In medias res: communication, existence, and materiality

References

• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axley, S. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy Management Reviews, 9, 428–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2000). The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation, and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20. doi:10.1111/jcom.2012.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2014). Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication. Language Under Discussion, 2(1), Retrieved from http://www.ludjournal.org/index.php?journal=LUD&page=article⊕view&path%5B%5D=16&path%5B%5D=5
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2015a). In the name of the law: Ventriloquism and juridical matters. In K. McGee (Ed.), Latour and the passage of law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2015b). Organizational discourse: Communication and constitution. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Fairhurst, G. T., & Huët, R. (2012). Why matter always matters in (organizational) communication. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 296–314)). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2000). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A. (1993). La passion musicale [The musical passion]. Paris: Métailié.
   Google Scholar
• Horace. (c. 19/1975). The poetic art. A translation of Horace’s Ars Poetica. (C. H. Sisson, Trans.). Cheshire: Carcanet Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, Activity, 3(4), 228–245. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2008). What is the style of matters of concern? Two lectures in empirical philosophy. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martine, T., Cooren, F., Bénel, A., & Zacklad, M. (in press). What does really matter in technology adoption and use? A CCO approach. Management Communication Quarterly.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning. Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1989). How performatives work. Linguistics Philosophy, 12, 535–558. doi:10.1007/BF00627773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656. doi:10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Souriau, É. (1956). Du mode d’existence de l’oeuvre à faire. In Bulletin de la société française de philosophie(25) (pp. 4–44).
   Google Scholar
• Souriau, É. (2009). Les différents modes d’existence, suivi de Du mode d’existence de l’oeuvre à faire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I., & Latour, B. (2009). Le sphinx de l’œuvre. In Les différents modes d’existence (pp. 1–75). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization. Communication as site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2011). The situated organization. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2014). When organization fails: Why authority matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Sage: London.
   Google Scholar
• Vatz, R. E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy Rhetoric, 6, 154–161.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1920). The concept of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar