Bayesian joint inversion of controlled source electromagnetic and magnetotelluric data to infer presence of a freshwater aquifer offshore New Jersey

References

• Agostinetti, N. P. and Bodin, T., 2018. Flexible Coupling in Joint Inversions: A Bayesian Structure Decoupling Algorithm, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(10), 8798–8826.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Tkalcic, H., Arroucau, P., Gallagher, K., and Rawlinson, N., 2012. Transdimensional inversion of receiver functions and surface wave dispersion, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B2).
   Google Scholar
• Bouchedda, A., Chouteau, M., Binley, A., and Giroux, B., 2012. 2-D joint structural inversion of cross-hole electrical resistance and ground penetrating radar data, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78, 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Calvetti, D. and Somersalo, E., 2018. Inverse problems: From regularization to Bayesian inference, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 10(3), e1427.
   Google Scholar
• Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., and Constable, C. G., 1987. Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52(3), 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Gallardo, L. A. and Meju, M. A., 2004. Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B3), 106–11.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, C. J. and Moller, J., 1994. Simulation Procudures and Likelihood Inference for Spatial Point Processes, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 21(4), 359–373.
   Google Scholar
• eds Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., and Spiegelhalter, D., 1995. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice, CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez Trevino, E. and Edwards, R. N., 1983. Electromagnetic soundings in the sedimentary basin of southern Ontario – A case history, Geophysics, 48(3), 311–330.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. J., 1995. Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Computation and Bayesian Model Determination, Biometrika, 82(4), 711.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, W. K., 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57(1), 97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hoversten, G. M., Cassassuce, F., Gasperikova, E., Newman, G. A., Chen, J., Rubin, Y., Hou, Z., and Vasco, D., 2006. Direct reservoir parameter estimation using joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data, Geophysics, 71(3), C1–C13.
   Google Scholar
• Jardani, A., Revil, A., Slob, E., and Sollner, W., 2010. Stochastic joint inversion of 2D seismic and seismoelectric signals in linear poroelastic materials: A numerical investigation, Geophysics, 75(1), N19–N31.
   Google Scholar
• Key, K., 2009. 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers, Geophysics, 74(2), F9–F20.
   Google Scholar
• Lelievre, P. G., Farquharson, C. G., and Hurich, C. A., 2012. Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration, Geophysics, 77(1), K1–K15.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, E., 1980. The practical salinity scale 1978 and its antecedents, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 5(1), 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, L. and Sinha, M., 2000. Use of marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding for sub-basalt exploration, Geophysical Prospecting, 48(6), 1091–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E., 1953. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6), 1087–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrovica, J. X. and Forte, A. M., 2004. A new inference of mantle viscosity based upon joint inversion of convection and glacial isostatic adjustment data, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 225(1-2), 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Mosegaard, K. and Tarantola, A., 1995. Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B7), 12431–12447.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G. A. and Alumbaugh, D. L., 2000. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients, Geophysical Journal International, 140(2), 410–424.
   Google Scholar
• Rabben, T. E., Tjelmeland, H., and Ursin, B., 2008. Non-linear Bayesian joint inversion of seismic reflection coefficients, Geophysical Journal International, 173(1), 265–280.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki, Y., 1989. Two-dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole-dipole resistivity data, Geophysics, 54(2), 254–262.
   Google Scholar
• Vozoff, K. and Jupp, D. L. B., 1975. Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data, Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 42(3), 977–991.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. H. and Hohmann, G. W., 1987. 4. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications, in Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, pp. 130–311, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
   Google Scholar
• Yokota, Y., Koketsu, K., Fujii, Y., Satake, K., Sakai, S., Shinohara, M., and Kanazawa, T., 2011. Joint inversion of strong motion, teleseismic, geodetic, and tsunami datasets for the rupture process of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake, Geophysical Research Letters, 38(7)
   Google Scholar