The evaluation of cochlear implant users’ acoustic change detection ability

References

• Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope. Ear Hear. 1999;20(1):33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff JM, Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear. 1998;19(4):290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987;24(4):375–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J, Jerger S. Evoked response to intensity and frequency change. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91(5):433–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yingling CD, Nethercut GE. Evoked responses to frequency shifted tones: tonotopic and contextual determinants. Int J Neurosci. 1983;22(1–2):107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A, Michalewski HJ, Zeng F-G, et al. Frequency changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(9):2111–2124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;107(4):2155–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay KL, Billings CJ, Friesen LM, et al. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds. Ear Hear. 2006;27(2):93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small SA, Werker JF. Does the ACC have potential as an index of early speech discrimination ability? A preliminary study in 4-month-old infants with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2012;33(6):e59–e69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen LM, Tremblay KL. Acoustic change complexes recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 2006;27(6):678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Grose JH, Teagle HF, et al. Gap detection measured with electrically-evoked auditory event-related potentials and speech perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Ear and Hearing. 2013;34(6):733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won JH, Clinard CG, Kwon S, et al. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011;12(3):375–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin BA. Can the acoustic change complex be recorded in an individual with a cochlear implant? Separating neural responses from cochlear implant artifact. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(2):126–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichele T, Nordby H, Rimol LM, et al. Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;24(3):405–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamal N, Tawfik S, Mahrous M. Impact of auditory cortical asymmetry in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International. 2014;15(sup1):S75–S77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharpe RA, Camposeo EL, Muzaffar WK, et al. Effects of age and implanted ear on speech recognition in adults with unilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21(4):223–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire K, Firestone GM, Zhang N, et al. The acoustic change complex in response to frequency changes and its correlation to cochlear implant speech outcomes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:757254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soranzo A, Grassi M. Psychoacoustics: a comprehensive MATLAB toolbox for auditory testing. Front Psychol. 2014;5:712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P, Van Heuven, V. Speak and unSpeak with PRAAT. Glot International. 2001;5(9/10):341–347.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up‐down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971;49(2B):467–477.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol. 1982;11(2):79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Turkyilmaz D, et al. Development and evaluation of the turkish matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(Suppl 2):51–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Calderon J, Luck SJ. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheperle RA, Abbas PJ. Relationships among peripheral and central electrophysiological measures of spatial and spectral selectivity and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2015;36(4):441–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin B, Tremblay K, Stapells D. Principles and applications of cortical auditory evoked potentials. Audit Evok Potent. 2007;23:482–507.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe U, Wohlberedt T, Danilkina G, et al. Acoustic change complex in cochlear implant subjects in comparison with psychoacoustic measures. Coch Impl Int. 2010;11(sup1):426–430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang C, Houston LM, Samy RN, et al. Cortical processing of frequency changes reflected by the acoustic change complex in adult cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(3):152–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon MT, Buss E, Adunka MC, et al. Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(3):279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Iza L, Martinez Z, Ugarte A, et al. Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(4):913–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rak K, Schraven SP, Schendzielorz P, et al. Stable longitudinal performance of adult cochlear implant users for more than 10 years. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(9):e315–e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, et al. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness. Hear Res. 2005;205(1–2):184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar