Rethinking learning spaces: networks, structures, and possibilities for learning in the twenty-first century

References

• Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces. E-Learning and Digital Media, 1(2), 302–316.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, B. C. (2010). ‘Building an airplane in the air’: The life of the inquiry group. In B. Drayton & J. Falk (Eds.), Creating and facilitating effective on-line professional development for educators (pp. 47–67). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham Shum, S., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhathoki, N., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 548–575. doi:10.1177/0002764212469364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G. C., Pepler, G., Bacsich, P., Padilla, B., & Bird, T. (in press). Promoting policy uptake for open educational resources and open practices. In C. Haythornthwaite, R. Andrews, J. Fransman, & E. Meyers (Eds.), Handbook of e-learning research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2011). Week 1: What is connectivism? Connectivism and connective knowledge MOOC. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://cck11.mooc.ca/week1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Learning by expanding: Ten years after. ( F. Seege, Trans. Lernen durch Expansion). Marburg: BdWi-Verlag. Retrieved September 26, 2015, from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/intro.htm
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S., & Paulin, D. (2015, January). Tweet to learn: Expertise and centrality in conference Twitter networks. In T. X. Bui and R. H. Sprague Jr. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 48th Hawaiian international conference on systems sciences (pp. 1920–1929). New York, NY: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (Eds.). (2013). Literacy in the digital university. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Absar, R., Haythornthwaite, C., & Paulin, D. (2015). Media multiplexity in connectivist MOOCs. In P. Blikstein, A. Merceron, and G. Siemens, (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth learning analytics and knowledge conference. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Enabling community through social media. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(10), e248. doi:10.2196/jmir.2796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked influence in social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), whole issue.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Retrieved September 25, 2015, from http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/pr/Heutagogy.html
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2002a). Strong, weak and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385–401. doi:10.1080/01972240290108195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2002b). Building social networks via computer networks: Creating and sustaining distributed learning communities. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities: Learning and change in cyberspace (pp. 159–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. doi:10.1080/13691180500146185
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2009). Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2011a). Learning networks, crowds and communities. In G. Conole and D. Gašević (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2011b). Online knowledge crowds and communities. In J. Echeverria, A. Alonso, & P. J. Oiarzabal (Eds.), Knowledge communities (pp. 193–209)). Reno, NV: Center for Basque Studies. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14198
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Emergent practices for literacy, e-learners, and the digital university. In R. Goodfellow & M. Lea (Eds.), Literacy in the digital university (pp. 56–66)). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2014). Learning networks. In R. Alhajj & J. Rokne (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining (pp. 785–793). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., Andrews, R., Fransman, J., & Meyers, E. (Eds.) (in press). Handbook of E-Learning Research (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., & De Laat, M. (2011). Social network informed design for learning with educational technology. In A. D. Olofsson & J. O. Lindberg (Eds.), Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 352–374). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., De Laat, M., & Schreurs, B. (in press). A social network analytic perspective on e-learning. In C. Haythornthwaite, R. Andrews, J. Fransman, & E. Meyers (Eds.), Handbook of e-learning research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., & Meyers, E. (2014). New media, new literacies and new forms of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(3–4), whole issue.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1101–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robinson, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. (2015). Networked learning: An educational paradigm for the age of digital networks. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., & Kennedy, R. (2015, January 10). What we can learn from the epic failure of Google flu trends. Wired. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://www.wired.com/2015/10/can-learn-epic-failure-google-flu-trends/
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nahon, K., & Hemsley, J. (2013). Going viral. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, G., & Stark, D. (2004). Permanently beta: Responsive organization in the internet era. In P. E. N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The Internet in context (pp. 173–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulin, D., & Haythornthwaite, C. (in press). Crowdsourcing the curriculum: Redefining e-learning practices through peer-generated approaches. The Information Society.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social network operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senges, M., Brown, J. S., & Rheingold, H. (2008). Entrepreneurial learning in the networked age. How New Learning Environments Foster Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Paradigms, 1(1), 125–140.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2005a). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2005b). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. Retrieved August 14, 2015, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. doi:10.1177/0002764213498851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended, and online learning. Retrieved August 17, 2015, from linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. doi:10.1177/0002764213479366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twidale, M. B., & Nichols, D. M. (2013). Agile methods for agile universities. In T. A. C. Besley & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Re-imagining the creative university for the 21st century (pp. pp. 27-48). Dordrecht: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar