‘The age of entitlement has ended’: designing a disability insurance scheme in turbulent times

References

• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2016). Commentary on “Reducing the inequality of luck” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 134–139. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2016.1230835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonyhady, B. (2010). Reforming disability policy: From charity and welfare to social insurance and investment. 16th Oswald Barnett Oration, Melbourne, 21 October.
   Google Scholar
• Bonyhady, B. (2013). DisabilityCare: My choice my control (Unpublished conference presentation). My Future Conference, 23 June.
   Google Scholar
• Bonyhady, B. (2014). The NDIS: The legacy social and economic policy reform of our time. Public Lecture at the University of New England, 12 May.
   Google Scholar
• Bonyhady, B. (2016). Reducing the inequality of luck: Keynote address at the 2015 Australasian society for intellectual disability national conference. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 115–123. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2016.1172021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall, K. (2016). Commentary on “Reducing the inequality of luck” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 124–128. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2016.1219233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall, K., Dowson, S., & Beresford, P. (2009). Selling individual budgets, choice and control: Local and global influences on UK social care policy for people with learning difficulties. Policy & Politics, 37(4), 499–515. doi: 10.1332/030557309X445609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 377–91. doi: 10.1177/0958928712449772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2006). Social security law and policy. Sydney: The Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, T., & Buckmaster, L. (2015). Funding the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Budget review 2015–16. Research Paper Series, 2014–15. Canberra: Australian Parliamentary Library.
   Google Scholar
• Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. Milbank Quarterly, 88, 286–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00601.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, B. (2009). For-profit organisations in managed markets for human services. In D. King & G. Meagher (Eds.), Paid care in Australia: Politics, profits, practices (pp. 43–79). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deeming, C. (2013). Social democracy and social policy in neoliberal times. Journal of Sociology, 50, 577–600. doi: 10.1177/1440783313492240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabsch, T. (2005). No fault compensation (Briefing Paper No 6/05). NSW parliamentary library research service.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyffe, C., Pierce, G., Ilsley, B., & Paul, P. (2010). The next steps: Adults with a disability and family carers. Draft for discussion, Carers Victoria. Retrieved from http://www.carersvictoria.org.au/Assets/Files/next-steps-discussion-paper-may-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glucksman, M. (2005). Shifting boundaries and interconnections: Extending the “total social organisation of labour”. The Sociological Review, 53(2), 19–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00570.x
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2015). The quiet paradigm revolution of social investment. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22 (2), 242–256. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxv009
   Google Scholar
• Herscovitch, A., & Stanton, D. (2008). History of social security in Australia. Family Matters, 80, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Recognition struggles and social movements: Cultural claims, contested identities, power and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzmann, R., Sherburne-Benz, L., & Tesliuc, E. (2013). Social risk management: The World Bank’s approach to social protection in a globalizing world. Social Protection Department. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2016). The failure of privatised adult social care in England: What is to be done? London: Centre for Health and the Public Interest.
   Google Scholar
• Ilsley, B. (2013). Unfinished business: Public policy and children in families with a person with a disability or mental illness (Discussion paper). Carers Association Victoria. Retrieved from http://www.carersvictoria.org.au/Assets/Files/unfinished%20business.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ironmonger, D. (1996). Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labor: Estimating gross household product. Feminist Economics, 2 (3), 37–64. doi: 10.1080/13545709610001707756
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, M. (1996). The natural authority of families. Retrieved from http://www.resourcingfamilies.org.au/uploads/70239/ufiles/10753_-_The_Natural_Authority_of_Families.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kingson, E. (2002). Social security, history and operations. In D. J. Ekerdt (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of aging (Vol. 4, pp. 1288–1294). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, F., & Charlesworth, S. (2016). Cash for care under the NDIS: Shaping care workers’ working conditions? Journal of Industrial Relations, 58 (5), 627–646. doi: 10.1177/0022185615623083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintyre, S., & Mitchell, R. (Eds.). (1989). Foundations of arbitration: The origins and effects of state compulsory arbitration, 1890–1914. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, R., & Robinson, F. (Eds.). (2011). Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new global political economy of care. Toronto: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507–548. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, G. (2006). What can we expect from paid carers? Politics & Society, 34 (1), 33–54. doi: 10.1177/0032329205284755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, G., & Goodwin, S. (Eds.). (2015). Sold off: Markets, rights and power in Australian social policy. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2010). Path dependence and the stagnation of Australian social policy between the wars. Journal of Policy History, 22, 450–473. doi: 10.1017/S0898030610000229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2011). A decent provision: Australia welfare policy, 1870 to 1949. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission of Audit. (2014). Towards responsible government: Appendix to the Report of the National Commission of Audit volume 1: 9.2. The National Disability Insurance Scheme. February. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• New Paradigm. (2014). National Disability Insurance Scheme. Melbourne: Psychiatric Disability Services of Victoria (VICSERV): Summer.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, C., Ridley, J., & Hunter, S. (2014). Self-directed support: personalisation, choice and control. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, G., & Ilsley, B. (2011). Ensuring a good life for people with a disability and their families. Response to the Productivity Commission’s draft report on disability care and support. Retrieved from http://carersaustralia.com.au/storage/Submission-to-PC-Disability-Interim-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, C. (2007). Beyond the welfare state? The new political economy of welfare (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitzer, J. (2003). The definition of a social insurance scheme and its classification as defined benefit or defined contribution. 30 June. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/ueps/2003/063003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2011). Disability care and support (Report no. 54, 2 vols.). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• Saraceno, C. (2015). A critical look to the social investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22 (2), 257–269. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxv008
   Google Scholar
• Shut out: The experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia. (2009). National disability strategy consultation report prepared by the National People with Disabilities and Carer Council; FAHCSIA10307.0908.
   Google Scholar
• Soldatic, K., & Pini, B. (2012). Continuity or change? Disability policy and the Rudd government. Social Policy and Society, 11 (2), 183–196. doi: 10.1017/S1474746411000510
   Google Scholar
• Thill, C. (2015). Listening for policy change: How the voices of disabled people shaped Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Disability & Society, 30 (1), 15–28. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2014.987220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerson, C., & Yeandle, S. (Eds.). (2007). Cash for care systems in developed welfare states. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, M. (1998). Counting for nothing: What men value and what women are worth. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. (1987). The foundations of the national welfare state. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493. doi: 10.1177/026101830102100405
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (2009). Claiming and framing in the making of care policies: The recognition and redistribution of care. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Gender and Development Programme Paper Number 13, November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F., & Brennan, D. (2012). Care, markets and migration in a globalising world: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 355–362. doi: 10.1177/0958928712449777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. (1991). Care of disabled people. In G. Dalley (Ed.), Disability and social policy (pp. 199–202). London: Policy Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar