The disclosure dilemma: Returning to journalism after political media advising

References

• Allen, D. (2008). The trouble with transparency. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 323–340. doi:10.1080/14616700801997224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baume, S., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2013). Transparency as a requirement of good governance: A historical perspective. Paper presented at the CAST Workshop ‘National Security, Risk Management, and the Transformation of Bureaucratic Ethics’, Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://cast.ku.dk/national-security-risk-management-and-the-transformation-of-bureaucratic-ethics/download/Baume___Papadopoulos_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969/1998). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Burgess, B. (1994). Developments in qualitative data analysis: an introduction. In A. Bryman & B. Burgess (Eds.) Analyzing Qualitative Data (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (1998). Conflict of Interest. In R. Chadwick, (Ed.) Encyclopedia of applied ethics (2nd ed., Vols 1 A-D, pp. 589–595). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Davis and A. Starck (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (2013). Conflict of interest. In The international encyclopedia of ethics, Wiley online library: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. (2014). From ‘watchdog’ to ‘spin-doctor’: An examination of the transition from journalist to parliamentary media adviser and back again. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences. Oxford: Pergamom Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillmor, D. (2010). mediactive. Retrieved from http://www.mediactive.com
   Google Scholar
• Gladstone, B. (2011). The influencing machine: Brooke Galdstone on the media. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73. doi:10.1177/0020852311429667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A., Singer, J. B., & Ceppos, J. (2007). Shifting roles, enduring values: The credible journalist in a digital age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 22(4), 262–279. doi:10.1080/08900520701583545
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1927/2008). Being and time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (2002). Pure phenomenology, its method and its field of investigation. In D. Moran & T. Mooney (Eds.) The phenomenology reader (pp. 124–133). London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, J. (2005). About Me & Disclosures. Retrieved from http://buzzmachine.com/about/
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, J. (2011). jeff-jarvis-on-transparency-in-journalism. Retrieved from http://videos.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-jarvis-on-transparency-in-journalism-517158953
   Google Scholar
• Jurgenson, N., & Rey, P. J. (2013). The fan dance: How privacy thrives in an age of hyper-publicity. In G. Lovink & M. Rasch (Eds.), Unlike us reader: Social media monopolies and their altneratives (pp. 61–75). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2014, February 25). You ain’t seen nothing yet. Journalism Studies, 1–11. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.886837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, D. (1996). Speaking of sadness: Depression, disconnection and the meanings of illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2007). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2010). Blur: How to know what’s true in the age of information overload. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. (2012). Transparency and other journalistic norms on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(3), 402–417. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.657909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in journalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, K., & Rosenstiel, T. (2014). The new ethics of journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQPress.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, B. (2006). Cultural chaos: Journalism, news and power in a globalised world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, O. (2006). Transparency and the ethics of communication. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to good governance? (pp. 75–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Revers, M. (2014). The twitterization of news making: Transparency and journalistic professionalism. Journal of Communication, 64, 806–826. doi:doi:10.1111/jcom.12111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170. doi:10.1177/146488490100200201
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S. (2015). The magical concept of transparency. In L. Zion & D. Craig (Eds.), Ethics for digital journalists: Emerging best practices (pp. 45–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, D. (2009). Transparency is the new objectivity. Retrieved from http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2009/07/19/transparency-is-the-new-objectivity/
   Google Scholar