References
- Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity.
- Beck, U. (2007). Power in the global age. A new global political economy. Cambridge: Polity.
- Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity.
- Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2010). Varieties of second modernity: The cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 409–443. doi:10.1111/bjos.2010.61.issue-3
- Benhabib, S. (2006). Another cosmopolitanism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across borders. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Brassett, J., & Smith, W. (2010). Deliberation and global civil society: Agency, arena, affect. Review of International Studies, 36, 413–430. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000082
- Calhoun, C. (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 1–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Democracy and liberty. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cox, R. (2006). Environment communication and the public sphere. London: Sage.
- Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice matters: Culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.
- Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ferguson, Y. H., & Mansbach, R. W. (2004). Remapping global politics. History’s revenge and future shock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fishkin, J. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Goldstein, J., & Rotich, J. (2008). Digitally networked technology in Kenya’s 2007–2008 post election crisis. Internet & Democracy Case Study Series, 2008–09, 2–10 ( Berkman Center Research Publication).
- Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society: An answer to war. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Mill, J. S. (1865). Considerations on representative government. London: Longman.
- Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
- Rantanen, T. (2010). Methodological inter-nationalism in comparative media research. Flow studies in international communication. In A. Rooscall & I. Salovaara-Moring (Eds.), Communicating the Nation (pp. 25–40). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
- Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Siedschlag, A. (2007). Digital democracy and its application to the international Arena – From ‘Deliberation’ to ‘decision. In M. Dunn, et al. (Eds.), The resurgence of the state (pp. 35–58). Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Spichal, S. (2012). Transnationalizaton of the public sphere and the fate of the public. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
- Stichweh, R. (2007). Dimensionen des Weltstaats im system der Weltpolitik. In M. Albert & R. Stichweh (Eds.), Weltstaat und Weltstaatlichkeit (pp. 25–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
- Wright, S. (2012). Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society, 14, 244–261. doi:10.1177/1461444811410679