References
- Meyer N. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria; 2014.
- Xu H, Liang F-y, Chen L, et al. Evaluation of the utricular and saccular function using oVEMPs and cVEMPs in BPPV patients. J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2016;45(1):1–6.
- Kumar L, Thakar A, Thakur B, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical and laboratory otolith function tests. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(9):e378–e383.
- Michelson PL, McCaslin DL, Jacobson GP, et al. Assessment of subjective visual vertical (SVV) using the “Bucket Test and the Virtual SVV System. Am J Audiol. 2018;27(3):249–259.
- Lejeune L, Thouvarecq R, Anderson DJ, et al. Kinaesthetic and visual perceptions of orientations. Perception. 2009;38(7):988–1001.
- Byun JY, Hong SM, Yeo SG, et al. Role of subjective visual vertical test during eccentric rotation in the recovery phase of vestibular neuritis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010;37(5):565–569.
- Guardia D, Cottencin O, Thomas P, et al. Spatial orientation constancy is impaired in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res. 2012;195(1–2):56–59.
- Collewijn H, Van der Steen J, Ferman L, et al. Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings. Exp Brain Res. 1985;59(1):185–196.
- De Vrijer M, Medendorp W, Van Gisbergen J. Accuracy-precision trade-off in visual orientation constancy. J Vis. 2009;9(2):9–9.
- Kheradmand A, Gonzalez G, Otero-Millan J, et al. Visual perception of upright: head tilt, visual errors and viewing eye. J Vestib Res. 2016;25(5–6):201–209.
- Tarnutzer AA, Bockisch CJ, Straumann D. Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll. Exp Brain Res. 2009;195(4):621–626.
- Bergenius J, Tribukait A, Brantberg K. The subjective horizontal at different angles of roll-tilt in patients with unilateral vestibular impairment. Brain Res Bull. 1996;40(5–6):385–390.
- Brandt T, Dieterich M, Danek A. Vestibular cortex lesions affect the perception of verticality. Ann Neurol. 1994;35(4):403–412.
- Funk J, Finke K, Müller HJ, et al. Effects of lateral head inclination on multimodal spatial orientation judgments in neglect: evidence for impaired spatial orientation constancy. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(6):1616–1627.
- Funk J, Finke K, Müller H, et al. Visual context modulates the subjective vertical in neglect: evidence for an increased rod-and-frame-effect. Neuroscience. 2011;173:124–134.
- Barra J, Marquer A, Joassin R, et al. Humans use internal models to construct and update a sense of verticality. Brain. 2010;133(12):3552–3563.
- Van Beuzekom A, Van Gisbergen J. Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(1):11–27.
- Kim TS, Kim MJ, Kim BK, et al. Laboratory management status of vestibular function test in korea. Res Vestib Sci. 2018;17(4):160–166.
- Wade SW, Curthoys IS. The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli. Vision Res. 1997;37(8):1071–1078.
- Van Beuzekom A, Medendorp W, Van Gisbergen J. The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt. Vision Res. 2001;41(25–26):3229–3242.
- Tarnutzer AA, Bockisch C, Straumann D, et al. Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102(3):1657–1671.
- Ashish G, Augustine AM, Tyagi AK, et al. Subjective visual vertical and horizontal: Normative values using a software-based test in the Indian population. Indian J Otol. 2016;22(3):208.