Structural confirmation of the 24-item Environmental Attitude Inventory / Confirmación estructural del Inventario de Actitudes Ambientales de 24 ítems

References / Referencias

• Ajdukovic. (2015). Appropriation et valorisation sociale de l’orientation pro-environnementale (Appropriation and social valorization of eco-friendly orientation), doctoral thesis. University of Burgundy.
   Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amerigo, M., Aragonés, J. I., & García, J. A. (2012). Exploring the dimensions of environmental concern. An integrative proposal. Psyecology, 3, 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Apostolidis, T., & Fieulaine, N. (2004). Validation française de l’échelle de temporalité. [French validation of the time-scale]. Revue Europeene de Psychologie Appliquee, 54, 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Shah Alam: Universiti Teknologi MARA Publication Centre
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, F. X., Brengelmann, J. C., & Wiseman, M. (2000). Risk-taking and environmental perception. The Environmentalist, 20, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (2006). Adolescents’ attitudes towards nature and environment: Quantifying the 2-MEV model. The Environmentalist, 26, 247–254.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. (2017). Climate scientists flock to France’s call. Nature News, 547, 269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482–524). London: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm.”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janigo, K. A., & Wu, J. (2015). Collaborative redesign of used clothes as a sustainable fashion solution and potential business opportunity. Fashion Practice, 7, 75–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1033–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Hebel, F., Montpied, P., & Fontanieu, V. (2014). What can influence students’ environmental attitudes? Results from a study of 15-year-old students in France. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 329–345.
   Google Scholar
• Martín, A. M., Hernández, B., & Alonso, I. (2017). Pro-environmental motivation and regulation to respect environmental laws as predictors of illegal anti-environmental behaviour/La motivación pro-ambiental y la motivación para respetar las leyes medioambientales como predictoras de la conducta anti-ecológica ilegal. Psyecology, 8, 33–74.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., Richter, I., Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Fischer, R. (2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1127–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2011). Exploring the concept of environmental generativity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). The hierarchy enforcement hypothesis of environmental exploitation: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 188–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, I., Amérigo, M., & García, J. A. (2016). Design and application of an environmental attitudes scale in primary education/Diseño y aplicación de una escala de actitudes hacia el medio ambiente en educación primaria. Psyecology, 7, 64–88.
   Google Scholar
• Munoz, F., Bogner, F., Clement, P., & Carvalho, G. S. (2009). Teachers’ conceptions of nature and environment in 16 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 407–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansu, P., Tarquinio, C., & Gilibert, D. (2005). Internal attributions in an intergroup business setting. Le Travail humain, 68, 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirages, D. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Ark II: Social response to environmental imperatives. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleyer-Lindenmann, A., Dauvier, B., Ittner, H., & Piolat, M. (2014). Mesure des attitudes environnementales: Analyse structurale d’une version française de la NEPS [Measuring environmental attitudes: A structural analysis of a French version of the NEP Scale] (Dunlap et al., 2000). Psychologie Française, 61, 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suk, H. J., Jung, H., & Sato, T. (2009, October). How environmental attitude affects the consumers’ tolerance of paper colors. In The 3rd IASDR Conference, Seoul Korea, CD-ROM, not paged.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, K., Stewart, A. J., & Daly, M. (2014). Influencing green behavior through environmental goal priming: The mediating role of automatic evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653–771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2003). A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, M., Wilson, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). Environmental values and authoritarianism. Psychology Research, 2, 25–31.
   Google Scholar