Deep band modulation, frequency discrimination, temporal resolution and audibility effects: phrase perception with and without hearing impairment among older adults

References

• Jenstad LM, Souza PE. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(5):1123–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers MS, Humes LE. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;93(5):2903–2914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(6):1276–1285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon HJ, Yund EW. Frequency discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing. Ear Hear. 1993;14(3):190–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman RL, Nelson DA. Frequency discrimination as a function of signal frequency and level in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired listeners. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34(6):1371–1386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner CW, Zeng F, Relkin EM, et al. Frequency discrimination in forward and backward masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992;92(6):3102–3108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apoux F, Tribut N, Debruille X, et al. Identification of envelope-expanded sentences in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res. 2004;189(1-2):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya A, Zeng F-G. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122(2):1079–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narne VK, Vanaja CS. Perception of envelope-enhanced speech in the presence of noise by individuals with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear. 2009;30(1):136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narne VK, Barman A, Deepthi M. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD. Int J Audiol. 2013;53(2):94–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan SS, Wang X, Merzenich MM, et al. Speech modifications algorithms used for training language learning- impaired children. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6(3):257–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langhans T, Strube HW. Speech enhancement by nonlinear multiband envelope filtering. ICASSP, IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process - Proc. 1982;7:156–159.
   Google Scholar
• Narne VK, Vanaja CS. Effect of envelope enhancement on speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Ear Hear. 2008;29(1):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy P, Prasanna SRM. Enhancement of noisy speech by temporal and spectral processing. Speech Commun [Internet]. 2011;53(2):154–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingjing G, Chang L. Speech perception in noise with formant enhancement for older listeners. J Speech, Lang Hear Res. [Internet]. 2019;62(9):3290–3301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John AB, Hall JW, Kreisman BM. Effects of advancing age and hearing loss on gaps-in-Noise test performance. Am J Audiol. 2012;21(2):242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty HN, Mendhakar A. Deep band modulation and noise effects: Perception of phrases in adults. Hear Balanc Commun. 2015;13(3):111–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman AL, Stelmachowicz PG. Hearing loss in children and adults: audiometric configuration, asymmetry, and progression. Ear Hear. 2003;24(3):198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zhang H, Bentler RA, et al. Audiometric records analysis in a clinical population in China. ORL. 2011;73(5):237–245.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Zhang H, Ma H, et al. Hearing threshold levels and hearing loss among people in Zhejiang, China: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e027152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus H. Prediction of verbal communication in noise-A development of generalized SIL curves and the quality of communication (part 2). Appl Acoust. 1987;20(4):245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, et al. The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139(9):1136–1139. Sep
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHA. Tympanometry. 1998. http://www.asha.org/policy/RP1988-00027.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield A, Poon LW, Lombardi L, et al. Speed of processing in normal aging: effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. J Gerontol. 1985;40(5):579–585.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weihing JA, Musiek FE, Shinn JB. The effect of presentation level on the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN©) test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up‐down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971;49(2B):467–477.
   Google Scholar
• Soranzo A, Grassi M. Psychoacoustics: a comprehensive MATLAB toolbox for auditory testing. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty HN, Mendhakar A. Development of phrase recognition test in kannada language. J Indian Speech Language Hearing Assoc. 2015;29(2):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Versfeld NJ, Daalder L, Festen JM, et al. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;107(3):1671–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Veaux RD, Velleman PF, Bock D. Introduction to statistics. 6th ed. New York: Pearson; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI. Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. Am Natl Stand S35–1997. 1997;(Standards Standard Secretariat, Acoustical Society of America).
   Google Scholar
• Narne VK, Prabhu P, Thuvassery P, et al. Frequency importance function for monosyllables in malayalam. Hear Balanc Commun [Internet]. 2016;14(4):201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CW, Souza PE, Forget LN. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995;97(4):2568–2576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A, Phillips DP. Recognition of temporally distorted words by listeners with and without a simulated hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;9(3):199–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider BA, Hamstra SJ. Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;106(1):371–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar