Effects of contact with nature on connectedness, environmental identity and evoked contents (Efectos del contacto con la naturaleza en conectividad, identidad ambiental y contenidos evocados)

References

• Arnocky, S., Stroink, M., & DeCicco, T. (2007). Self-construal predicts environmental concern, cooperation, and conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brügger, A., Kaiser, F. G., & Roczen, N. (2011). One for all? Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with Nature. European Psychologist, 16, 324–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelensk, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Lafortezza, R., Colangelo, G., Ferrini, F., Salbitano, F., … Sanesi, G. (2015). Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, J. M. C., & Martini, H. A. (2014). Potencia estadística y cálculo del tamaño del efecto en G* Power: Complementos a las pruebas de significación estadística y su aplicación en psicología. Salud & Sociedad, 5, 210–222.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. F. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 13, 437–452.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. C., Li, D., & Jane, H. A. (2017). Wild or tended nature? The effects of landscape location and vegetation density on physiological and psychological responses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment. The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., Rea, T., & Waite, S. (2006). The special nature of the outdoors: Its contribution to the education of children aged 3-11. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 10(2), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N., & Gatersleben, B. (2013). Transcendent experiences in wild and manicured settings: The influence of the trait “connectedness to nature”. Ecopsychology, 5, 92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, L. S., Shanahan, D. F., & Fuller, R. A. (2017). A review of the benefits of nature experiences: More than meets the eye. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo, M. P., & Corraliza, J. A. (2000). Environmental aesthetics and psychological well-being. Psychology in Spain, 4, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2011). The affective quality of human-natural environment relationships. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 451–469. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoot, R. E., & Friedman, H. (2011). Connectedness and environmental behavior: Sense of interconnectedness and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 30, 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, H., Hitchmough, J., & Jorgensen, A. (2017). All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, C. D., Giusti, M., Fischer, J., Abson, D. J., Klaniecki, K., Dorninger, C., … von Wehrden, H. (2017). Human–Nature connection: A multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 106–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33, 507–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashima, Y., Kashima, E., Farsides, T., Kim, U., Strack, F., Werth, L., & Yuki, M. (2004). Culture and context-sensitive self: The amount and meaning of context-sensitivity of phenomenal self differ across cultures. Self and Identity, 3, 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefländer, A. K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19, 370–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, A., & Olivos, P. (2017, September). The role of environmental values, environmental identity, and contact with nature, in predicting support for pro-environmental behaviours. Paper presented at International Conference on Environmental Psychology, A Coruña, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, A., Olivos, P., & Navarro, O. (2014, September). Contacto com ambiente natural, ligação à natureza e bem-estar. Paper presented at IX Congresso Iberoamericano de Psicologia/II Congresso Ordem dos Psicólogos Portugueses, Lisboa, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, O., Olivos, P., & Fleury-Bahi, G. (2017). Connectedness to nature scale: Validity and reliability in the French context. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivos, P., & Aragonés, J. I. (2011). Psychometric properties of the environmental identity scale (EID). Psyecology, 2, 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Olivos, P., & Aragonés, J. I. (2014). Medio ambiente, self y conectividad con la naturaleza. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 31, 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Olivos, P., Aragonés, J. I., & Amérigo, M. (2011). The connectedness with nature scale and its relationship with environmental beliefs and identity. Internacional Journal of Hispanic Psychology, 4, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Olivos, P., Aragonés, J. I., & Navarro, O. (2013). Educación ambiental: Itinerario en la naturaleza y su relación con conectividad, preocupaciones ambientales y conducta. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45, 501–511.
   Google Scholar
• Pasca, L., Aragonés, J. I., & Coello, M. T. (2017). An analysis of the connectedness to nature scale based on item response theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, J. L., & Benassi, V. A. (2009). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 434–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, M., de la Garza, A., & López, E. (2010, Abril). Un estudio de mediciones de actitudes implícitas hacia al medio ambiente en estudiantes de biología y psicología: ¿biofilia? Revista Electrónica Psicología Científica.com, 12(21). Retrieved from http://www.psicologiacientifica.com/mediciones-actitudes-hacia-medio-ambiente-biofilia/
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (1991). Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (2002). Experiencing nature in special places. Journal of Forestry, 100, 8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, H. W. (2007). Place experience, gestalt, and the human-nature relationship. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1219–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southon, G. E., Jorgensen, A., Dunnett, N., Hoyle, H., & Evans, K. L. (2017). Biodiverse perennial meadows have aesthetic value and increase residents’ perceptions of site quality in urban green-space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staats, H., Gatersleben, B., & Hartig, T. (1997). Change in mood as a function of environmental design: Arousal and pleasure on a simulated forest hike. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 283–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 217–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomashow, M. (1995). Ecological identity, becoming a reflective environmentalist. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Increasing children’s freedom of movement, and other papers. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyles, K. J., White, M. P., Hattam, C., Pahl, S., King, H., & Austen, M. (2017). Are some natural environments more psychologically beneficial than others? The importance of type and quality on connectedness to nature and psychological restoration. Environment and Behavior. doi:10.1177/0013916517738312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar