57(4):1308–1316.
  • Davidson RJ, Kabat-Zinn J, Schumacher J, et al. Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosom Med. 2003;65(4):564–570.
  • Kumar UA, Sangamanatha AV, Vikas J. Effects of meditation on temporal processing and speech perceptual skills in younger and older adults. J Neurosci. 2013; 2013:1–60.
  • Antonova E, Chadwick P, Kumari V. More meditation, less habituation? The effect of mindfulness practice on the acoustic startle reflex. PLOS One. 2015;10(5):e0123512–15.
  • McEvoy TM, Frumkin LR, Harkins SW. Effects of meditation on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Int J Neurosci. 1980;10(2–3):165–170.
  • Liu G, Cui R, Li G, et al. Changes in brainstem and cortical auditory potentials during Qi-Gong meditation. Am J Chin Med. 1990;18(3–4):95–103.
  • Panjwani U, Selvamurthy W, Singh SH, et al. Effect of Sahaja yoga meditation on auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and visual contrast sensitivity (VCS) in epileptics. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2000;25(1):1–12.
  • Sinha SK, Basavaraj V. Speech evoked auditory brainstem responses: a new tool to study brainstem encoding of speech sounds. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;62(4):395–399.
  • Lazar SW, Kerr CE, Wasserman RH, et al. Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport. 2005;16(17):1893–1897.
  • Parbery-Clark A, Anderson S, Hittner E, et al. Musical experience offsets age-related delays in neural timing. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;3:1483–14e1.
  • Prabhu P, Banerjee N, Anil A, et al. Role of sex hormones produced during menstrual cycle on brainstem encoding of speech stimulus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(11):3647–3645.
  • Reavley N, Pallant JF. Development of a scale to assess the meditation experience. Pers Individ Differ. 2009;47(6):547–552.
  • Frank T, Durrant JD, Lovrinic JM. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. Am J Aud. 1993;2:3–7.
  • Carhart R, Jerger J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord. 1959;24(4):330–345.
  • Klatt H. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acous Soc Am. 1980;67(3):971–995.
  • Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG, et al. Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(5):758–767.
  • Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, et al. Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(9):2021–2030.
  • Neupane AK, Gururaj K, Mehta G, et al. Effect of repetition rate on speech evoked auditory brainstem response in younger and middle aged individuals. Audiol Res. 2014;4(1):106–107.
  • Kang DH, Jo HJ, Jung WH, et al. The effect of meditation on brain structure: cortical thickness mapping and diffusion tensor imaging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013;8(1):27–33.
  • Kraus N, Nicol T. Aggregate neural responses to speech sounds in the central auditory system. Speech Commun. 2003;41(1):35–47.
  • Akhoun I, Moulin A, Jeanvoine A, et al. Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status: an experimental parametric study. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;175(2):196–205.
  • Krizman J, Skoe E, Kraus N. Clinical neurophysiology sex differences in auditory subcortical function. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(3):590–597.
  • Johnson KL, Nicol TG, Kraus N. Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing. Ear Hear. 2005;26(5):424–434.
  • Vander Werff KR, Burns KS. Brain stem responses to speech in younger and older adults. Ear Hear. 2011;32(2):168–180.
  • Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, et al. Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci. 2012;32(41):14156–14164.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.