Three good things in nature: noticing nearby nature brings sustained increases in connection with nature / Tres cosas buenas de la naturaleza: prestar atención a la naturaleza cercana produce incrementos prolongados en conexión con la naturaleza

References / Referencias

• Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 17. doi:10.1037/a0016998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., & Ferrer, E. A. (2011). Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature, 471, 51–57. doi:10.1038/nature09678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J., Bragg, R., Pretty, J., Roberts, J., & Wood, C. (2016). The wilderness expedition an effective life course intervention to improve young people’s well-being and connectedness to nature. Journal of Experiential Education, 39, 59–72. doi:10.1177/1053825915626933
   Google Scholar
• Burton, C. M., & King, L. A. (2007). Effects of (very) brief writing on health: The two-minute miracle. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 9–14. doi:10.1348/135910707X250910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervinka, R., Röderer, K., & Hefler, E. (2011). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379–388. doi:10.1177/1359105311416873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19. doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, R., Millman, Z., & Flannigan, J. (2013). Urban landscapes-everyday environmental encounters, their meaning and importance for the individual. Urban Ecosystems, 16, 819–839. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0327-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David Suzuki Foundation. (2016). 30x30 Nature Challenge! Retrieved from http://30x30.davidsuzuki.org
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, R., Van Dorsselaer, S., Ten Have, M., Schoemaker, C., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2005). Seasonal variations in mental disorders in the general population of a country with a maritime climate: Findings from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 654–661. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2011). The natural choice: Securing the value of nature (Vol. 8082). London, UK: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R., Gavin, M., Sanchez, M., & Soloman, J. (2006). The pigeon paradox: Dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conservation Biology, 20, 1814–1816. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00533.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377–389. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic illness. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. P., Gater, R., Sartorius, N., Ustun, T. B., Piccinelli, M., Gureje, O., & Rutter, C. (1997). The validity of the two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27, 191–197. doi:10.1017/S0033291796004242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., van den Berg, A., Hägerhäll, C., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N., Hansmann, R., & Waaseth, G. (2011). Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. In K. Nilsson, M. Sangster, C. Gallis, T. Hartig, S. De Vries, K. Seeland, & J. Schipperijn (Eds.), Forests, trees, and human health (pp. 127–168). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H.-A.H. A, & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, P. (2012). Embodying the mind by extending it. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3, 33–51. doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0087-2
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42–69). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F., & Frantz, C. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643. doi:10.1177/0013916508319745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge, J., De Bruin, M., & Witton, J. (2012). The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: A systematic review. Plos One, 7, e39116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee-Ryan, F. M., Song, Z., Wanberg, C. R., & Kinicki, A. J. (2005). Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 53–76. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menary, R. (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29, 621–632. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M., & Lefort, C. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=aPcET3X2zlEC&pgis=1
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D. (ed.). (1992). Interpersonal difficulties, assessment: A mental health portfolio. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2013). Celebrating the mundane: Nature and the built environment. Environmental Values, 22, 401–413. doi:10.3197/096327113X13648087563827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 813. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303–322. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K. L., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noë, A. (2010). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, J. L., & Benassi, V. A. (2009). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 434–440. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Cormack, A., McRobert, L., & Underhill, R. (2016). 30 days wild: Development and evaluation of a large-scale nature engagement campaign to improve well-being. Plos One, 11, e0149777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., & Hallam, J. (2013). Exploring the psychological rewards of a familiar semi-rural landscape: Connecting to local nature through a mindful approach. The Humanistic Psychologist, 41, 35–53. doi:10.1080/08873267.2012.732156
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Hallam, J., & Lumber, R. (2015). One thousand good things in nature: The aspects of nature that lead to increased nature connectedness. Environmental Values, 24, 603–619. doi:10.3197/096327115X14384223590131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Maspero, M., Golightly, D., Sheffield, D., Staples, V., & Lumber, R. (2016). Nature: A new paradigm for well-being and ergonomics. Ergonomics, 1–14. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1157213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2015). Reflective self-attention: A more stable predictor of connection to nature than mindful attention. Ecopsychology, 7, 166–175. doi:10.1089/eco.2015.0010
   Google Scholar
• Sabloff, A. (2001). Reordering the natural world: Humans and animals in the city. Buffalo, UK: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. (2002). Experiencing nature in special places: Surveys in the north-central region. Journal of Forestry, 100, 8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (1991). Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 231–248. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80185-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (2007). Place experience, gestalt, and the human–nature relationship. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 293–309. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress. Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. L. (2009). The integration of mindfulness and psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 555–560. doi:10.1002/jclp10.1002/jclp.20602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spartz, J. T., & Shaw, B. R. (2011). Place meanings surrounding an urban natural area: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 344–352. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K.-P., Lee, S.-L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 514–521. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The British Psychological Society. (2004). A code of conduct for psychologists. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2010). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wild Network. (2016). The wild network. Retrieved from http://www.thewildnetwork.com
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Iyer, R. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. W., Piff, P. K., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Keltner, D. (2014). An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 61–72. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar