Learning from risk: lessons from L’Aquila and Japan / Aprender del riesgo: lecciones de L’Aquila y Japón

References / Referencias

• Alexander, D. E. (2010). The L’Aquila earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian government policy on disaster response. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 2, 325–342. doi:10.1080/19390459.2010.511450
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, D. E. (2014). Communicating earthquake risk to the public: The trial of the ‘L’Aquila Seven’. Natural Hazards, 72, 1159–1173. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1062-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskar, R., & Baskar, S. (2013). L’Aquila earthquake prediction judgment: An eye-opener. Current Science, 104, 1003. Retrieved from http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/104/08/1003.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, 35, 329–345. doi:10.1080/03085140600844902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, E. S., Landsea, C. W., & Gibney, E. J. (2011). The Deadliest, Costliest, and most Intense United States Tropical Cyclones From 1851 to 2010 (and other frequently requested hurricane facts (NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS NHC-6), Retrieved from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Hurricane Center: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/nws-nhc-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A. (1997). Risk perceptions: ‘Experts’ vs. ‘Lay People’. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, 8, 101–113. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/delpf/vol8/iss1/8/
   Google Scholar
• Cartlidge, E. (2012, October 12). Aftershocks in the courtroom. Science, 338, 184–188. doi:10.1126/science.338.6104.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa, P. M. (2013). Risk communication surrounding the Fukushima nuclear disaster: An anthropological approach. Asia-Europe Journal, 11, 53–64. doi:10.1007/s10308-013-0343-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspar, R., Barnett, J., & Seibt, B. (2015). La crisis vista por el individuo: El Enfoque de la Desviación de la Norma [Crisis as seen by the individual: The Norm Deviation Approach]. Psyecology: Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental /Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 103–135. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2014.1002205
   Google Scholar
• Goodrick, D. (2014). Comparative case studies, Methodological briefs: Impact evaluation 9. Florence: UNICEF, Office of Research. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/brief_9_comparativecasestudies_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Japan. (2011, June). The report of the Japanese government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety: The accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima nuclear power stations. Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters. Retrieved from Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet website: http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/kan/topics/201106/iaea_houkokusho_e.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, R. (2013). Disaster evacuation from Japan’s 2011 Tsunami disaster and the Fukushima nuclear accident (p. 54). Paris: Studies, 05/13, IDDRI.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, M., Campbell, R. J., & Nikitin, M. B. (2012). Fukushima nuclear disaster. USA: CRC, Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from The University of North Texas Digital Library: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87170/m1/1/high_res_d/R41694_2012Jan18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IRGC. (2010). The emergence of risks: Contributing factors. Geneva: International Risk Governance Council. Retrieved from IRGC: http://irgc.org/IMG/pdf/irgc_ER_final_07jan_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B., & Covello, V. T. (Eds.). (1987). The social and cultural construction of risk: Essays on risk selection and perception. Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. H. (2013). Lessons of L’Aquila for operational earthquake forecasting. Seismological Research Letters, 84, 4–7. doi:10.1785/0220120167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazama, M., & Noda, T. (2012). Damage statistics (Summary of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake damage). Soils and Foundations, 52, 780–792. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofstedt, R. (2003). Risk communication: Pitfalls and promises. European Review, 11, 417–435. doi:10.1017/S106279870300036X
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, R. E., & McMakin, A. H. (2013). This is a book Risk Communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety and health risks. (5th ed.). Piscataway, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Matanle, P. (2011). The Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear meltdown: Towards the (re)construction of a safe, sustainable, and compassionate society in Japan’s shrinking regions. Local Environment: the International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 16, 823–847. doi:10.1080/13549839.2011.607160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Police Agency (NPAJ). (2015). Damage Situation and Police Countermeasures associated with 2011Tohoku district - off the Pacific Ocean Earthquake [table]. Retrieved from https://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palenchar, M. J., & Heath, R. L. (2007). Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society. Public Relations Review, 33, 120–129. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C. B. (2014, June 25). Japan’s political leadership helped save country from worst-case Fukushima disaster. Stanford News. Retrieved from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/june/fukushima-crisis-kan-062514.html
   Google Scholar
• Perko, T. (2011). Importance of risk communication during and after a nuclear accident. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7, 388–392. doi:10.1002/ieam.230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pidgeon, N. (1998). Risk assessment, risk values and the social science Programme: Why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59, 5–15. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, A., Draquila: the film Berlusconi doesn't want you to see. Retrieved from The Guardian, 19 May, 2010, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2010/may/19/draquila-silvio-berlusconi-film-cannes, 11 Aug 2015
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2005). Risk governance – towards an integrative approach (White Paper No1). Retrieved from International Risk Governance Council (IRGC): http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_WP_No_1_Risk_Governance__reprinted_version_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ropeik, D. (2011, September 26). Do bad earthquake predictions kill people? No. But bad risk communication might. Big Think. Retrieved from http://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/do-bad-earthquake-predictions-kill-people
   Google Scholar
• Sandman, P. M. (1987, November). Risk communication: Facing public outrage. EPA Journal, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 13(9), 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L., Moen, B., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research (Rotunde no. 84). Retrieved from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Psychology: http://www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/torbjorn.rundmo/psychometric_paradigm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (2012). The perception gap: Radiation and risk. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(3), 67–75. doi:10.1177/0096340212444870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville, P., & Haynes, K. (2011, 23 September). Manslaughter trial of L’Aquila earthquake scientists will cause serious aftershocks. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/manslaughter-trial-of-laquila-earthquake-scientists-will-cause-serious-aftershocks-3477
   Google Scholar
• Strydom, P. (2008). Risk communication: World creation through collective learning under complex contingent conditions. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 5–22. doi:10.1080/13669870701521248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, T. (2011). Deconstructing the zero-risk mindset: The lessons and future responsibilities for a post-Fukushima nuclear Japan. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(5), 9–18. doi:10.1177/0096340211421477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svendsen, E. R. (2013). A new perspective on radiation risk communication in Fukushima, Japan. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 62,196–203
   Google Scholar
• van Asselt, M. B. A., & Renn, O. (2011). Risk governance. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 431–449. doi:10.1080/13669877.2011.553730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L., Oliveira, R., & Caser, Ú. (2009). Governância e Participação na Gestão Territorial (Série Política e Sociedade Nº5). Retrieved from Direção-Geral do Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento: http://www.dgterritorio.pt/produtos_e_servicos/publicacoes/serie_politica_de_cidades/5__governancia_e_participacao_na_gestao_territorial/.
   Google Scholar
• Veland, H., & Aven, T. (2013). Risk communication in the light of different risk perspectives. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 110, 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar