Bayesian geophysical inversion with Gaussian process machine learning and trans-D Markov chain Monte Carlo

References

• Abubakar, A., Habashy, T. M., Druskin, V. L., Knizhnerman, L., and Alumbaugh, D., 2008. 2.5D forward and inverse modeling for interpreting low-frequency electromagnetic measurements, Geophysics, 73(4), F165– F177.
   Google Scholar
• Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., and Shah, V. B., 2017. Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing, SIAM Review, 59(1), 65–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, T. and Sambridge, M., 2009. Seismic tomography with the reversible jump algorithm, Geophysical Journal International, 178(3), 1411–1436.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, T., Salmon, M., Kennett, B. L. N., and Sambridge, M., 2012a. Probabilistic surface reconstruction from multiple data sets: An example for the Australian Moho, Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(B10), B10307.
   Google Scholar
• Buland, A. and Kolbjornsen, O., 2012. Bayesian inversion of CSEM and magnetotelluric data, Geophysics, 77(1), E33–E42.
   Google Scholar
• Calvetti, D. and Somersalo, E., 2018. Inverse problems: From regularization to Bayesian inference, Wiley Inter- disciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 10(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chave, A. D. and Cox, C. S., 1982. Controlled electromagnetic sources for measuring electrical conductivity beneath the oceans, 1. Forward problem and model study, Journal of Geophysical Research, 87(B7), 5327– 5338.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Hoversten, G. M., Vasco, D., Rubin, Y., and Hou, Z., 2007. A Bayesian model for gas saturation estimation using marine seismic AVA and CSEM data, Geophysics, 72(2), WA85.
   Google Scholar
• Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., and Constable, C. G., 1987. Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data, Geophysics, 52(3), 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Cordua, K. S., Hansen, T. M., and Mosegaard, K., 2012. Monte Carlo full-waveform inversion of crosshole GPR data using multiple-point geostatistical a priori information, Geophysics, 77(2), H19–H31.
   Google Scholar
• Criminisi, A., Shotton, J., and Konukoglu, E., 2011. Decision Forests for Classification, Regression, Density Estimation, Manifold Learning and Semi-Supervised Learning, Tech. rep., Microsoft Research.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot-Hedlin, C. and Constable, S., 2004. Inversion of magnetotelluric data for 2D structure with sharp resistivity contrasts, Geophysics, 69(1), 78.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K., Bodin, T., Sambridge, M., Weiss, D., Kylander, M., and Large, D., 2011. Inference of abrupt changes in noisy geochemical records using transdimensional changepoint models, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 311(1-2), 182–194.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, C. J. and Moller, J., 1994. Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scandinavian journal of statistics, pp. 359–373.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. J., 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination, Biometrika, 82(4), 711–732.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, J., Glinsky, M. E., and Hedditch, J., 2010. Resolution and uncertainty in 1D CSEM inversion: A Bayesian approach and open-source implementation, Geophysics, 75(6), F151–F171.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. and Minsley, B., 2017. Probabilistic inversion of AEM data with an explicit choice of prior information, 2nd European Airborne Electromagnetics Conference 2017, Held at Near Surface Geoscience Conference and Exhibition 2017, (September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. and Sambridge, M., 2015. Geophysical imaging using trans-dimensional trees, Geophysical Journal International Geophys. J. Int, 203, 972–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Z., Rubin, Y., Hoversten, G. M., Vasco, D., and Chen, J., 2006. Reservoir-parameter identification using minimum relative entropy-based Bayesian inversion of seismic AVA and marine CSEM data, Geophysics, 71(6), O77 – O88.
   Google Scholar
• Key, K., 2009. 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers, Geophysics, 74(2), F9.
   Google Scholar
• Krige, D. G., 1952. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, Journal of the Chemical, Metallurgical and Mining Society of South Africa, pp. 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Laloy, E., Herault, R., Jacques, D., and Linde, N., 2017. Efficient training-image based geostatistical simulation and inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural network, ArXiv, 1708.04597.
   Google Scholar
• Lochbuhler, T., Vrugt, J. A., Sadegh, M., and Linde, N., 2015. Summary statistics from training images as prior information in probabilistic inversion, Geophysical Journal International, 201(1), 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Loseth, L. O., Pedersen, H. M., Ursin, B., Amundsen, L., and Ellingsrud, S., 2006. Low-frequency electromagnetic fields in applied geophysics: Waves or diffusion?, Geophysics, 71(4), W29–W40.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, L. and Sinha, M., 2000. Use of marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding for sub-basalt exploration, Geophysical Prospecting, 48(6), 1091–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Malinverno, A., 2002. Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem, Geophysical Journal International, 151(3), 675–688.
   Google Scholar
• Mittet, R. and Gabrielsen, P. T., 2013. Decomposition in upgoing and downgoing fields and inversion of marine CSEM data, Geophysics, 78(1), E1–E17.
   Google Scholar
• Myer, D., Key, K., and Constable, S., 2015. Marine CSEM of the Scarborough gas field, Part 2: 2D inversion, Geophysics, 80(3), E187–E196.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G. A. and Alumbaugh, D. L., 2000. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients, Geophysical Journal International, 140(2), 410–424.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, G. D. and Linde, N., 2016. On structure-based priors in Bayesian geophysical inversion, Geophysical Journal International, pp. 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, A., Key, K., Bodin, T., Myer, D., and Constable, S., 2014. Bayesian inversion of marine CSEM data from the Scarborough gas field using a transdimensional 2-D parametrization, Geophysical Journal International, 199, 1847–1860.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, A., Kaplan, S., Washbourne, J., and Albertin, U., 2017. Low frequency full waveform seismic inversion within a tree based Bayesian framework, Geophysical Journal International, 212, 522–542.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, A. and Myer, D., 2019, Bayesian geophysical inversion with trans-dimensional Gaussian Process machine learning, Geophysical Journal International.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I., 2006. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sambridge, M., Gallagher, K., Jackson, A., and Rickwood, P., 2006. Trans-dimensional inverse problems, model comparison and the evidence, Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 528–542.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. K. I. and Rasmussen, C. E., 1996. Gaussian processes for regression, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. D. and Cox, C. S., 1981. Electromagnetic active source sounding near the East Pacific Rise, Geophysical Research Letters, 8, 1043–1046.
   Google Scholar